U.S. Presidential Election. Who would you choose?

If you could vote in the U.S. presidential election who would you choose and why?

 

Has to be Kerry just to get rid of that moron...Not an ideal candidate but soooooooo much better than old twatface

 

Yes ... don't take the risk of giving the neo-cons a second term. Vote for the person most likely to oust Bush... he needs to go as a matter of public hygiene...

 

Mike's with Kerry all the way AND I'm with Mike all the way... looks like I pick Kerry then

 

I guess no one likes Bush then?

 

I can't say i'm surprised

Hopefully he'll make an even bigger ass of himself tonight, than at the last debate.

 

Not saying Kerry is the answer, just anyone but Bush and Mr Burns...

Bu__ Sh__!!!

 

HE will be! He can see the future and it ain't him!

 

well i would rather see little jimmy walton i charge of america. hes got a better collection of toy soldiers than bush... but since he aint running then i guess im for kerry...


VOTE JIMMY WALTON!!!!!

 

I GUESS I AM A BUSH MAN..seeing kerry as president makes me more ill than thinking about Mr Howard run our country. its not a deep investigation of anyones policys or anything and i am sure its prety fick of me to not to look into their policys...but Mr blair and mr Bush just strike me as getting the job done.. i don't live under mr bushs 'regime' so can't say in all honesty if he is good or bad , but just from what i have heard i agree with his rationale in a lot of things (generaly iraq) but his other policys well i just get them filtered through other peoples opinions (generaly not good)...but i am a selfish so if he aint hurtin me he aint so bad.

 

ummm are you sure you agree with his policy on iraq... you agree with going to war against a country for your own personal gain.. and using your own working class as cannonfodder so bush and all his fat cat friends can get richer, while destroying iraq's hope of a secure econimic structure by taking their oil which is the only thing the iraqi's actually have thats worth anything.
you agree with the complete unecessary bombing of a country that was no more a threat to world peace than korea or kasakstahn(dunno if thats spelt right) under the false pretense of WMD? admittedly saddam was a bit of a wanker.. but he had passified himself in recent years and under his reign at least the iraqi people had work and had some sort of life. rather than being affraid to leave the house due to the fear of being gunned down by a bunch of gun-totin-shoot-anyhing-that-moves bunch of american redneck killing machines. or blown up by a rebble force trying to take back THEIR country from a bunch of imperialist spunkbubbles.

so i hope your joking beacuse the whole iraqi war is a farce. just an excuse for money... the whole bush government is a farce, and how an itelligent bloke like blair got suckered into it is beyond me.. but he did and that makes him a bit of a tosser too in my book.

sorry.. bit of a rant there... but no mate.. you gotta be kidding

 

well thats a conspiracy i don't believe in... i don't also find counting bodies as a unjustification for this war either... i have read many inteligent people around here and other places start reasonable debates about why bush is bad..they all resort in the end too this kinda stuff.. if i ever found it to be true , i would change my mind. I am always willing to change my mind if its proven that these things are true...but so far i have not.. i just see the good that is being done...i am a positive kinda guy

 

Just out of curiosity, why do you frequent a hippy forum if you have politics that endorse a right-wing born-again christian conservative? Just wondering.

 

..i frequent a hippy forum because i like it ... you gotta problem with that

Are you saying that the conspiracys are true ????

 

I'm just curious. A community of predominantly left-wing ultra-liberal people seems an odd choice of hang-out for someone with very conservative politics. I mean, you're bound to end up in conflict with people, so I just would've thought you'd prefer a community where your views were less.... ummm.. disruptive? Like I said, just curious.

 

I tend to hang out in predominantly left wing ultra liberal kinda places .. such as http://www.loony-show.com/cms.php/index.html ...not realy thought about it. surely you lot need a bit of disruption ..nothing wrong with that. As i say when i see that the allegations pointed toward bush are proven to be true...i will happily accept it. I maybe avoiding seeing the truth ... but i don't think so.. I just think that its because people are ultra liberal and left wing that they wish for these things to be true , to make them seem like they are right and that its not in anyones elses humanity to do anything good..

 

I don't think i am rude or offensive..can i stay ???

 

*shrug* Hang where you like. Just curious what makes you tick. However.... this statement.....

... is rude and offensive, and a good example of why your views will always be provocative on these boards (which was why I was wondering why you hang here....). Just because you disagree with someone, it doesn't mean that their views aren't just as rational as your own. Indeed, whether or not you agree with it, a very powerful intellectual case has been made for opposing the war in Iraq. Dismissing this as "wishful thinking" is.... well, rude and offensive.

 

No the people that start threads and rant on about stuff that has been proven to be false .. people that use flawed arguements and the death of innocents to prop up their point of view , thats offensive.. I disagree with people that don't provide proof in what they say .avoiding the truth is what some people do..not all thats not fair but lots do. I am not dismissing anything , just that i have never seen any proof to back up these things...just merely a carefuly re-interpretation of given events. a bit of a contradiction i suppose , but i am not articulate enough to always make sense so sue me

I just read stuff like this http://healingiraq.blogspot.com/ and see that a lot of people accept this war as a postive step thats all. i don't like seeing death and destruction ...but i just think people that attack bush/blair are doing so because they don't like war in general ...thats a point of view i can understand ... so why not just say so?? instead of attacking something that you would be apposed to anyway..

give me a good ati-war site that will make me less cynical ??

 

just wandering dude, if you've seen farenhiet 9/11 yet... yes i agree that michael moore is making a point and so will present it all in a well thought out spin.. but facts are facts, if it wasn't true.. he simply wouldn't get away with saying it... if you haven't seen it.. then watch it.. if you have seen it.. then i can't believe that your brushing it off as lefty propoganda, and saying that the war was a good thing.