Russell Eisenman, "Penis Size: Width May Be More Important Than Length for Female Satisfaction", University of Texas-Pan American, USA http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/backmatter/1472-6874-1-1-b1.pdf Girls, would you agree: is penis width more important than length? P.S.: I'm just asking to help some smaller members in here, who might have some width, but not that much length. Of course, nothing of this applies to me, since I have a hunormous thick fat long dong.
lol Reminds me of Deuce Bigalo....lol....skinny penis. I think having a fair width penis but above average length is better than having a 4 inch tree stump no?
WHAT? JOHN SCHLONG DOESN'T HAVE STATISTICS ON THIS VERY IMPORTANT QUESTION? SURELY HE CAN CREATE SOME.
50 girls doesnt seem like a very big sample size to be assuming something about all women.. [[sorry guys I am taking statistics]] I chose width but there are limits to even that.. Too wide hurts..
Don't you think it would be a bit idiotic to create a stat of a research result that is as clearcut as this one? But maybe you're a bit of a dummy and need a graphical representation of what - 45 "yes" versus 5 "no" on 50 subjects - looks like.
Width definitely does matter more. I don't think a guy can get more than 5 inches inside me without painfully pounding against my cervix, so it doesn't even matter that much.
Too wide a penis can create chafing on the vaginal opening if there is not adequate lubrication. A penis of average girth (5 inches) can satisfy any woman. The study done seems random - the two "popular football players" who conducted the survey called 50 women they knew (and probably had sex with many of them) and asked them how much penile width meant to them. Did these two guys precondition the result, based on the size and girth of their own equipment? What is a female to say if she has had sex with one of these guy's 5" long, 6"girth penis? That she liked length better? I doubt it.
Eh, anything too long or too wide hurts. I think the 'satisfaction' comes from the motion, not the size.. i mean, seriously, we get off on our FINGERS. although, and smaller than that and you may have a bit of a problem.
Shouldn't both me important, i mean they are both factors in the pleasure department right. Like i think there is a fine like in between the to. Just a thought tho, but im a dude so idk.
Width is better for straight sex, but length is better when it comes to anal. As a Bi I can speak from experience from both sides. I consider myself as being reasonably well endowed (average length, 6½", but generous girth, 7"). When participating in straight sex, I've found this to be very pleasing to the women, as it fills them more, with additional stimulation to the inner walls of the vagina. However, when it comes to anal sex (with a man or a woman), the additional girth can make it extremely difficult, in fact sometime totally impossible to achieve penetration. From the receiving side of things, I much prefer my pertner's penis to be long & thin, as the initial penetration is far easier & less painful, and gets to stimulate the prostate more effectively. Horses for courses I guess.
This thread was asking women what they think. Men like you need long penises that can tickle the prostate gland. But women don't have a prostate, so this topic is irrelevant to this discussion.