http://www.cracked.com/article_15643_5-scientific-reasons-zombie-apocalypse-could-actually-happen.html i was watching 28 weeks later earlier tonight...i probably shouldn't have read that....
i agree. too much was shot in the dark and you couldn't see what was going on. i liked the storyline though.
Eh, I didn't feel any emotional bond with the characters which was why the first film was so good. The second film tried to duplicate that, and the characters seemed a little to stock for me. I think 28 days was primarily a drama rather then a horror. And you just can't make a good sequel with drama.
Twin brothers who come to believe their on a mission from god to kill mafia. You said you like action flicks. It's a good one. http://quicksilverscreen.com/watch?video=16891
I dont know why alot of people like boondock saints........ it was okay, just not really what people made it out to be. 28 days later was awesome, but I prefer dawn of the dead...... the original one from 1978
I'm not generally a huge fan of the horror genre. I usually find it predictable. Romero certainly has his day when it comes to the zombie genre. Undeniably.
ive had a series of zombie dreams before and i always seem to end up okay in the end soo im not too worried, its all about how you act around the zombies, if they think your one of them they probably wont attack you
hmmm........ you sure?? I try to act like a dog, but I still get attacked...... I think zombies can smell whether or not you are alive or the living dead....
Yeah, I mean the whole horror genre as a whole, not Romeros work. There are gems in the horror genre to be sure.