need advice uncut man

i am in sort of a strange situation or maybe not. my new boyfriend is uncut which is new to me. i am experienced in all aspects of sex but this one. it is like trying to learn to ride a bike.

so what i need help with is this, the things that have worked to please my man in the past, do not work on my uncut man. i knew that somethings would feel diffrent, but did not know that it would be like being a virgin starting from scratch.

so any help regarding this would be greatly appreciated. tips, advice, positions that work for uncut men. the works.

also i tend to get a little rough when i get further into a realationship is there any issues with that, uncut men let me know. what is okay and what will get me a black eye. lol

 

I don't know what to tell you. I'm uncut, but I can't think of anything that you would do to a circumcised penis that wouldn't "work" for me.

 

I am uncut also and theres isnt anything diffrent about it that i know i do know that i am very sensitive after i cum so i dont like my cock head licked or anything like that after i cum.

 

Presumably this is a post from an American.
Its weird because in the UK you see all kindsa programmes like nip tuck, Seinfeld, sex and the city and being uncut (though in our way of thinking its not that someone is 'uncut' but someone is circumsized) comes up in the content like its bizaar and strange. So it seems the only people in this word who get cut are Jews and Yanks.
We watch these programmes bewildred and its like us saying to you guys 'what? You still breath using your lungs? Crazy!'

 

nicknack - Muslims are also cut (600+million of them worldwide), as are South Koreans, Filipinos, and many Africans. Also a lot of New Zealanders, Australians, Canadians and older Brits. So Jews and Americans are not alone in following this ancient and healthy practice.

 

Older Brits I don't think that is the case, and being in London Aussies and NZ's everywhere so know many, and its not the case with them, but who's to say.
Mind you, I guess I was stating more for a western point of view than Asian etc with the muslims.

 

Don't mind Cutted. He's convinced anyone who is anyone important or 'special' is circumcised. I've been disagreeing with him for years. UK never did circumcise, except in posh circles. Oz & Kiwis never did either. Some Tribal and Muslim Africa cut, but that still leaves half the continent natural. South America, Central America and Canada remain free of the knife - except for those Canadians who wish they were Americans. Europe, Asia and a few civilized sections of the US are natural. All the middle east and the parts which have escaped with their religion intact are not intact, but it is amazing just how many Muslim immigrants to the UK and France have decided to forgo the loss of the 4skin. So your humor stands, nicknack!
As for goodiegirlxxx, I just can't imagine what different kind of sex we natural men require. Stand us all at attention and we are supposed to look the same. Unless, maybe, he is one of the few whose skin doesn't pull all the way back in erection. If so, he can change that with a Dr's advice if HE wants, but the feeling is still the same under that layer of skin which keeps his glan super sensitive. Treat him as you would any mutilated guy, results should be the same.

 

From what I remember reading Fastswitch, the head of the penis is designed as such so the protective foreskin can pull back and stay in place exposing the head when erect, thus allowing a free flow of semen for impregnation. Other theories suggest also that it is designed as such that if an animal is to mate with a female, the bulbus head can scoop out (sorry for graphic detail haha) the semen that may have been left before by another lucky beast.
Sometimes if you're not superhard the foreskin will rub over the head during your thrusts during sex, but no biggy as that's how guys who are uncut would normally masturbate. Though a little more patience buy stimulating the shaft instead (presumably that's how cut guys do it) can give greater intesity in the climax. Also I find that doing it that way helps with sex as we would normally ignore that part for stimulous in masturbation, though rely on when it comes to sex.
As for techniques for goodiegirl, in sex I don't think it matters. Though it hand jobs you can play with the head more when things are erm dry, as the foreskin is there to help.

 

Nicknack - many older Brits (born before 1950, when National Health decided to no longer pay for circumcision) are circumcised, especially the Eton-Oxbridge public school set. So if you are a Brit and over 60, there is a good chance you are. Aussies and New Zealanders have traditionally followed the lead of the Brits, and as the rate of circumcision declined there, it did in those countries too. However, a New Zealand 25 year study showing that uncut guys have a 50+% greater chance of getting an STD may change that. And Canadians, influenced by U.S. practices, have always had a fairly large percentage cut, especially in the English-speaking provinces.

And guys with "loose cuts" like me, retaining a lot of foreskin, can masturbate just like you do.

 

Not sure what you mean there Cutted. That first sentence is noncense. The NHS came in to being in 1948, so that leaves a two year gap of the NHS may or may not cutting off the foreskin, if indeed it was common practice by them to do so. It was not common practice for babies to have this done before the NS came into being.
As for Eton and Oxbridge... do you know what percentage of the country that would be? 0.01 perhaps? And I'm not sure why they would ve having it wippid off.
Sorry, this country is au natral.

 

Ya just have to love the internet....

