Ron Paul's H.R. 1146?

I am deciding more and more that Ron Paul will get my vote in the next election.. however right after he plans to get elected he wants to propose H.R. 1146.. stating to release us from the United Nations and all of their affairs. How do you feel about that? Wouldn't that just ruin our relationships even more?

 

Ron Paul can suck a dick. Who would vote for someone with two first names? haha. joking. but you can take it seriously if you want. =)

 

no way!!! that would fuck everything beyond unfuckability. I doubt ron's that dumb.

 

the UN is a mess, it is a body of people who have no power and a weak military. The UN causes alliances which i think are bad and Thomas Jefferson would agree. Also the UN i a march to one world government that will bring the world in a world of trouble. we already see government mergers by the UN and the proposed NAU. I am in part an isolationist except for trade and America need to hold onto the Monroe Doctrine a little more seriously
Now a fun fact: my 5th cousin Cordell Hull was Sec. of State from 1933-1944 under FDR and he was one of the main framers of the UN, and even got a Nobel Peace Prize for that reason in 1945.

 

The UN is a corrupt, subversive body that was created by the British and American Elite following WWII to become the eventual world government under the New World Order. The UN has been working since its inception in 1945 to erode the national sovereignty of member nations with international laws and treaties that have nothing to do with the common good of the people of this planet. It's all about creating a standardized system of global control. Most people are unaware that the UN now controls vast areas of land in the United States, including many of our national parks, which have been designated as UNESCO heritage sites, with surrounding "buffer zones" also controlled by the UN.

I suggest some of you look into the history of the UN. Look into former UN Secretary-General, Kurt Waldheim, a nazi SS officer in WWII. Look into some of the atrocities committed by the UN in Somalia and other countries. Look into how the UN gives oppressive countires like China "most favorable nation" status. Anyone who treasures their freedom and believes in sovereign nations should be opposed to a dangerous and totalitarian-seeking organization like the UN.

Many people have been brainwashed by the media and the public school system to think that the UN is a good thing, when the people behind it are some of the most ruthless and murderous people in the world, whose goal is nothing short of enslaving the entire population of the planet.



UN "peacekeepers" torture a Somali child over fire

Ask yourself why atrocities, such as that seen above, were suppressed by the American media.

 

U.N. = crazy dictators club..

we have no business in such a organization much less funding it..

i support getting out 100%

 

Strictly playing devil's advocate because i hate the idea of a one world government as much as anyone, but with all these little shitsplat countries going nuclear wouldn't a one world gov't or governing bodies such as the UN keep us ( as a race) from annihilating ourselves.
Edit: Will the threat of mutual destruction keep peace forever?

 

Absolutely not, because all this talk about countries going nuclear is simply fear-mongering that's being used by the globalists to get the people to accept whatever agenda the government has. It's highly unlikely that any country, especially Iran, would use nukes against a country like Israel or the US, when they know they would be obliterated in a matter of minutes. This is simply the lies that are being sold to control people and keep them in fear so they can be manipulated and controlled.

 

i'm thinking more like india and pakistan

 

They're not going to attack the US, Pakistan especially, which is controlled by the West. Musharraf is a puppet of the US government.

 

Neuclear holocaust..... it or somthing of its magnitude is going to happen eventualy weither its neuclear, viral, or some other shit. All it will take is one of those "shitsplat countries" to launch and all the other trigger happy nations would just start bombing.

thats the problem with super weapons as a form of status quo and idiots... lol

and i don't think having one unified country would help because some factions always gunna be pissed off and is going to do something fucking stupid and extreme, and then we'll either be at square one again or they'll be put down.

then again these are just my opinions.

 

Ron Paul is against everything.

 

That's what i'm thinking is all it takes is one loose cannon going after another and it could trigger a domino effect, but how could a one world gov't stop extremist factions short of an orwellian big brother system of martial law. those who would sacrifice their freedoms for safety deserve neither. I wonder what franklin would say to a person like oppenheimer, the destroyer of worlds.

 

doesn't really matter anymore. he needs to drop out so obama can take billary

 

gravel FTW!

 

What difference does it make if it's Obama or Hillary? Both have been groomed and vetted by the establishment, which is the same establishment they'll be taking their orders from if elected (or should I say selected). Politics is a sham designed strictly for the public. The big boys at the top control all sides. Presidents and "elected officials" are merely the frontmen put on display for the public to believe are the ones running the show, when they're in fact merely puppets for the real powers behind the scenes.

 

Wow man. Dont discusse politics if you dont know what your talking about. Paul isent running against Obama or Clinton. Hes a REPUBLICAN!!!

 

that was stupid i've been staring at CNN's pie graph's too long

 

i wish i could delete that

 

^You can. Just edit it.