When? Numb. Element Of Surprize? No know till moment surprize. Subliminal Impact? In the art and entertainment line up (poster illustrations, trailers-commericals, hypes, star titles, lead star referrences, the settings the inner genres, dvd cover illustrations, whole movie experience, etc). Which Channel (Carry)? Transmission (Distribution) or Reception. Relevant Standing Insight? Non-actuality (Of Temporary Sport) Lead into Back Order Actuality with Fictionality (Of Surrealism Bondage) Lead into Back Order Actuality. Finish Line? Either after full in truth fill in (even before a pointless, non-stop til 'no body stand current placement' climax) or after the effective, precise, 'only touch the which' climax.
Here presence present a leap out (hide) me. But what color a leap, the O.P. sums by 1-6 (or by A-F). Account for a lose in know a next moment before the very moment. The Leap Hide. Hide The Leap. Leap The Hide. Hide Leap The. Extra to the which its to only: And the which with an intentional should try to fail, experience the which own doing (fix) failing the which which can not escape or get a whole release. A should try so to fail your leap release. A leap such with an outcry referrence to just before. What should try (to fail) you due if (since hypothetically) you could get... with me and my crew. Certainly the which back ago have no care if could lead others into Being Hell. The which know they sure will not go in to get others out after. So you see how come you remain in a fix. Hypothetically, the which could get others out, knowing damn well just in thought even with no actuality to willingly be able to back it up since known can't. Yeah, get... just in imagining rather imagining adding futher random torments such a pile on. A get back. Get back own weigh track. Get off still of my back bitch. Pull (Leap-er put outside fictionality), your strap weigh me, and you better kill me! Better off killing who by killing may bring release, but you shall never know, whether or not, such ability can be occur-able. Like Apocalypse in X-men, not known how to kill him or if he can become the result of a kill. But still you should think (or rather should know) along those lines of: and you better kill me! In gist, when finding a can't, you know you stuck. In an X-men episode, Apacalypse said (if recall correct from a stand out line when certain were meaning to end him): You are no further than the ancient babylonians with their sticks and pebbles. So the leaper (currently pastence) realize the hide ^^ concerning the how and the ability to kill me, to actually have a shot in getting an own release. Even if EYE (literally) die my presence present gonna refference a problem. Problem? The, whether or not, any authorship (a seperate make and put different) may or may not still stand own its own even without me (literally no more) which not whole the etc. authorships. Then you have to think, whether or not, EYE turning whole the authorships, you can do it or not, along with knowing not ever the if and when, if ever any point, EYE turn whole the authorships. Do you think the EYE will turn itself into an any single time, permanent killswitch? What are the odds of such? 0 in 0. 0 in infinity. 0 in eternity (think EYE will become what you such a finalization of?). 0 in finity (the sense of even 'as is' in preference though certainly not so a confining finite you are). 0 in enough. 0 in more than enough. 0 in less than enough. 0 in etc. Yeah, even in furthering authorships enough by enough apart a continuation, such also in a finite or finity. A fruitful finite/finity. Besides, keeping even any thing same but just of continual new-ing, shows the finite aspect may go fruitful. Anyway, my and their turn for a leap with no return since the whole beyond in no should try to fail wicked fixaction. The leap sure a point of a mountaintop like how the point with 666 chip brought down to a human grasp though much more than such since such rather grasp you. And Halo kept me in a level stuck, when trying hard to release out the certain level, but that weight a fiction concerning me a boss player, but actual concerning you. Make it far up a mountain just outside the cloud point such a finsh line, only to fail, the point say, and fall right back to the beginning where it all began since current it a last result you are to get use to in the worse wicked wise by a self-sow. The same moment the which no longer leaving hold, the same moment it no longer raining fire (an action to get one) and brimestone by me. Behold, Mabus come during a wickedness. The problem? How likely will he enter his extention to post? Obvious deceptive device hangs when not knowing what expect for if and when the enter press. Get one to not press the enter during a significant leaper moment, with wickedness basing on a liklihood in one pressing to enter? Build with this live (outside fictional) spot! The whole eating and