History of circumcision: http://www.cirp.org/library/history/

 

When the NHS came into being, they had to decide what is covered and what is not, and they decided about 1950 not to cover circumcision. So most Brits under 60 are uncut. Ask some of your older folks if they are cut, and I bet they are (if you dare do this). Or google the subject. Male members of the British royalty have traditionally been circumcised. And I read that Diana did not want her sons cut, but that they did have it done after she died.

 

CIRP is an anti-circumcision website, so it should be looked at from that perspective.

 

To the original poster: quite frankly, if I had to have sex with a circumcised or mutilated girl (like a cut Muslim girl or a cut African girl), I wouldn't know what to do either.

So I understand your questions.

My two cents:

-circumcised men are not in the original state of nature; so it is to them that you should pay special attention (and buy lube, use lots of saliva, be careful that condoms don't break because of any crusts or hard scarred tissue, etc...)

-all natural sexual practises obviously work on natural men, that is, the uncircumcised men

-so the best thing you can do is to relax, think of what sex is really about, let yourself go, and forget all the cultural indoctrination you underwent

-if you can relax, and get in touch with sex and your natural erotic instincts, then everything should go smoothly.

On uncircumcised men, there is no need to use petroleum-based industrial lubricants. The foreskin acts as a natural lubricant.

So for the first time you can get a wet pussy and enjoy sex, spontaneously, whereas with a cut man, you need lots of lube.


Hope this answers some of your questions. The key is to act normal and natural, and not think of how to handle a penis. After all, sex is a very natural act, which works best with natural genitals.

 

Something I needed to add.

You should also take into account that uncircumcised men have an intact penis, which includes the thousands of nerve endings located right beneath the head and attached to the foreskin.

So if you roll back the foreskin, you find a very sensitive area that stretches several centimeters down on the shaft.

This area is destroyed during circumcision; the scarring process and the hardening of the skin, make it unsensitive, a dead zone.

So keep in mind that an uncircumcised man had a much larger erogenic zone. It stretches from the head right down the shaft, to the second erogenic zone, which is located at the base of the shaft.

 

The health issues of circumcision are moot in a society that has condoms and good health care. See http://www.mensq.com/menshealth/mensq-a4678.html. What is not addressed is the child's right to choose what happens to their own body. You have a right to any opinion you want regarding circumcision but that right does not extend to cutting of a very important and sensitive part of the human body just because of an 'age old tradition'. I thought the goal of the new age is to improve upon the past. And in this situation I would like to improve on the rights of male childern and note that 'age old' solutions really don't apply in this modern world. In addition, the removal of the forskin removes the production of smegma. See http://www.cirp.org/library/normal/wright1/ to learn more about this. Interesting that we can look at cultures that perform clitorectomies, but never consider that circumcision likewise is a disfigurement to the human body. When we consider our personal battle for spiritual and sexual freedom, would we really want to push our personal beliefs on our children?

 

While I agree with the rest of you post whole heartedly, I would disagree slightly on this one point - although, on the whole, what you say is correct.

Not all women are physically capable of generating sufficient lubricant for a comfortable penetration, particularly where girth is overly generous. This can either be a simple matter of a genetic thing, where the woman has never produced much in the way of natural lubricants, or it can be down to age, as it is quite a common condition for women to 'dry up' slightly once they pass the menopause, especially if they aren't in the habit of having regular sex to maintain the flow. In such circumstances then a water based lubricant, such as KY Jelly, should be used. Petroleum Jelly may be used, but NEVER, EVER, if a condom is also to be used - besides, water based lubricants are far better, seeing as they are specifically designed for the purpose.

For example, one woman I was with was a widow in her 50s who had been without a sexual partner for the previous 15 - 20 years, by which time she had pretty much regained her virginity (where the hymen can reheal), so not only was she tight, but she was also very dry, despite plenty of foreplay. Plus there was the additional problem of my more than ample girth.

She chose to apply plenty of Vaseline, which did help with penetration, but even during sex it still felt greasy, and cleaning the remaining Vaseline off afterwards was a major problem for both of us. If I had know beforehand there was going to be a problem, I would have taken along some KY.

 

Sure, I'm not at all against lube, it can help in many instances. Sometimes the girl's not in the mood or not particularly excited, but willing to make love anyways. Just grab lube.

All I said, though, is that the foreskin acts as a device that both produces natural lubricant, as well as a device that distributes the girls' lubricant very finely all over the vagina.

And so in most circumstances, uncircumcised couples will not need additional lube. Circumcised people often do.

 

Check out my post on "New Information About Circumcision" which cites a very recent study of a large number of sexually experienced African men who were then circumcised and questioned aobut their sexual enjoyment before and after circumcision. 98+% of them had very good sexual enjoyment cut and uncut. So their penises after they were cut had not become an"insensitive, dead zone", as the schlonger puts it. He throws out insults, not facts.

 

Hmmm, Wills and Harry were cut after Diana's death? Do you know how old they were?
And so what if the NHS didn't cover circumcision, doesn;t mean that it was the nirm before that anyway.
I was told not to pay attention to you in an earlier post... I can now see why!