My boyfriend says hell do anything thats legal with me, so like im really interested in these things. I just feel like theyre bullcrap, and they are arent they? at herbalhighs.com all bull?
They're all pretty much garbage. Except for salvia, which is alright. Get an extract and bong it . . .
don't just buy salvia and smoke it without knowing anything about it. you can't have any idea what it's like unless you do it, so i'm not even going to say "unless you want to risk having the most horrifying experience of your life". most of the stuff at iamshaman.com is pretty true to it's description, just as a rule steer clear of anything claiming to mimic the effects of anything illegal. just because something's legal doesn't mean it's not worth your time, but it has to be taken for what it is. good luck
Plus, Salvia Divinorum is illegal in the USA now, or pretty close to now... For some nice things to try, get some kava kava, kratom, blue lotus/lily and an organic (but potent) herbal blend. These aren't good substitutes for marijuana, they are just a very plesant treat. I think he will really enjoy a Kava Kava drink the most... Check out IAmShaman.com , they have medium prices, but they work with the highest quality goods. Good luck!
dude, only a couple of states have made it illegal. But if you look at some of the containts, stuff with skullcaps and LSA are usually good.
Go for kratom. In my opinion its replacing slavia because its becoming illegal. Its nice to except for the fact it taste like shit.
Banning salvia divinorum = suicide | seriously ban all the good stuff. Why not ban smoking/alcohol, jeeze herbal shit getting banned more and more everyday cause of some prick kids.
Not cause of some prick kids even - cause of some prick oppressive government that finds it unacceptable to alter one's conciousness and therefore makes it against the law to "protect people", what a load of bullshit
I've tried MANY legal things, and have got the best results with salvia (short trip), kava(relaxation, works on same receptors in brain as alcohol), kratom(opiate like), and blue lotus(empathogenic/euphoric). I've heard very good things about the spice, spice diamond, and spice gold herbal blends. dxm and nitrous oxide are also legal. San pedro/peruvian torch cacti, morning glory/hawaiian baby woodrose seeds, and poppy pods can be acquired legally (consumption of the mescaline, LSA, or opiates within is illegal, though). amanita muscaria and pantherina are legal, and can be eaten or smoked. wild dagga also wasn't bad if you're just looking for a buzz.
In Arizona you can get it(salvia) at %90 of headshops/smokeshops....and we're a ZERO TOLERANCE state for drugs. a seed or stem on the floorboard of you car constitutes posession...even a chunk of resin.
Until you have lived the psychedelic joy of Head Fuel Range's ''Purple Ohms'', and similar legal highs, I except the skepticism!
I hate that it is considered schedule I. This means that it has a high potential for abuse, a high potential for addiction, no medical uses, and a lack of saftey associated with the drug. BULLSHIT! I hate to see s divinorum scooped up into this group which is largely subjective anyway. It's hard to believe that another naturally occurring substance is now being banned in the US. I blame it on the fucking youtube idiots. It's a damn shame...
I myself find that about 200 rivea seeds ground up really fine and then put in cold water for an hr and drank is nice. no naseau... good visuals...great body buzz Lasted about 6 hours for me, took 2 hours for the peak to start, then peaked for about an hr then slowed... I didnt feel bad afterwards at all.. felt very good
its lower than bullshit its simply false. The legal system doesn't typically pay attention to the right hand side of the equation. CI = high potential for abuse, a high potential for addiction, no medical uses, and a lack of saftey associated with the drug. There is no current medical use, but abuse and addiction potenctial is low. Kappa agonists are not addictive! It may be written that it is outlawed but it clearly does not fit the definition of a CI substance, therefore what is written in the law books is not valid. In fact it is clear that there are several substances written to be contained in CI, yet in fact do not meet the definition. Cannabis for instance not only has not not been proven to meet the requirements for CI but has been proven to not meet the requirements.