Dude, what the hell are you talking about? Did i say anything about babies not needing their mother after their born anywhere in my statement? -NO... that is not even anywhere close to what i was talking about. read it again
Not being a woman ..i can't totaly answer. but if i got someone pregnant (i would ask first of course)..i would discuss before hand their opinion. Me personaly i don't have a problem with it. but i am talking with out having the experiance of having a possible child of mine taken away. I think i would rather adopt ....
I guess you would dig up peoples relatives as well ?? like those nice people that care about animals..flame you ... i would not bother. i realy hope your joking .
against it...mostly.... the only times I think abortion should be allowed is the case of rape. or if the mothers own life is at risk. or Perhaps if there is something majorly screwed up with the fetus. thier is only one porpose for sex, and thats to reproduce. and humans are disined to enjoy the act. so in my mind if you can do the deed you can raise the child. if a person truly cant care for their child, then they should give it up for adoption.
wtf? so a 10 year old girl could raise a baby? i think there's more than one purpose. babies are just a bad side effect. sex is for fun, enjoyment, stress-relief, bonding, etc. I think every girl should be on birth control though. $40 every 3 months isnt bad at all. Consider it baby insurrance.
no she could give it up for adoption,or did you mis that part. most 10 year olds are not fertile anyways. sex just dosnt seem that important, its just a body fuction lke breething or doing a number 2. and its a compleatly unesesary one, I dont even solo dance. a lot of the people on this web site seem like retarded sex lunatics to me.
....And you, mam, is what makes up this overpopulated, underprivelaged, leeching society we live in today!
i don't believe in abortions just becaus a child desirves their right to life if given the opportunity, its not fair for a parent of person to take it away.
i think there should be abortion, but it definitely should be regulated. there's a certain time when the egg develops enough for it to become a baby, and after that it should not be killed. but before then, it isn't even living so it's not even killing anything...
reguardless of whether you're pro-choice or anti-choice, there's a study you might find to be pretty interesting: people consider a woman's sexual behavior in making judgements about the appropriateness of abortion. people are more likely to support a woman having an abortion if she used birth control and had a steady partner. who would you be more inclined to support having an abortion? a) anne has had a steady boyfriend for the past three years, and they are in love. the two of them go on a camping trip one weekend, and in her excitement, anne forgets to take one of her pills. anne discovers she is pregnant. b) sue does not have a steady boyfriend. over the past month alone, she has had three sexual partners. she usually relies on condoms. sue discovers that she is pregnant and does not know who the father is. most people would support anne having an abortion, rather than sue. it's almost like supporting anne as a "reward" for her behavior, and being forced to maintain the pregnancy is a "punishment" for sue. this is pretty scary, because people are not looking at the overall picture. despite her apparent irresponsibility for not using effective birth control, and the fact that she does not know who the father is, sue is considered the best candidate for motherhood. claiming that, "sue had it coming" should not mean that she will be a fit mother. anne, who displays responsibility, and would have help raising the child, is usually supported for having an abortion.
in reguards to the actual topic: i'm completely pro-choice. abortions are going to happen reguardless of their legality.. and i'd rather them occur legally. if someone chooses to have an abortion, it's in her best interest to have it done in a safe, clean environment, where she has access to the proper treatment and any necessary aftercare.
I'd say they can both have an abortion. Sue would probably be unfit to even carry a child, and the child would probably have diseases if she didn't end her pregnancy. I think Sue should definitely not have the child, and I think if Anne wants to have an abortion then that is fine too.