Dark matter does not exist

Can we develop a new theory of gravity that can successfully explain the extensive observational data through gravity alone? We await the results from the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.

 

Cern Will Fail!

 

u'll wait long...
it keeps getting broken

and i believe dark matter exists, not because of theory but because it's almost proven that it does

 

define existence

 

An experiment can not as such fail. It can confirm of refute a hypothesis. To take philosophy of science to extremes we can say it can only refute a hypothesis or not, though in practise this is not really a useful statement. Applying this to CERN it can only say whether of not certain particles exist. Scientifically either result is a success.

 

everything, nothing, and everything and nothing in between (repeated)

 

neither does LSD..

 

how about this; gravity is energy resulting from polarity shifts when molecules rearrange

 

Think dark matter exist between my ears lol. The most stabble substance is iron and in theory everything should over time breakdown to iron but it does.nt so there must be another force at work ie dark matter.

 

Agree to disagree

 

How is iron the most stable substance? When it is exposed to air and water, it turns to iron oxide i.e. rust. Given enough time, oxygen, and water, any thing made of iron will eventually turn completly to rust and disintegrate.

 

Reading this forum has resulted in my colon relaxing enough to dump rather a large cluster of dark matter

 

i kinda thought dark matter seemed like bullshit too when i heard about it. "everything is this and that except for this percentage which we shall call dark matter" but im a noob so wtf do i know right?

 

Now that you mention dark matter does the square root of -1 exist? What is real and what isn't? Are we living reality or imagination? Scary shit if you ruminate on this longer...

 

Iron - 56 has the greatest nuclear binding energy of all the elements (Ie: more energy is required to seperate Fe 56 into its individual nucleons it's nucleus is composed of - than the rest of the elements). Therefore Fe 56 is the most stable element in nuclear reactions. What you're referring to is iron's ability to lose or gain electrons. Fe's willingness to be oxidised or reduced (ie: chemical reactions) is unrelated to its willingness to participate in "nuclear reactions." Therefore the person you quoted is right.

 

Thanks epoch. Even though iron will rust its still iron oxide hence its not lost its iron or been broken down into other elements. So yeah its a stabble element. Cant remember the others but there's only a handful of truely stabble elements.

 

saying dark matter does not exist is like saying there are no threads to hold this universe together, minus weak,strong nuclear bonds, its a strong scientific theory that dark matter exists

 

.

 

i think you are mistaking gravitational fluxes with dark matter.