Porn Star donations?

Little child is dying in a hospital and needs a lung transplant. Porn star says she will donate $50,000.00 to help the child. Hospital denies donation saying that pornography is a abominatoin, since its a christian run hospital. is this wrong?

I dont even know if they can transplant lungs cause this is a hypotetical question.

I think it is wrong to deny the money, what do you think?

 

No. Duh.

 

i think the hospital should take the money and use it to cut open the pornstar and give her the shitty lung because she corrupts our youth!

 

to funny underwear.lol

 

wow,
seriously...where has our definition of right and wrong gone...sometimes...one person can make a differance and it matters not what their title is...fucking AYE! grow a fucking brain...

 

Of course it's wrong to deny it. Theres no question.

 

i wonder how the kid feels about this situation...

 

Aroused.

 

I get exactly what your saying jerry420, but also could the porn star make the donation anonymously so not to draw media attention.

but what difference is there to a regular Movie star thats takes their clothes off on screen, to one that has better on screen skills while taking their clothes off?

 

why not just donate it to the parents of the child? then the hospital can't say jack shit

 

jesus tapdancing christ man!
who gives a fuck but you?

 

Wouldnt be me that cares, I dont care either way, Give the kid a lung, or take them to the Linda Lovelace Memorial Hospital.

 

in this case, i'm especially against the hospital's decision

 

I think a good set of lungs would pay for themselfs in the end.

 

I think there is something wrong with Christian hospitals is what I think.

 

It is wrong.

 

They made the right decision in refusing the money.

 

do you feel the porn star is out of line for trying to make such a donation to a christian hospital.. just to recieve publicity, if the donation infomation wasnt made public would it be ok then?

 

No, the porn star is free to offer whatever he/she wants. The donation, public or not, ought not be accepted in this case.

That the christian church operates by different principles from atheistic principles ought to be obvious. That their rejection of the offer of charity from a morally bankrupt source is one of those principles may not be so obvious.

 

I agree, thank you for elaborating.