The U.S. Constitition is fa, fa, fa foolin'

How can you be for the U.S. Constitution?

Hear me out before you answer: I'm not apart of foolin myself anymore and so should you not be either foolin yourself. It's like why have a constitution that looks and sounds nice and dandy, when it aint being followed? The things therein the U.S. constitution are intentionally made to have to be argued in court after a breach put intentioanlly arguable. One would have to argue in court a breach of their constitional rights since it was deceivingly put for being argued. Therefore I dont care for this U.S. constitution that's null and void even by the damn government that relies on you not having the funds to go to court an argue the arguable. If it takes your time and your money to make the constitution stand up for you, then it is all see-through bullcrap.

We'd be better off surely "by" (not under) another country's constitution or whatever they have if that country firmly stands by their's to every word without it having to be argued in some court, whether or not it's completely dandy and nice. Yeah, the U.S. need to drop it's ego and hand over presidential, congressional, and military authority to another country (Russia) as I revealed in another topic which would boost that then other country's economy that authority has been handed over to. That's right, this would become the former U.S. territory and be labeled Russia's New Russia.

Anyhow, an "arguable" Constitition is no damn good. Can any of you understand that yet? We need a clear put firm unarguable/non-negociable (sp?) Constitution that ppl and their government must stand by through the good, the bad, and the ugly no matter what. If it wont be like that then we'll fall for everything every time into a nation of corruption by the governement and for the government. And now here breeds ppl who turn corrupt in the judging eyes of the corrupt who just want to fight fire with fire in circomstances under their corrupt government.

Name me all the countries that dont have an arguable type consititution.

Argueable types leave leaway for corruption and misconduct and mistreament to drop upon persons before going to a court they shouldnt have to and after coming from that court as that stuff proceeds any ol way because no one is following a constition they can not follow since it aint clearly firm in standing. The truely crooked use that to their advantage.

So I say out with the arguable, in with the unarguable. If you are still liking the U.S. constitution then you are the fool that must like endless arguments that can go different ways which brings about division. Once you're apart of that back-n-forth division you leave yourself open to be conquered by the corruption that eats like cancer. We need and must have a constitution, but not the U.S. Constitution.

Think of the ppl that wrote the U.S. constitution... They should have been hung for fa, fa, fa foolin'.

Now what do you think about the U.S. Constitution? Do you consider yourself a true patriot that stands by it?

 

Aint it a pitty how one has to get approval by someone when your constitutional rights have been breached to even have the problem seen through? And aint it a pitty when the one who does the approval is usually siding with who breached your rights cause they're government (gang) related? Why cant it be a sure fact that one got their rights breached and that justice should be served? It's because the Constitution is arguable.

Try to go the mile with them and they've set you back a 2 miles. Cant relie on the arguable constitution that no one follows when it's to their convenience? Then take matters into your own hands. Then you'll be labeled crooked when they the ones crooked to where it should be seen you cant go through them to accomplish anything just. The U.S. constitution is failing us as it was designed to.

 

Even the Soviet Union had a bill of rights. And just like ours, it was a meaningless scrap of paper.

 

I prefer to have the ability to have redress for any wrongs than live in a state that tells me I have not ever been wronged. And you seem to be basing your proposal simply on economic outcome. Are we to live our lives based on what is good for the market alone, to hell with humanity and personal rights? Perhaps you would like us to abdicate to China.

The US Constitution has it's flaws, but many fewer than living in a totalitarian market driven state. The Constitution is not failing us, it is those that have been elected to protect it and serve it and instead manipulate it and profit from their misuse of power, and it is the voters that vote based on sound bites instead of reasonable longterm thinking.

 

Nice Def Leppard reference.

 

You don't like the U.S. constitution because we can amend it? Or because we can question each other and our leaders about it's language and meaning? Because we need to present evidence in a courtroom when we feel the state has violated it?

I'm not getting your point, if you actually have one.

 

the problem with our constitution is that it wasnt specific enough, which leaves some things open for debate. the founding fathers couldnt have forseen the issues that we face today, such as abortion, international terrorism, or stem cell research. they couldnt know that our freedoms would be picked apart and the rules bent by fear mongering leaders 200 years later. but having a flawed bill of rights is better than having no bill of rights. we the people have become complacent. we must stand up and demand our rights. the american revolution is not over. we won our rights from great britain, now we have to protect them from our own government.

come on. russia?!? so we should trade one corrupt government for another even more corrupt government? that may be the most rediculous statement ive ever heard.