This is a great article about the Bush family's ties to Hitler and the Nazis. Please take a couple minutes to read it. http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1312484,00.html
I guess you're not going to buy a beetle either, since Hitler had to do with them. And I only believe half of the stuff I see and none of the stuff I read in the news.
The Guardian is a well-respected, British-based, independent media source. You're not going to read stuff like this in the mainstream press. Hell, you didn't even read the article, so shut up before you make yourself look any more ignorant. And what does this have to do with VW's? Yes, I am well aware of the Volkswagen/Hitler thing. Most people know about that... big deal. I don't like Beetles anyway.
Yes I did read the article. I just think it's funny how all this stuff pos up around election time. I just think better the devil you know then the one you don't. Sorry I wasn't trying to piss you off.
That is crazy about Aushcwitz....makes complete sense though, why would the allied bombers have neglected to destroy at least the rail lines leading to it..... Quote: I just think better the devil you know then the one you don't the most piss poor reason I've heard yet for supporting any political figure
Well what does this have to do with Dubya? I doubt that he was in cahoots with the Nazi party. So try again.
The fact of the matter is, Prescott Bush, Father Bush's Grandfather, funded hitler and the nazi party, it is a clear example of the Bush Crime Family Funding a madman to start a war and make loads of money, just as they did when they funded and armed saddam. http://www.infowars.com/print/Bush/grandfather_helped_nazi.htm http://www.hermes-press.com/crimes.htm Peace and Love, Dan
As i have said many times, the Bush Family was not alone in this funding. IBM was a HUGE supporter of Hitler. But no one ever brings that fact to light.
So was the Catholic church, you can't complain about what people did 65 years ago, I mean serriously, if I was alive in 1940-41, and I owned a mjaor business in a neutral country, I'd probably support Hitler since it seemed like Germany was gonna crush everything in its path.
You dont have the right to complain from now on, if someone or some entity kills you and your family for earning more money.
Well you know, supporting any side in war is technically killing anyone by that logic, I could argue that anyone who brought war bonds caused the deaths of millions of people around the Earth by American bombs and ammunition.
Oh do tell what juicy insider details about Bush you have! Please tell me one good comparision between Goering and Rumsfield or one between Powell and Ribbentrop or another one between Chao and Speer
Hitler and his administration burned the reichstag to take away the peoples civil liberties, which eventually lead to the police state http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/reich.html http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/riseofhitler/burns.htm Bush and his administration killed 3,000+ people in the WTC and Pentagon to take away the people's civil liberties, which will, in turn, most likely end up in a police state. http://www.serendipity.li/wtc2.htm http://www.nogw.com/9_11.html Peace and Love, Dan
You offer me a conspiracy theory? Try again. I want a real sense of how similar Powell and Ribbentrop are.
They aren't conspiracy theories. Cold, hard facts. There are plenty of books that clearly illustrate the connections, the motivations, and the evidence.
I'd compare Ashcroft to Himmler and Karl Rove to Heydrich who was Himmler's dirty tricks man. Just do a search on Prescott Bush and you'll find alot of dirt on him. Most is in very credible mainstream newspapers. I've done lots of reaserch on Nazi Germany. Compare Nazi Germany to modern day America and its down right scarry. Why would any one that is gonna vote for Bush post on here? After all Bush is the antithesis of what hippies stand for and believe in. He's pro-war,pro big business, and tramples on the environment and the Constitution. "What good fortune for governments that the people don't think"-Adolf Hitler
Technically, (logically) supporting any side in a war is (help) killing someone. But you can not perceive and handle social behaviours (such as war and peace) "technically" (or mathematically). Because life is full of irrationalities one of them is humans. So if everybody rejects to use arms, there would not be any wars. Technically, this is right. But surprisingly not true. You see, in this case the difference between what's right and what's true is ethics. If american people are fighting on the field and you as an american benefit from that by being secure in your homeland and yet try to raise your company's profit at the cost of betraying your fellow citizens and justify your action by claiming that any manager's duty requires raising profit margins, then people would call you a bastard. Because once again you see, what is right sometimes is not what should be done. People have priorities and that is defined by ethics (that thin and hardline drawn above). And lastly, you CAN complain about things people have done 65 years ago, so that those things dont happen today.