Seriously I like girls with a little more than just skin and bone. I mean, I kinda have a fetish for legs and what would legs be without thighs right? so Sticks arent really my thing ;D. However we aren't all of one mind in te world are we ,D
I think the girl in the middle is more on the really thin side... Maybe it's just cause i can see her hip bone and innertheigh bone [?] show.
Some women are just naturally very thin to the point where their ribs poke out. What the difference between poking fun at a naturally skinny person or a naturally fat person? Like SirRubin has said: It's all about taste. I find it sexy.
i'll second the rib crib for sure! as for the three 'girl' pix, the all look pretty much the same, size wise, to me, like the way the clothes horse industry demands. less then or equal to +/- 20% of everything other then hight seems would be equally attractive to me, and while i've nothing against however tall anyone was born to be, i do find shorter more attractive myself. shorter, much shorter then the 'modeling' industry demands or seems to be selected for in 'beauty' contests either. =^^= .../\...
it is the exact same thing. though i don't really see a problem with discussing truthfully within the confines of a conversation that we don't find it attractive. but the jokes do get old really fast.
hmm well i think liking someone cos they eat is a bit different than liking someone cos they dont eat?? i dont mean i only like guys who workout and go to the gym but i like a man that has some meat on him.
i have to confess, my standards for men are way more lax than my standards for women. i have a specific sort and that's that. there's twice as many women as there are men. jeez, i have way more a spectrum for women. though, ideals and the beauty of actual women? honestly, women are glorious and amazing...man. wow. who can deny it? women of all sort. i'm still utterly dying for a piece of christine.