John Kerry just said Global Warming is a threat to National Security.

5 months ago HHB had no clue as to how many World Hertiage sites were even in the USA, now he's an expert on the subject.

It was a non-issue then same as it is now.......


http://www.hipforums.com/newforums/showthread.php?t=323217


yeah i understand how it works "they" have control over these sites. "we" no longer do.. Really?

I'm still waiting for an answer to this claim
Name "1" site.

 

I see we could lose some National Sovereignty in some of our public parks with this deal.

But the disappearance of private land ownership?

 

No, not even close........

No,

 

I really don’t see it as a threat to the U.S. Sovereignty maybe in a strange interpertaion it could..?

I am just trying to see how such a huge conspiracy speculation ties into this global eco park reserve.
I mean the entire country of the U.S.A. could be teetering on the edge of a monstrous cliff disguised as an innocent eco park reserve club.

 

your point??

when did i say that? i will say i am much more informed about it now than i was then thanks to that news article bringing my attention to all this..

i answered it in the other thread..

while it is a back door way of having control over whats done at the sites its control nonetheless.

 

i never claimed complete abolishment of landownership,that was rat..

however if you read further on the page you took quotes from you saw,

and as you see the biospheres have the same agenda written into them.

once again,i never said "all pivate land would be abolished",nor did i say this agenda would be fulfilled in our lifetimes. however the agenda is there and it is incrementally being implemented.

you dont see it as a serious threat,then there is really not much i can do except to agree to disagree.
however this isnt a "conspiracy theory" its fact.

now this has been off topic long enough and i dont wanna have ari scold me or worse so im pretty much done here..

if either of you would like to start a new thread on this or continue in the thread cad brought up i suppose that would be fine but once again,this is off topic and ari seems to frown on breaking the guidelines so im done..

 

Actually the studying covers a span of about half a million years. Core samples dude.

 

I became skeptical of the whole issue after reading this:

http://www.grist.org/news/maindish/2006/05/09/roberts/

(Bolding added for emphasis and clarification.) What exactly was or is his solution to the problem? Carbon offset trading, from which he's positioned to make a huge profit?

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54528