Welps, us guys are screwd. Boys will be girls - eventually Extinction threat rises as creatures ingest 'gender-bending' chemicals from plastics and pesticides Mark Townsend Sunday July 18, 2004 The Observer Mother narure is taking over. An extraordinary feminisation process has begun to affect Britain's wildlife - and scientists warn it could ultimately dismantle the evolutionary process that has existed for 3.5 billion years. A trend first noted in whelks is starting to spread rapidly among other wildlife species in the food chain. The first national survey of 42 rivers by the Environment Agency has just been completed and it found that a third of male fish are growing female reproductive tissues and organs. Effects were most pronounced in younger fish, raising grave implications for future stocks. Scientists now fear that seals, dolphins, otters, birds such as peregrine falcons and even honey bees are heading towards a uni-sex existence that would lead to extinction. Blame has fallen on the increasing prevalence of a group of chemicals known as endocrine disruptors. These are found in in plastics, food packaging, shampoos and pesticides and accumulate in the environment. They can mimic the female hormone oestrogen when ingested. A reduction in the size of male genitals, a lower sex drive and parts of the testes turning into ovary tissue are among the symptoms. As the effect of the chemicals starts to creep up the food chain, concern will mount over the potential effect on human health amid increasing evidence of falling sperm counts and infertility among men. Charles Tyler, professor of environmental and molecular fish biology at the University of Exeter, who is leading an international team studying the impact of so-called 'gender-bending' chemicals warns that a point where a species can no longer reproduce is a very real concern. 'We have reached a crucial point. Now we are starting to see the effects while only just starting to understand what is happening. This poses a serious threat to species in some areas,' said Tyler. Others studying the phenomena say the feminisation process is a warning from nature that a nightmare is about to unfold. Pressure will again resume this week on ministers to curb the use of 'gender-bending' chemicals. Environmentalists will point to research revealing that honey bees, so vital for the pollination of plants, were found to display a lower sex drive with fewer eggs laid by the queen after exposure to endocrine disruptors. They also point to recent studies involving bottle-nosed dolphins in the North Sea. Again, the presence of chemicals has been linked to an increase in birth defects, most notable among male specimens, along with more infant deaths which has resulted in an ageing of the population. So far the government has agreed to fund studies into suspicions that the otter's comeback after decades of decline will be hampered by the feminising effects of the chemicals. A separate study has just been funded into the dipper which feeds on fish taken from the rivers. Tyler is among those who have complained that the huge gap in scientific knowledge over gender bending pollutants has so far prevented any action in the outlawing of chemicals. Toxicology expert Andreas Kortenkamp of the University of London's school of pharmacy, believes the government has 'grossly underestimated' the chemicals' effects. He believes that current safeguards to protect wildlife are grossly inadequate. In particular, he warns that nothing is being done to calculate how cocktails of chemicals react in the environment. More than 100,000 synthetic chemicals remain authorised for use, with the European Union holding a list of 550 potential endocrine disruptors. It is not yet known precisely which ones have altered the male reproductive organs of bream, carp, roach and gudgeon or caused hormone disruption among grey seal pups in the North Sea. Bees were found to be affected by chemicals used commonly on crops in the UK countryside. The findings coincide with renewed concern over fertility levels among men. Sperm counts have fallen by a third between 1989 and 2002, according to some studies, while one in six British couples now experiences difficulty in conceiving. Contaminated drinking water caused by the by-products of the contraceptive pill flowing back into the system is one of the the explanations put forward. Justin Woolford, a spokesman for the World Wildlife Fund, said: 'What we do to wildlife we ultimately do to ourselves.' Yet almost two years have passed since the World Health Organisation urged governments to investigate the effects of gender-bending chemicals.
You exclaim "fuck!" I say, no, not for much longer, by the looks of it. GET IT WHILE THE GETTIN'S GOOD! It is a freaky thing (I heard about something similar few weeks ago: the male Y-Chromosome is decaying and will be gone in the future (don't remember, between 10 and 100 thousand years from now) but I doubt that there will even still be a human race at that point, so it's a moot point. In this case, I wonder if scientists are underestimating evolution. Won't the individuals that do mutate to be unisex or male-to-female end up not being able to breed and thus have no effect on future generations? Maybe the individuals that don't mutate have more resiliant DNA or better DNA repair systems; this could even increase species fitness, not lead to extinction. Just my uninformed speculation, but still worth considering.
that's so largly fucked up(that it's going on) that it defies comment. I would be really happy if society would take these threats as seriously as they do the newest fashions, in order to hasten their resolution.
may be we will evolve to the point of being able to change sex depending on the enviroment that we are in. like some frogs can