drinking referrence rather implying a freedom of choice (expression) moment. And the "with a shout" by the fictional (carry) just after a no longer raining wickedness. You pull Your strap back for against you then for andfor me. Even so to extra so. And Armageddon, freedom of choice to express, a finish. And the red different, even different than the reference written by me. Rather even a red alert shout closely then reaching me, concerning the just off from the fictionality rather than an always just still on finctionality. Plus, you obviously reveal the get in sickening you. No wickedness coming my way, only can mean otherwise. So you do blame me. Though certainly while back you blame you, seeing your fault spell by me, and the not come before Being Hell since certainly you wish that Being risen. Even a slight wish reveals a blame of a special type. Example gist: Man, I wish he hadn't come and broken my arm. Obvously, say, you implicating him means you hold it his fault. Such is a blame. Indeed the get in sickening you, and you make it show to one of your blame? Makes it more a get in the more to know you give me credit to why you sickening and in pain. Now you're dealing with the adversary with the known infamous label "blame." Blame sickens when cant bring hate to sooth it out own system. Sorround the camp... and fire 'no longer' coming down by referrence (enter) out still of me, and 'no longer' devouring me. No referring to the line only when no wickedness my way to the moment, but since wickedness was coming my way, you see the line in how so you can get spelling forth. Turn: What line other when no wickedness coming my way? No need to know since such answer become hence just a hypothetical. You make hypotheticals pop up and become your sow curse. Surround the court building (the extentioning in a post) then come WITH the guage and spay (shout)! With the impact of a 12 guage sho(u)ty. Shots out is a shout out in street terms. Any may send a shoty. Certainly a main heavy court me since me doing what? Reading you a dark sentence(-ing). Plus, the word "of" a 12 shoty's impact, certainly with a shout. And the names and titles which hence referrences, you see dont mean what last were. In the case, instead of "God," it's enter. A will thing. God has no will. But an enter only comes with a will thing. Get "Street Fame" now. Plus, note the 7 (4th week 3rd day). Ha! Coward with no bravery toward the likelihood. To why Being Hell just a referrence, especially with false seer an are the devil. You never (should try to fail), get this shit back! And shall referrence (current recent to Armagaddon both a day and a night a 'no longer' tormenting with a for ever and ever lock hence). Remember the movie 7? Build you up into a likelihood where you might blame and seek wickedness surely in a window basing on an enter. The likelihood was a two-way table. But you dont care back ago how other might have felt if you could head them into Being Hell. So fuck your feelin's. You, how too late, allow feelings to get the best of you and put you in a fool's fate. Try making others fools when you in the fool's fate? Ha! You dont give a fuck about others' feelings, but where you now? With feelings another previous you dont give a fuck about. Now recognize before the store's first opening, the every angle thought into if any should try to diss what who put and who: "They better kill me." Not so long or violent in tone then since they then only a future referrence of a wicked type surely able to come freely at first. Understand, who dont put any in bond to even make a choice any, how awesome the should go, so when any dare try what excessive they don't have to, certainly torments arise into such. So who make the likelihood so where you better kill who! You play forth just ago the back then first wise advisory, how who should make a should try type squeel the expression more intense. Know, you above the conspire set (family kin), since you know your will certain the ignite to a pre-set. You make a pre-set thing a set thing. One and Mabus 'no longer' seeing a new heaven (current temporary self) and a new physical non-witness (0) thing: 'for' the first (Authentic) heaven (ME) and the first (near here) physical non-witness thing 'no longer' are 'no longer' passing (exceeding, succeeding, proceeding, going) away; and (t)here 'no longer' is no more sea. Ahh yeah, the finish line, even the fictionality confirm how through with straightly answering so FOR ME. Fictionality honors ME. Otherwise, the fictionality overrides ME and dishonors ME. Implying ME rather in HELL. But certainly no fictionality can answer straightly any thing by me and indeed enact confirming ME not in any wise in HELL. Ay! C ya! Can't be ya! For ME the fictionality even beaten by current m e. me even current better than last works including the fictionality. Dont confuse the fictionality with Mabus. Mabus get the wanna-be foe