has romance died?

I'm still a virgin!
Go me!


But yeah, that's another reason I'm not gonna fuck anyone for awhile, because every guy i know is an immature retard who are being laid by other retarded whores who couldn't tell the difference between a dick or a tampon

I most deffinutly DO NOT want to end up like everyone else in my school which is why i'm not fucking anyone until i'm at least out of high school.

 

Ok.

My grandmother had my mother at 13. That was only a bit earlier than the NORM in those days.

I just think people have this image of earlier generations as more conservative. Stereotypically.

But I might be wrong.

 

+ Even Shakespeare, the like fucking king of romantic's, got his wife knocked up before they were married

 

great for your grandma, but generally, 13 is REALLY young for having a kid. I'd get disowned for that, haha.

I knooow earlier generations had lots of sex. And thank god I wasnt around during the hippie era, i'd be the annoying celibant bitch in the background everyone was afraid to talk to

I just simply think it's still starting earlier and its still taken a little more less seriously then other eras, is all.

 

ahahah

nooo way am I giving one of the fuckheads in my highschool the satisfaction of using me to bust a nut when theyre just gona move on to the next girl in a little bit

besides...the sex would suck. theyre not big and manly, theyre stupid and teenage-ey.

 

Exactly.

I remember this chick in college. She dressed slutty, was always talking about dicks, and guys, and blow jobs, and shit like that.

When did I find out she was a virgin? When I had sex with her.

I was 19 then, so...long time ago.

But yeah, I think the only difference is that people talk more openly about sex than before.

The other difference is that males don't lose their virginities in brothels anymore. When they are like, 11. Taken in by daddy who was "teaching them how to be a man" etc.

But yeah, no Woodstock these days. No Hellfire Club either.

 

lmfao
Well, then again, would you want you're first fuck to break you because they are so big? Then you're twat would be extreamly large and this would be very upseting

 

On the issue of KNOWING who's actually fucking who, it might be the case that in tight-knit Long Island communities etc., that's the case.


But here in the city, it's simply impossible to know. Go to a bar, you'll see a couple make out for HOURS, and then the guy gets ditched. A common sight.

 

Thats a myth im pretty sure. Ive fingered a huge slut before and she was tighter then a virgin.

Pushing out a kid would though.

 

the most we have now a days are parties at one persons house who doesn't care if someone if fucking on their bed.

Oh, we also have Ozzfest
I know a guy who fucked some random chic in a porda paudy [sp?] because he was stoned off his ass and the girl said "You look hot"

 

men have small dicks too, hate to break it to you, lol.

i'm hoping to score with an average man,who i love and who loves me and who knows what hes doing.

so i keep my perfectly not large twat andddd I get the good sex

 

it might just be LI haha.

 

lmao
I know that, i have met the one inch wonder, lol

thats what we all hope for, lol

 

well, my bf hasnt forgotten about romance... he takes care of me and i take care of him. romance should be reciprocal, expecting one person to shower the other in adoration and romantic notions is ridiculous

 

romance still exists, and it comes in many different flavors.

 

romance still exists; you just don't see it because women prefer to be with assholes who like to hurt them than actual "romantic" types...

 

Yes its gone, its never coming back. Dont make me vomit my own lungs out, I might die thinking about how lame romance is... *cringes to death*
everyones out to fuck you around.

 

ask frank zappa. i think what happens, when you beat anything to death, people get tired of it.

you know, love, back in the sixties, used to be all about compassion, about giving a dam about EVERYONE else, not just addicting a person of the prefered gender to yourself emotionally and perhapse erotically.

romantic love has alway been to some degree something of a cleche'. not that there's anything all that wrong with people have strong emotional feelings for each other. but dam, sometimes you have to get up and go to the bathroom too!

what i mean is, whatever you get out of sex, or companionship otherwise, that really ISN'T the begining and end of all gratification. nor can you rationally expect any from emparing your judgemet, living on the edge of excitement, nor trying to impress anyone either. if you let yourself get conned out of creating and exploring, you never experience true happiness as long as you are.

sure some other things are good things too, and sex can feel real good for a few minuetes or whatever, but if you ain't got creating and exploring, you ain't got shit. and i mean creating and exploring yourself, not to pay someone else to do it for you vicariously either.

=^^=
.../\...

 

Good post, my man.

I mean, there is a difference between emotional excitement and intimacy which isn't dependency.

But I understand your point.

I see you're constantly referring to creating and exploring. My two points of reference are autonomous intimacy and productivity.

 

Well, women prefer men who aren't needy.

There are assholes, and there are non-assholes in that category.

Either way, there are women out there who are needy and have nothing going for themselves, but that's not the ones you like probably. So...SAME damn thing.