9/11 DEW / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline

9/11 Directed Energy Weapon / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline

By CB_Brooklyn


Lenin, the first Communist dictator after the takeover of Russia in 1917, is widely credited with the following quotation, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."


There are three basic versions of the 9/11 events. Although differences and/or overlapping may occur, the following three versions generally describe what most people believe:


1. OGCT. This is known as the “Official Government Conspiracy Theory”. This version states that a guy from a cave in Afghanistan conspired with 19 boxcutter-wielding Muslims to hijack airplanes, outwit the USA’s entire multi-trillion dollar defense system, and cause the Twin Towers to collapse. This is the version pushed by the government and media as being the truth of 9/11.

2. APCT. I call this the “Alternate Propaganda Conspiracy Theory”. This version states that, more or less, there were hijackings on 9/11, but the planes might have been taken under remote control to ensure they crashed as planned. Airplanes most likely crashed at the Pentagon and Shanksville, but planes definitely did crash into the Twin Towers. The Twin Towers and WTC 7 collapsed from conventional explosives and thermite, and molten metal was found in the rubble. This is the version pushed by the government and media as being the “wacko conspiracy theory” that the “truth movement” believes.

3. REAL. This, simply, is the REAL version, backed by actual evidence, Laws of Physics, and common sense: There were no hijackings, no plane crashes, the corporate media broadcasted cartoons of an airplane impacting the South Tower, and the WTC complex (not just the Towers and WTC 7) was destroyed with Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). The government and media steer clear of these.



Refer to the Lenin-credited quote above.

Is it possible the “truth movement” has been run by the 9/11 perpetrators since day one?

Is it possible that certain individuals have been planted to steer the “truth movement” away from the perpetrators? Is it possible these plants have affiliations with directed energy weapons (DEW)?

Is it even possible that some of these plants are “in on it” while others got suckered in? You be the judge.



***Former Transportation Secretary, Norman Mineta, has ties to the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).

Mineta was Vice President of Lockheed Martin, a sponsor of DEPS.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Mineta
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html

Mineta ensured minimal interference with the DEW by grounding as many commercial airliners as possible during the timeframe of the towers’ destruction.

Mineta steered the “truth movement” toward hijackings and plane crashes by spreading the “Cheney stand down order” hoax.
http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hear..._2003-05-23.htm
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3722436852417384871



***Former BYU physics professor, Steven Jones, has done research at Los Alamos where directed energy weapons are researched.
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/atomic...ic/jones_cv.htm

Jones steered the “truth movement” toward thermite/conventional explosives/molten metal theories. Jones’ molten metal evidence has been shown to be fabricated.
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...id=91&Itemid=60

Jones ridicules the directed energy weapon and TV-Fakery theories with statements such as ”These two are noted for their no-planes-hit-the-Towers theories and for promoting the notion of ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers.”
http://judicial-inc.biz/Steven_Jones_quits_911.htm



***Physicist Greg Jenkins’ has connections to the NSA and DEW:

"This work was supported in part by NSF grant DMR-9705129 and by funding from the NSA."
http://www.physics.buffalo.edu/cerne/reprints/ybco_prl.pdf

Jenkins’ papers were listed in an annual report which also listed at least one manufacturer of directed energy weapons (Rockwell).
http://www.csr.umd.edu/csrpage/publication...nnualreport.pdf
http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/system...at-overview.htm

Jenkins steered the “truth movement” away from directed energy weapons by conducting an ambush interview of Dr Judy Wood. (However, a read of the transcript reveals Dr Wood won the debate hands down.)
http://drjudywood.com/articles/transcript/...transcript.html



***Official at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Van Romero, has ties to the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).

Romero participated in events at DEPS before and after 9/11.
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/DEMSconf03.html
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/EduWksp00.html

Romero steered the “truth movement” toward standard controlled demolition by stating "It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points"
http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/retractions/romero.html

Romero is a controlled demolitions expert. Scroll down a little and note the photo. Does Romero actually think this was caused by a “relatively small amount of explosives”?



***Former Director of the Star Wars program, Robert Bowman, is about as close to directed energy weapons as one can get.

Bowman steered the “truth movement” toward hijackings, and NORAD standing down.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5gio_iR2WE

Although he is in Jim Fetzer’s Scholars group, I have not heard him speaking about Dr Wood’s DEW evidence. I do remember, however, an interview where Bowman states that he “doesn’t fall for conspiracy theories” with regard to controlled demolition.