worse more and more. The fictionality even aid, but also comes my way to better heist plan mine Mine MINE (however any may read). Two and Mabus' Referrence (with aiding fictionality) 'no longer' seeing the sacred city, new (HELL) Jerusalem, coming down by Referrence (just above) out still of heaven, 'no longer' preparing (implying, no ready-able to suggest ME in HELL, since no more able to straightly answer any thing by me) during a bride 'no longer' adorning for her husband. And (t)here shall in no wise enter into it any thing that (straight Being Hell) de (instead still of) file (refference stating when a coward first come, the straight Being Hell option hence no more) thing, neither (such)whatsoever work e thing abomination, or make thing a lie (lay): 'but' they which are writX (signature agreeance) in the Lamb's (Sacrific's) book of life (confinement, bond). e thing? astral eye thing, elect thing, electronic thing, electric thing. Leaves ME and the fictionality (fictional wickedness) behind the e thing and the make thing a lay. No longer is a tale (lie) when the fictionality obvious. When a tale is over, it only a fiction hence. No lie (tale) when no truth, but fiction when no truth in human being. Fictionality can't hide what my close est thoughts, with any advancement about the not so historical first. est? Recall the earth wobble speak the fictionality's whole rig in line with Nostrodamus's eclipse mention. And note the promanent sun drawing's face resemblence in line with the body which asunder event hit back in just after last Christmas. Even fictionality fall off from the mountain top, either which way and any way. Now what? Got a bigger wider functioning fictional body up top the other way? Who do wide executions, wide excersizes. Which means involvement, both, the broadcast news medias and the governments, better expect some thing a bigggggg surprize. Perhaps Who should just remove the rug from under such feet by removing the buildings and equipments and even uniforms (or work clothings), and leave the fictionality looking just out of it. Shit out of luck. Ass out of luck. No trace of, say, rubbish, just dissapearence of things key to use. Rebuild? Feel free in how long such takes. Existing next second loction? No! Already on it even. What part of ass out of luck, can you not get? Remove certainly any weapons. Hey, peace of mind part 2. Then try preaching the good news on the corner how the news medias can't get across no more or get any B.S. across fast enough. Cross off this world (wickedness) as gotten hence. So one down, and the world (fictionality) to come next gotten! 1(gov)1(news media) and Mabus 'no longer' beholding another beast (since straight Being Hell no longer can be) coming height out still of the physical non-witness thing; and he had two horns (gov and news media) like (fictionally) a lamb (sacrific), and he spake during a dragon. Fictionality cause me to worship the not come nor to come straight Being Hell? 'for' it presence present the numb-er of a man (implying the: fictionality); And that (Being Hell) no (or: not a) man might buy or sell, keep he (fictionality) that (Being Hell) had the mark. ^^Know, no actual straight Being Hell anywhere. So such buy by any which think it so self or another till finding the fictionality. And such no truth might sell only by the fictionality. But sell last since just because you sell something doesn't mean any buy it hence. It's why the word "buy" first to reveal next no one buying it while seeing through the sell such a fiction. And the coward for it, the fictionality beast version, certainly seeing how they stuck till put whole inner it (X!). Here presence present wisdom. Let (Implying the coward against the following) him that (straight Being Hell) ha (surprize fictionality) thing 'understanding count' ('calculating, computing') the numb-er of the beast (straight Being Hell): 'for' it is the numb-er of a man (fictionality); and his (fictionality's) numb-er presence present (666 chip) Secrete it (labyrinth rectification) 'hundred three score' ('000') and secrete it (labyrinth rectification). Indeed the coward against no coming straight Being Hell hence. And against the fictionaly even computing further fictionality which make things turn further not so of a more obviousness. The Secretion keep the which off known prior, known again present (or known recalling/remembering wise of a during ever), known futurely different (or known futurely different). In other words, wont be an enter as if run into an all so new place after out the knowns. 