yah, thats true. or at least, thats what the beatles said. I have no idea what bob dylans side of the story is.
he doesn't wan't to attract authorities, he's smart for not even admitting doing drugs. But Bob Dylan is a stoner.
Man you're talking shit, maybe he does or did, or maybe he never has, but who are you to say he is a stoner, you're just going on shit you heard and you would prefer to think of him as stoner than not cos it'd ruin your ideals of him being a cool stoner.
I think its more understandable for Paul to write (in teh last decade or so) that Bob got beatles stoned, and that bob dylan is saying he didnt to protect his media record for his own reasons; than Paul to completely fabricate a story that tags Dylan as a stoner, and for sneaking weed past police, and then distributing it.
Doesnt Bob say on Rain Day Woman #25 "everybody must get stoned?" I could give a rats ass if he does or not but it seems wierd to hear that Dylan would have said he doesnt smoke. Maybe he was being interviewed by his 12 year old or something. Or better yet he probably said "yes, actually sir i love the sweet herb and smoke it copiously from dusk til dawn in a handmade peruvian golden indian pipe" but it came out like "Yurdel yurdel yurdel ....." cuz bob is so incoherent and someone took that as a "no" His publiscist perhaps.
I've always wondered what he meant on rainy day women, like getting high, or getting stones thrown at you.
i have this book called "spliffs" and theres a whole chapter about dylan and his pot shenenagans. theres even a giant picture of him with a nice rolled up number in his hand.
