i heard Einstein did believe in god and tried to prove it with physics but his calculations always showed that there is no god, things where to random to be ordered from a higher being.
if they were not ordered. 'to random' and were 'to random' to be ordered.. what are we...? A python sketch? occam
ive seen limitless info that disproves god its just that believers wont accept the truth into their brainwashed minds. Google god is imaginary-50 simple proofs. These are just some of the conclusions you come to when you think about the subject rationally.
Suny Yes god as described by religion. Google does a job on them as i could. Design...? [is not god, and never claimed to be] Its not about 'god'.Which is a childish subset of the concept of 'design'. The concept of design applied to our observable universe cannot be invalidated. soz occam
Not sure if this is the article mentioned, but it's pretty good nonetheless: http://www.slate.com/id/2193557/pagenum/all/#page_start I do feel like we need an official distinction to be made between the god that might exist because of our inability to absolutely prove anything, and the god or gods specific to particular religions. It's so frustrating when people take a tiny little whole in science and make like their god fits right into it. Science can't disprove the existence of god, but this in itself is no proof that any specific notion of god is true, or that anything in the Bible or the Koran or the Torah or whatever happened. It often seems like an attempt to sidestep the tedious process of actually offering proof that something happened, by simply proving that it might have. I never really understand why science is expected to work so hard for religions that just whine about its results half the time anyway.