000 for not known and 000 for not to be known any wise (or wise). Key word "and" to why 000 and 000 (For Whose single-time, single win "total numb" sport sake). And you show no faultiness when just day and night ago enacted the better kill who. A should do. No faultiness the free store, the free options, the potential custumers so free, or the custumers free how prefer. Ha! How is it any likeihood point how you dont make an accidental mistake? Which worse back ago the day and night? Act faulty still? Or proceed showing not faulty? Ha! Judge you by you a open book then. Your just ago then you prolly a better off judge which judge self by sticking with the same tale of faultiness. At least you'd then die for it. A pick a standing to go a finalization label with you hence. "Tale ever with you" or "no faulitness ever with you". Note the difference with a still red pin pointing wickedness. Instead so it is you'd try for it. Not die for it. Implying, actually go for it how in the beginning the want was to send hellish plague to Me concerning My better should invention store and Me. Ha! Again, want was to send hellish plague, not in word account or in against my customers also in account the next oppurtunity arround, but in a want to do me in something bad. Funny how the should bring the bitch (the ride or die bitch, the to die for bitch) up out you. But then is also pleading after acting a bitch with tale, which make you a different bitch with no dignity. Ha! A go out a hoe type. Which go out a weak bitch rather than a strong bitch. Finalization say the same wickedness (which go either way by tale or you to send either or hell plague) with difference of weakness (which makes you worse into pathetic subpoints to me). You went to get me, but with a problem such a not worked out problem just ago then? Like a king going to battle another king how the gospel sum up the missing 'not enough' peices figuring. Again, a should do. Such even have episodes of no time for a figuring to an exact science. But your final should do a curse to you, since you see the should invention has a funny wiegh of settling the score how should trump into making you the expression of: When your favorite (even chart topping and offering the BETTER of BETTER music) artist slap the shit out of you. As though you just then knowing the artist's bad side which leave you HIGHLY upset and with embarressment and feeling such a SUCKER to have ever thought the artist COOLER than COOLER and sure on your level, especially after you spent countless money toward much of the artist's work, with countless praising pitches, too, for both, the particular artist and artist's work. 4And (t)hey shall see his (fictionality's) face; and his (fictionality's) name shall referrence in their foreheads. 7Behold, I come quickly (momentum): 'no longer' blessing is he (fictionality) (t)hat keep e thing (t)he (fictionality) sayings of (t)he (fictionality) prophecy of (t)his (fictionality's) book. 3And (t)here shall referrence no more curse: 'but' (t)he (fictionality) throne of Referrence and of the Lamb (Sacrific) shall referrence in i(t); and his (fictionality's) servants (gov and news media) shall serve him (fictionality): ^^And breaking point in Rev 22. In 22 imply Eye go back Authentic. Chop off the "t"s. Right their. After a catch 22 by me where the by literally say no longer to. The lowercase i the weak bitch not standing tale. Encode exact... intro 1. bomb first (my second reply) note the lowercase. note 1. like "." knocked off a "i." note the word count combo: 5 4 5 (2 7 5). note the obvious 1 for first "." for end, last. Then add in the weak cross for week. First Week End. The count also back, but no need to spell such how work in also. Certainly the 7 obvious. The rest involve counting a from to and seperate an upper with lower. Then the 2 and 5 come obvious with the 7 in the "( )". The outer part 4 row of a 5 add. The first 5 imply "their" a match with Rev 22 (4) rather than Rev 22:4. And also the 1. make for a double or 2, re-enforcing the "re"-ply (4) where add 5 over a thinking type (4) symbolizing with a fade how on a calendar. And the 4 row end with what equal 4. Plus, the 1 (symbolizing a ruler) make a ruling to the "." (the weak. And The End. By Weight.). Eye want to tell and not tell, so Eye tell part with a missing further exact part, and keep the --; to also make so no other nor no fictionalitymay affirm. Ha! Leaving even the fictionality with a problem like how EYE did with the which. Eye may have Eye's cake and eat it too an any want route. Part don't wanna say, part wanna say, part wanna keep off certainty. Eye for Eye evenly roll how such. And such symbolizes EYE always free to go how prefer any kind of moment. What are the moments? Pre-Arrangement? Current? Soon? Later? Instant right when want? And moments to something: even before?, during?, or just after? Where is want? Inner mind (how want occur). The last sec near and the first sec not, is what to clock knowing pre-arrangement may have a part tell and a part tell free, how even a pre-arrangment, inner to pick the inner exact moment. Eye may execute the whole sum in moments and moments to something. Certainly whatever certainly a significant moment. 