Bowman has a PhD in Nuclear Engineering. How can he possibly call this a conspiracy theory?





Also of note is the following:

The government contracted with several sponsors of the Directed Energy Professional Society for the NIST (NCSTAR 1) Report:

Boeing - Gold Level Current/Founding Sponsor
Applied Research Associates (ARA) - Silver Level Founding Sponsor
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) - Silver Level Current Sponsor
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html

Dr Judy Wood has discovered that ARA and SAIC are manufacturers of Directed Energy Weapons and have expertise in Psychological Operations (PSYOPS).
http://drjudywood.com/articles/ARA/ARA.html

Dr Wood also discovered two images on ARA’s website that are similar to the World Trade Center. She details this in her Appeal to NIST’s denial of her Request for Correction.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/apics/Appeal_03.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/apics/Appeal_04.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html



The New York Times is a mainstream media source. Do they tell the truth of 9/11 or do they hide it? Why on earth would they help the “truth movement” by publishing evidence of explosives?

The New York Times steered the “truth movement” towards explosives demolitions by publishing the WTC Task Force Interviews.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html...es_full_01.html

However, they redacted evidence for Directed Energy Weapons.
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/02/911-r...inside-wtc.html



Who's Popular On Corporate Media? Who's Not?

*William Rodriguez - publicly speaks up against DEW / TV-Fakery
http://www.911researchers.com/node/555#comment-4089

*David Ray Griffin - pro Global Government (aka New World Order)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-TZypcH9eg

*Steven Jones - pro explosives-demolition, pro thermite, pro molten metal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayYXNo0i_Cs

*Kevin Barrett - supports Steven Jones
http://drjudywood.com/articles/a/KB/Barrett_Kevin.html

*Robert Bowman - expert on NORAD’s jet-scrambling procedures
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5gio_iR2WE


*Judy Wood - never invited to discuss the DEW evidence, despite her filing of an actual court case
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

*Morgan Reynolds - never invited back after discussing TV-Fakery on FOX News
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reQZT9Hzvt8

Reynolds also filed a court case
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&...e1=federal_case

*Jerry Leaphart - mainstream attorney never invited to discuss his clients’ (Wood/Reynolds) 9/11 legal actions


In an interview with Kevin Barrett, trial attorney Jerry Leaphart has said:

"What I can tell you and the listeners, Kevin, is this. There is more admissible evidence associated with the theory that the World Trade Center was destroyed by directed energy weapons than there is admissible evidence for any single other theory out there that has been promulgated."

MP3 Clip: http://drjudywood.com/media/070727_JerryLeaphartRFC_Adm.mp3
Full Show: http://drjudywood.com/media/070727_JerryLeaphartRFCs.mp3

============================================
============================================
============================================


The following is a timeline relating to promotion of the Alternate Propaganda Conspiracy Theory by government plants and the media, and suppression of the REAL version by government plants and media. Also included is suppression of free energy research.


Continued here:
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...d=151&Itemid=60

 

Give it up, shill.

Anyone who needs to use BIG RED LETTERS is in desperate need of attention. Please go away and leave the 9/11 truth movement to the actual truthers.

Real planes hit the twin towers. Witnesses saw and heard them. Nobody takes you seriously...you are a laughing stock.

Anyone who promotes "no planes at the world trade center" is either a hired government agent designed to discredit the real truth movement, or they are equally pathetic in another way. Perhaps they didnt' receive enough affection as children.

Now go away.

 

I find it quite interesting that many well known people within the "truth movement" have affiliations with DEWs, such as Bob Bowman. And some of them speak up against DEWs, such as Steven Jones and Greg Jenkins.

And let's not forget Van Romero's "relatively small amount of explosives" comment, and all the recognition/awards/grants he got afterwards. Romero made presentations at the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS) before and after 9/11!

And of course, Norman Mineta was VP of Lockheed Martin, a Gold-Level sponsor of DEPS.

And NIST contracted with ARA and SAIC; both are sponsors of DEPS.


One must ask themselves... what are all these DEW-affiliated people doing in and around the truth movement? Why are they here? And why do they speak up against DEW evidence?

