I have a 80 MG Oxycotin....

of course there is.

 

bleh.. coke is so shitty.. i fuckin hate coke.. and any upper for that matter.. gimme opiates!

 

coke sucks , one of the worst drugs on the market, that and meth\. But hey theres nothing wrong with doing drugs, they fun, they can give you some of the best feelings in the world from them too. They are completely safe if you know what your doing ( know your mind, body, tolerance), and if you moderate your uses to 2-3 times a year. If all people could do that, theyd probably enjoy life more.

 

The perfect drug plan... It doesnt ussually work out though lol

 

Fuck uppers.
If I need energy, I'll quit smoking weed for a few days.

 

Uppers are the shit, fuck downers, they don't make you a productive member of society

 

^ lol

 

mmmm both.

 

example plz?

 

should i wear a condom when i fuck 12yo girls?..

 

My Avatar is my dog. 'Asking how high she can fly' is a wrong question. It shows that the questioner doesn't understand-

1-That she is a dog (maybe the questioner think that she is a bird)
2-That maybe dogs CAN fly
3-Or what the definition of 'fly' is (maybe the questions thinks that fly means jump)

So the question is wrong. It is a question-but it makes no sense. Any answer is wrong (so the question is wrong) except "dogs can't fly" which would then lead to more questions which eventually would lead to a new question which would be different than the original question.

So the original question is wrong.

This makes a lot of sense if your high when you think about it (or write it).

KevinH

 

well if i really believed that your dog could fly, then it's a legitimate question isn't it

 

He might believe it-and that belief is wrong-which makes the question wrong. His beliefs are wrong. So the question is wrong.

Just as an answer can be wrong-so can a question.

 

They are both completely circumstantial....a question is dependant upon the current state of whatever is involved in it's inquisition, while an answer is entirely dependant on the imposed question and the state of whatever it implies being "true" (real, most probable, likely..whatever you want to call it).

So, asking "How high can you're dog fly?" is implying one doesn't even know if dogs can fly in the first place or simply assumes that they can, which doesn't make the question "wrong". It simply means the individual who initiated the question doesn't know something, which will soon become known to them in the answering of the question. Not necessarily an answer they were expecting, but an answer nonetheless...

(If someone asks the question knowing that dogs can't fly, then that's just stupidity, not wrongfulness...)

This is basically how much of scientific theory comes about...we ask questions, often based off current/past assumptions and can get answers we never expected, due to the realization that we had something "wrong" the whole time we went about asking the original question. I don't think it's that the question is "wrong"...just that there's wrong assumptions contained within it. Who knows though, that's completely up to ones personal interpretation...there's no right or wrong here just an interesting conversation about the state of a question.

So one can be wrong in their assumptions, but not in their questioning....right?.

(PS...I'm just having fun with this....it really doesn't matter if a question is indeed "right" or "wrong" to me.)

Oxy is a wrong answer to most anything though....

 

The correct question should be "Can your dog fly?" The question "How high can your dog fly" is based on a wrong belief or assumption. The question does not lead to an answer it leads to discussion and explanation. The is no answer so the question is wrong.

A question leads to an answer. If there is no answer then the question is wrong.

Again-in my original Reply I stated that smoking was import to understanding this.

KevinH

 

"How high can your dog fly?"
"My dog cannot fly at all."

 

your avatar is very misleading.. seeing as all i see is the dogs head.. i can't see the rest of the body.. therefor i dunno if its a dog.. or a dog with wings

 

Seeing as the epic debate that took place in this thread on the right way to do an OC80 followed by epic dog debates, this thread can only be labeled as:

EPIC!

 

Some of you may need a vaporizor to follow this-

Everything important in life can be found in The Star Trek series-usually I turn to The Next Generation to answer life's important questions-but this time to the original-with Captain James T Kirk.

In the episode-The Changeling-The Enterprise encounters Nomad-a space probe-whose mistaken mission is to sterilize imperfect biological units, which seems to refer to all imperfect life forms. Fortunately it calls Captain Kirk the Creator, referring to Nomad's creator Roy Kirk, and obeys him. Kirk finally gets Nomad to destory itself by pointing out that Nomad is wrong-imperfect. It's assumption is wrong that Captain Kirk is it's creator-Nomad mistakes Captain Kirk for Roy Kirk.

(you may need to hit the vaporizor again).

Nomad's basic belief in his creator is wrong. So nomad is wrong. The "given" facts that nomad believes are wrong. My dog cannot fly. So any questions relating to my dog flying are wrong.

(I may need to hit the vaporizor again at this point)

My dog cannot fly. The question is wrong. For a question to be a question it needs to have an answer. There is no answer to how high can my dog fly. Saying that my dog cannot fly is not an answer-it leads to further discussion-discussion that would eventually lead to the question never being asked again-it doesn't need to be asked again because it is wrong.

KevinH

If this doesn't make sense then you haven't been hitting your vaporizor.

 

Here is the scene from Star Trek in Italian-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRaFd_s_zh4