The Dennis Kucinich attempt at bringing articles of impeachment at President Bush was thwarted by members of his own party this past week and they even ridiculed him for bringing it up due to lack of evidence. Sorry and thanks for your call to support the troops. http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/06/11/kucinich.impeach.vote/ http://blog.cleveland.com/openers/2008/06/kucinichs_drive_to_impeach_bus.html
No offence, but, if you're going to moan about somebody 'cherry-picking'. Is it wise to 'cherry-pick' yourself? I'm sorry to break it to you, I do think his articles have 'the whole story'. The votes, the lack of support, and it being kicked into the long grass are irrefutable. Higherthanhell, why are you giving this guy your time?
you are aware obama wants to move the troops back into afghanistan to continue "the war on terror"? on top of that he wants to add another 100,000 troops to our military and he has no intention of withdrawing all our troops from iraq?? so why if i supported my troops would i want to vote for obama?? really makes no sense to me.. mccain they keep dying in iraq along with innocent iraqi civilians,,obama they die in afghanistan along with innocent afghan civilians.. whats the difference? there is none in my book...
its all a losing cause.. "al qeada",,(if we are playing fantasy) is now based in pakistan and everyone knows it.. http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0611/p99s01-duts.html so when obama attacks pakistan going after "terrorists"(he already said he would not hesitate) thats better than what we have in iraq?? i just dont see your logic..
Fair enough; but, that is how it appears to me. That's because the articles were not about that. I was talking about the whole story of it being kicked into the long grass. Not, everything Bush has been doing in the last few weeks or every crime and misdemeanour Bush has ever done (We could be here all year).
I read it as, "Al Qaeda-linked militants" . Not ""al qeada" is now based in pakistan". Every Tom Dick and Sally seem to be "Al Qaeda-linked" , hence the notion they are bigger than they probably are.
here is this clear enough for you odon?? http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jX3kgnlhAWk40apkx635jjD3jmHQ
"North Waziristan has been singled out by US officials as the international headquarters for Osama bin Laden's resurgent Al-Qaeda network, allied with local pro-Taliban militants." Yes perfectly clear . I was not attempting to say you were wrong, just, that is not what was in the original link. You learn something new everyday.
Maybe if you say that often enough people will believe it like they did the claims of WMD, Iraq's involvement with Al Qaeda, Iraq playing a role in the bombing of America, and the new lies they are trying to spread about Iran while providing enriched uranium to the Saudis, the ones that actually piloted the planes and are now holding the American consumer hostage with oil price manipulation. http://www.publicintegrity.org/WarCard/