Be sure to check out the FULL timeline on checktheevidence.com for all the information:
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=151&Itemid=60



2000, Winter - DEPS’ Newsletter “Wave Front”

The first article in Volume 1, Issue 1 of Wave Front starts with the following quote:

"Lasers in space, lasers in the stratosphere, lasers
on and over the battlefield - we're at the
beginning of an evolutionary new wave of
weaponry."
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/graphics/wavefront2.pdf

 

And this is why the 9/11 truth movement is failing...because some people go running around yelling and screaming about how there were cartoon airplanes with mini-nukes/DEW's from the death star in orbit/holographic airplanes with speakers projecting sound/cruise missiles with holographic elfs with lighsabers cutting through the steel because planes cant.....Seriosuly...Yes it was an inside job by our govt...yes they were real planes. Please...stop the insanity so the movement can gain a little bit of credibility. You know, i wonder how much of these crazy ass theories is actually the govt. trying to discredit the movement.

 

But who said this? Do you have any examples? DEW's from the death star in orbit? What the hell does that mean? If you have nothing to back this up, then you're being just as disingenuous as the people you're attacking.

Directed-energy weapons ARE in orbit, on satellites, and they were put there under the STAR WARS project that Bob Bowman was a part of. DEW's don't necessarily have to be space-based, either.

I personally don't know what brought down the towers, but it wasn't thermate -- at least not thermate alone, because thermate doesn't explain the pulverization and resulting energy release (along with the toasted cars, etc).

Why is it so bizarre to question the idea that maybe UNCONVENTIONAL devices were used to bring down the towers with such speed and precision? The technology the shadow government has is DECADES ahead of what the public is allowed to know about. Why would they use something as old-fashioned as thermate, when they likely have something that would work much better, which wouldn't entail rigging the entire building (a very tedious process without being caught), as is the case with traditional controlled demolitions?

And yes, I feel it is important that we look into the background of the people who are being promoted by the Truth Movement to tell us that conventional explosives and conventional explosives alone brought down the towers, and that if we question this notion we are somehow plants. I can guarantee you the 9/11 Truth Movement is controlled and steered by government plants. The people at the forefront of the Truth Movement were put there for a reason.

The Truth Movement wasn't taken over. It was a COINTEL op from the beginning. Why else would it be receiving so much attention from the mainstream press? Why would an establishment mouthpiece like C-SPAN promote people like Alex Jones and David Ray Griffin if there wasn't some ulterior motive behind it?

Why do those who call themselves CRITICAL THINKERS conveniently choose to gloss over this?

 

i really think all this hair spliting and day after speculation as to how it was done, is very much of a smoke screen away from why it was done and that it was crystal nockt, NOT pearl harbour!

of course i realize all this is with the good intention of proving that, but it, for the most part, really just detracts from doing so instead.

=^^=
.../\...

 

I agree with everything you said EXCEPT the first part of your first sentence. Our movement is NOT failing. That's why the infiltrator tactics are so unrelenting at this point. They realize the potential our movement has and to be sure, it is NOT failing. We've actually been very successful, so far. Even the mainstream media has been recently forced to cover these issues.

 

I'm just not buying this. Sorry, but that's something the establishment would WANT us to believe in order to make us despair. I refuse to believe it. David Ray Griffin is a god-send to our movement. Stop making us believe that WEthePeople are so weak that we can't even start up our own movements anymore.

Sure the government is NOW trying to steer the movement, but they did not, in any way, shape, or form, START the movement. No way. And even if they did, we sure as hell have put up a good fight in terms of grabbing the steering wheel from them.

Also, we're not just a 9/11 truth movement. We're an anti-false flag/anti-imperialist movement...to end all forms of tyranny and slavery. We're a global justice movement.

 

The so called "911 truth movement" crowd are the biggest bunch of fucking morons on the planet.

 

Very articulate and profound statement for a 49 year old! Can I have my 6 year old niece give you some vocabulary lessons so that next time you can hit it out of the park?

If you want to be taken seriously, it's necessary to back up your claim(s) with sources (or at least logic). You've done neither and indeed, you sound like what you claim the 9/11 truth and justice movement is: a moron.

 

Your like a broken record. Anyone with even a quarter of a brain laughs out loud at the so called "911 truth movement". All that crap has been proven easily false by better folks than I. No need for me to repeat it.

Don't worry kid, I won't ruin your delusions in this thread any more.