Like breeding, baby-making sex. I'm curious if intelligence like that is considered attractive as far as reproduction. Or would you rather propagate with a strong physically attractive, but dumb guy.
first off, im not into corpses secondly, i go for personality before looks.... personalitys usually tied to intelligence (ie dumb people arent terribly attractive to me) but you can have very cruel, very intelligent people as well.
If Albert Einstein were still alive, then yes. Just so (firstly) I can say 'I did Albert Einstein' and also because maybe he would transfer some intelligence over But to answer your question, I don't think I could go out with someone who isn't very smart. I'd have to be able to have a proper conversation with them :-/.
In terms of breeding, baby-making, gene-selecting sex then Albert wins hands down. As far as evolution goes, it is human intelligence that has led us to become the dominant species that we are today, not buff pectorals. The fact that human woman have such difficult pregnacies and births (compared to other higher mammals) is that nature has deemed this a price worth paying in order for infants to be born with such HUGE craniums (and bigger, more convoluted brains). Along the same lines, but not quite.... I was having a conversation with a male friend of mine recently about men with big dicks (as ya do). He proceeded to tell me (after he'd done with the 'is mine big enough?', 'don't women want more?' shit), that every man that possessed an enormous willy that he'd encountered thus far in his life (he's 52) had also, strangely, been utterly dumb as fuck. And I mean dumb. Real, moronic, lights-are-on-but-no-ones-home, thick as pigshit dumb. 'Why is that?', he asked. I shrugged. I honestly didn't know. But it got me thinking... In terms of human evolution and genetics (which I've studied at post-grad level for several years now), why would such a pattern exist (if at all)? Now, (brace yourselves boys, this may be controvercial), maybe, back in the days when hominids were first emerging from the trees, a big wang was needed if you didn't have the charisma/charm/tool-making/providing skills/cunning/smooth-talking (grunting?) abilities to attract a mate. If that was the case, then maybe a big willy was natures way of making you appealing when all else failed. (Please note, this is a half-baked theory based on a straw-poll of willy samples, as regaled by the rambling of a drunken middle-aged man. No offence to big-willied men intended )
Please also note that it doesn't naturally follow that men with small dicks have more brains, or that intelligent men are lacking penis punch. If that were the case, then Albert Einstein would have possessed all the trouser prowess of a a small garden shrew -and I would be forced to seriously reconsider my vote in this poll.
"hahaha albert einstein is dead, let's make a joke about fucking the dead" You know what I mean!! IRT urbanhedgemonkey Then shouldn't guys with larger craniums have bigger dicks though? Because in order for the baby to be birthed successfully it needs a larger hole to come out of...
I'd fuck Albie just 'cause of that mustache. Whoa. In all reality, he was probably so intelligent that he was socially retarded, if that makes any sense. I haven't really read much about him, so maybe I'm completely wrong. Most of the kids I know that are obscenely intelligent aren't really too hip with social situations. So I dunno how good his game was, heh. Would I fornicate with him? Probably. Would I make babies with him [or anybody else, for that matter]? Fuck no.
The 'hole' in question is the one in the pelvic girdle as opposed to the vagina, which is soft tissue and stretchy. Large pelvic hole = wide hips (child-bearing hips), not a big vag. As for big craniums... technically human intelligence is down to the degree of brain convolution, not cranial capacity. Neanderthal craniums were actually larger than modern humans but their brains not as convoluted (which accounts for their caveman-ugg reputation). I wonder if they had big willies?
Yeah, I've met a few people with brains the size of small planets that didn't have a clue when it came to social interaction. They were all twitchy and jumpy, stammered, blushed profusely, could talk about nothing but academic shite (or the weather if they were really stuck), and wore sweaters that their kindly mothers had knitted for them. Would I want to fuck any of those? Hell yeah! As long, though, as I had them tied, gagged, bent over a chair, and could play school mistress with my long whippety cane and punish them accordingly. It would be... educational.
I'd fuck old Albie, not biggy, that hair and face, oh yeah. would i fall madly inlove with him and want his kids NO! i've gone the kid route and one's good.
no way. id much rather procreate with someone who was a musical genius than an academic genius. it's way sexier.
I'd fuck a hot dumb guy over an intelligent ugly guy. Sex is not about intelligence or how smart the guy is, it just has to feel good, sheeesh.