In order for the History Channel to air it must have government funding. An' don't you think that if the government really did demolish their own buildings, killing tens of thousands of Americans in the process they would make sure that none of their stations would advertise against them? Loose Change was not funded by the government an' it had no government strings attached to it's production. When people become too smart they are always silenced in one way or another. Due to the fact that the creators of Loose Change were to widely known an' looked up to the government couldn't dispose of them personally. So it had to find ways to refute their claims. Which still don't work too well if you've noticed.
History channel did not have to be funded by the government. You are living under the assumption that everything the government does MUST be a lie. There is no point in arguing with you. Its like arguing with a Nillist. Technically, Loose Change was funded by several Left Wing and Democratic senators and congressmen. Over the past few weeks, I have lost all trust in the left, the Peace movement, the environmental movement and the hippie movement. My eyes have been opened. The government isn’t the enemy you are. You are the enemies of yourselves. You say the government has control of all media and they don’t want you to know it, and yet ALL MEDIA is saying that. So does the government really have control? No. They don't even want it. In fact, its not the GOP or right wing commentators that are trying to gain control, and make the "fairness" doctrine. its the left wing trying to keep the Republicans from expressing their point of view. How can the Right Wing be in control of Hollywood if almost every movie to come out this year was Anti War and Anti Bush? Why is it when one of those few movies that isn't some giant flaming piece of liberal propaganda comes out, we have hundreds in the streets, saying its "Propaganda!" because it doesn’t portray our soldiers as a bunch of murderous maniacs? Why is it that Gore won a Nobel over a woman who risked her own life to save thousands of orphaned Jewish children? What did Gore risk? Nothing. He even made a small fortune off of it. Then he took his private jet back to his mansion and ate food that had to be shipped just for him, causing a giant carbon footprint just in winning? Why is it that when a solider dies in the line of fire, the parents and family of that soldier have to deal with hippies spitting on his grave at the funeral? I've seen the world without the black shroud of mistrust and liberalism. I am a hippie in only one way. Inner peace. That is all I ever should have been looking for, and I found it. Not through illegal drugs, or from protesting, or refusing to eat meat. No, I found it through opening my eyes that the truth. We have all been lying so much, that our lies have become truth, and no one realizes it
Name me one actual movie this year that was Anti War. An' incase you didn't know it is impossible for a company of any kind to survive in the U.S. if it doesn't have government funding. I do not an' I never have blamed our troops for the war pigs atrocites man. One of my best friends is considering going into the national gaurd. At first I tried to talk him out of the idea, but in the end it's up to the person as to what choice they make. Perhaps you should consider that an' live an' let live man. You may not agree with us "hippies" but our ideas have been around far longer than any Right Wing Left Wing shit. If it wasn't Jesus an' his disciples in the early A.D. it was the Bohemians in the 1600's or the Beatniks an' Hippies in the 50's an' 60's. An' now it's the new an' old hippies an' the punks that have taken up the anti government standard in this century man. No matter what you can say there must be some kind of truth behind what we're about otherwise it wouldn't have survived this long. For heaven's sake even Ben Franklin was anti governmental in many ways.
An' for that matter it is rarely over just pot that people are shot. If you want the real culprit of crime in the U.S. look to the manufactured drugs such as heroin, coke, meth an' all those other nasty drugs man. More than likely the people who did those shootings at your party did it because they were also on some other drug. People died at Woodstock too but it wasn't because of the marijuana that was there, it was because too many people in to tight a space cause problems man.
The Kingdom Rendition In the Valley of Elah Lions for Lambs Micheal Clayton Across the Universe Stardust Shooter 28 Weeks Later The Bourne Ultimatum Those are just the ones I can name off the top of my head. I know there are plenty more. from 2006 Brokeback Mountain Senitinal Syriana Jarhead Stealth
I'm not pinpointing just you. I'm talking about the entire peace movement in general. So what if you have been around for a long time? That doesnt mean anything. i am nto talking about Jesus 200 years ago, or the Bohemians 400 years ago, or even the Hippies 40 and 50 years ago. I am talking about now. History repeats itself, anti-government has been around for a long time. I get it. Anti government isnt anti all government. I am anti government when the government is the evil one. Right now it is not. (at least not the US, France, England, so on) Should it become evil, should it turn to a path I believe is worng, then I will too be anti government. But when is it right and when is it wrong? Right now, the government is correct, just, fair and right. I havent been fed Republican propaganda, I've simply stoped eating the liberal hippie propaganda.
No, the best way would have been be to refuse to break Jew's windows. to refuse to lock people in Dachau. Remember, Hitler killed very few, if any, Jews. The soldiers and the SS killed them. If subordinates didn't do everything they were told, it wouldn't have mattered who Hitler hated. The paradigm switch is not "leaders should be peaceful". The switch is "people should be peaceful." Ignore Alien Instructions!
Well said man. HB I hope that at some point you'll see the blindfold thats been pulled over your eyes an' decide you don't much like bein' led by the ring that Big Brother has put in yours an' almost everyone else's noses man. Maybe I'm blindfolded too with a ring in my nose for my beliefs but at least I don't let others dictate them for me like so many poor souls do in today's generation
Fear and promises of prosperity will win the weak over everytime. Give the people a boogieman, and promise if they tell their children to enlist in armies their lives won't change and if their child may die they will die a hero, and bingo you can create as many wars as you like for whatever resource grab in which you have an interest.
currency is to blame mediocre task's and retarted jobs make more money and more product buy sell buy sell consume destroy its a process that modern man is good at. we should learn from the original people who lived in america they didn't take more then what they needed and they shared.
Calling Stalin a communist is like calling Pontius Pilate a Christian. As for Hitler, read just about any few pages of Mein Kampf and his views of communism will be self evident.And in 1923 we faced exactly the same situation as in 1918. Regardless what type of resistance was decided on, the first requirement was always the elimination of the Marxist poison from our national body. And in my opinion, it was then the very first task of a truly national government to seek and find the forces which were resolved to declare a war of annihilation on Marxism, and then to give these forces a free road; it was their duty not to worship the idiocy of 'law and order' at a moment when the enemy without was administering the most annihilating blow to the fatherland and at home treason lurked on every street corner. No, at that time a really national government should have desired disorder and unrest, provided only that amid the confusion a basic reckoning with Marxism at last became possible and actually took place. If this were not done, any thought of resistance, regardless of what type, was pure madness. -- Hitler, Adolf, "Mein Kampf", Vol II, Ch 15, "The Right of Emergency Defense" But what gave us communism? My answer: the success of the November 1917 Russian revolution was triggered by an attempt of the Kerensky government to order the Petrograd garrison of the Russian army to the front. Every soldier in the garrison knew that at the front he would most likely die of winter cold, a German bullet or starvation. The Petrograd garrison mutinied, the Baltic fleet supported it, and political power ended up in the Congress of Soviets of Workers and Soldiers' Deputies then meeting in Smolny, near Petrograd. It was the military incompetence of the Tsarist regime, together with German arms and German assistance to Ulyanov (Lenin), that gave us communism.
You have a point. Wars will cease when men refuse to fight. That's why I refused United States military service in 1971.