Can beasters be considered dank? I've had some pretty nice looking beasters in the past, although they do tend to cost quite a bit of money considering they aren't 'headies'. So what do you think?
you can sell them as dank but they smoke like bad mids. they also give you a headacehe so i say stay away
I dunno the beasters I usually get dont taste that bad and def dont give me a headache. They also dont cost quite a bit of money either.
i never even heard of beasters or even dank until i came here, no one around where i live says either of those
Beasters are generally a commercially grown mass produced real dense nug from canada. Heres a shot of some beasters I had a while back
Ive had some really good beasters and some really shitty beasters which I call upgraded mids. I dont mind selling them but as far as smoking, if I dont have super danks and only can get mids they are the way to go...
Beasters are better than average mids, and worse than KB. I laugh at all my little stoner friends who think they bought this super dank weed when i know for a fact its beasters. They'll say "look at that weed, how can you say this isn't headies"? I try telling them to SMELL the weed. If it was really as dank as it looks, it would tase/smell like god damn chemicals. I compare Beasters to Lil Wayne. FAKE!
I consider beasters in the same category as mids. But like any grade pot every now and again its possible to get a frankenbud that some times seems to be better than the average beasters. Allthough what Im smoking right now is beasters and they arent anything special just your typical beast, but last night they got me higher than Ive been in a while. But I blame that on taking a huge rip off a bong because I had a brain fart and neglected the fact that I was hitting a bong and the smoke pretty much got black in the chamber due to the fact that I forgot that I needed to eventually clear it. It sucked for a couple min but then was amazing.
