Israel, Bush, Cheney and Kriston and the NeoCon's prepared to bomb Iraq.

The decision is easy.

Talk to those that profess your sanctity when they you like

Talk to me when you are but mortal.

 

Odon.. but i am mortal my friend.. your problem is that you dont believe i can be.
both
Sanctity is a religious term.. lets not wander into that garden.
You think i speak too....what..



its you who Does not

 

Wow, You actually think the US would even consider using "tanks" lmao, come on.

For someone claiming to be "in the know" militarily, you sure fubared this.

Did your milsim software tell you a tank brigade was your best option?

uh, the title of the thread may have gave you a clue.

As for the rest of your comments, i don't have a clue what you are talking about.

you did me, i'm roflmfao

 

Ah

your one of them....
that think wars are fought with bombs..
like those who thought they could win in vietnam with linebacker2
sorry 'my friend'
look at iraq.. both times huge air assaults.. but men/TANKS took the ground
The 100 hour war DID NOT include the air assault..why not?
because no air assault wins wars. This is a given.
Wars ALWAYS require men/women on the ground.
show me ONE WAR. ever won without men on the ground.
you cannot.
from troy to [maybe..]tehran
without men [or tanks] on the ground.. nothing is won
the only time this truism has not held.. is hiroshima/nagasaki
and that was shear wearyness and shock value. [and no more cv's doh]
are you saying the US would do that? [nuke em into the stone age]

and you have the shear gall to 'attempt to insult' me and suggest at the same time a war can be won from the air..lol
not once did i try to insult.. yet you do..

ROTFL

occam

 

look whats been happening while i was farting from mouth

Don't bomb Iran, Bush warns Israel
[SIZE=-1]New York Daily News - 46 minutes ago[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]BY RICHARD SISK WASHINGTON - President Bush and the top US military commander warned Israel Wednesday against bombing Iran, suggesting the US doesn't want to get involved in a third war.

IF it happens.. watch how quick the iranian airforce gets blown into the weeds
30 minutes?
the 'day after' will hold new meaning.
Most likely tho, it will be osirak repeated . IF

occam
[/SIZE]

 

4 israeli f15e eagles will cut down border of jordan/syria.. then straight across iraq. same as operation opera but longer range, easy with f15 body paks
b4 the US can do anything.. israel will lay 6 to 12 LGB;s on reactor...
asta la vista 'baby'.
thats how you do it.. u dont Fuk about talking.
Israel has always been the master of this// look at 67 and the destruction of the egytian airforce before it had a plane in the air.

 

.

 

if iran is attacked you can be sure that they will fire everything and i mean everything as return fire because they know that there is no negotiation. whether the population of iran is wiped out by atomic weaponary or by a slow blood letting that kills millions every year there would be no difference.

from the iranian perspective by launching everything at once they would have more chance of hitting the target.

in this game the first strike is the winning move, if you allow the otherside to weaken you with sanctions and embargoes then you have already lost.

a first strike move even against a stronger opponent with sufficient force that is ongoing would cause a domino effect.

if the us strikes first the minorities of the country might be persuaded to fight against iran , irans allies would evaporate and roll over.

if iran strikes first then iraq really would be lost and you could throw in afghanistan too. then the price of oil would skyrocket. iran would probably attack saudi too probably their refineries, kuwait would be lost too. yes you could then launch a counter attack by that time but you would find it very difficult to launch an attack without oil.

the key to winning the next and final chapter to the iraq war is the first strike, whoever strikes now first will win.

 

“Israel has always been the master of this// look at 67 and the destruction of the egytian airforce before it had a plane in the air”

Oh yes the six day war that brought about the occupation that has sapped the Israelis’ ethical, moral, and political authority, a festering sore that’s led to many of the problems in that region today.

**
“Yet even before the fighting ended, as Israel completed its capture of Jerusalem and the West Bank, President Lyndon Baines Johnson, one of the staunchest friends Israel has ever had in the White House, warned that by the time the Americans had finished with all the "festering problems", they were going to "wish the war had never happened".
Four days after the war ended, US Secretary of State Dean Rusk warned that if Israel held on to the West Bank, Palestinians would spend the rest of the century trying to get it back.
Forty years on, Israel has settled around 450,000 people on land occupied in 1967, in defiance of everyone's interpretation of international law except its own.
The settlers are protected by all the resources of the state, including the IDF, from a rebellious subject people, many of whom believe that ruthless violence targeted at civilians as well as soldiers is a legitimate response to occupation.
For Palestinians, the settlements are a catastrophe, made worse every day by the fact that they are expanding fast.
After 40 years as an occupier, Israel can no longer count on the international support it had in 1967.
The settlers see their presence as a national asset, necessity and obligation, but many other Israelis, to varying degrees, believe the settlements, and all the other legacies of 1967 that have deepened the conflict with the Palestinians, are a national disaster.”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6709173.stm
**
Try listening to the broadcasts “Six Days that Changed the Middle East” at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/documentary_archive/6676265.stm
**