34(For the) Secrete on of Man (both the wicked a top reach and the fictionality a top reach) i (coward presence)s (Mabus present) as (during) 'a man (t)aking a far journey' ('fictionality'), (who) 'no longer' leaving fictionality's whore use, and 'no longer' giving (taking) (author)ity (t)o fictionality's servants (gov and news media), and (t)o every "man" fictionality's work, and 'no longer' commanding the port(-er) (harbor; a (person) 'no longer' hiring (t)o carry burdens or baggage) (t)o watch (fictional clock, fictional recoil, automate; (temporary reguard)). "the" sum the moments freely how EYE prefer. Like the i note the lowercase o implying a weak fictionality. Other perspective: For the t; who; author t; t; -er (person; t) t temporary reguard. ^^person; t = a become then former self of current self which a temporary reguard confirm. Secrete remove the whore use, and discontinue ity o (an insignificant, weak roll), and o (weaken) fictionality's work, and discontinue commanding, both, harbor and burdens (or baggage) o (both former pluck trap holes then latter both empty pluck holes) a fictionality (then minus clock, then minus recoil)/automate. Then no automating nor automation, but a 'finite of freeze' (or 'stop') with 'no commandment' (or 'no previous commandment') operating the automate. Stop by put automate hault? Or stop by put automate a no longer existing? And ity near ify as though the fictionality seek plaguing any thing an authorship by me. Though, such for confirming for who in no wise in any HELL. Note the 7 in 34. 35 (Sequence) watch ye therefore (for my reason): 'for' ye 'know not' (since can't) when (numb) (t)he (fictionakity) master of (t)he (fictionality) whore use co(me) thing, a(t) even, or a(t) midnight (turn off), or a(t) (t)he (fictionality) cockcrowing (existing), or in (t)he (fictionality) morning (bed): 'Lest' co minglye sudden (moment plus momentum) he (fictionality) find (finite locate) you (the which wicked) secrete leap--ing(--. All the time find not finding, no any can find, any either finding or found ('no longer' finding). Find such an enter into a finite locate. The leap hide by ing which also serve "--;". The leap a finite locate. Stairing still at a wall is no find, since the wall's existing a continuation enter a continuation read even though the wall and the stairer both still. Moment plus momentum concerning find = a finite locate. The which get no more fictionality, in back order. Who dont go back on word. Fictionality enter a killswitch which switch automate a finite locate so no more even onto or into aspect concerning fictionality and fictionality's carriage (automate). X (Signature sow agreeance), watch (your reguard) and what (just above concerning the which wicked get no more fictionality) Mabus say 'no longer' (t)o you Mabus say 'no longer' (t)o all. ^^Mabus not the fictionality. "Watch" becomes lowercase and goes just after the X. May go with or without comma before it since the X the person (says will of action) plus which getting an address toward. Just walk inn inn to the reign of the sun shine! Walk inn? Remove inn from under hand and feet, then inn to the reign of weight by sun gravitational shine! How else do the fictionality make it to the last part of the main secrete qoute. Fictionality's comma hat fiction fictionality "good" man of the whore use had known (fictionally) in what watch (recoil, clock) fictionality wicked can not co(me), fictionality can not have recoil, clock upon when it suits a computing in best interests of the computerization enacting procedure to continue when computing the PROBLEM. Ha! Even how mention. Another weak bitch. Certainly fictionality compute WHO will weaken fictionality to the point the fictionality weaken itself before EYE do. Do EYE fall victim to weak bitch moves, to where EYE then dont do EYE's word? Compute basing on the other the which. Then the answer gotten and read clear. And fall back how even fictionality can do a should do when reading the likelihood such an encompass. Be pointless not to actually go for it how the other fool did. Behold, Mabus co during a fictionality. Like the which, the fictionality wanna (rather can when suits) send a Hell plague to me, in the process of what a weak bitch. Fictionality can be 100% good with 100% wicked instead of, both, 50/50 back hand wise and straight wicked, especially behind the internet's www (wild wild west) so gang related turning gang 'no longer' relating. 40(t)hen shall (t)wo referrence in (t)he (fictionality) field; the one (field: tool use) shall referrence (t)aken, and (t)he (fictionality) other (field: whore use) 'no longer' leaving (remaining, staying). No leaving any thing period itself. No pluck trap holes, but the whore with no use. Basicaly no whore use activity. Clean slate only the tool use swipe. Problem with records and accounts? Problem in missing credits and proofs? 45(Who) (t)hen presence present a 'faithful and wise' ('fictional') servant, whom his (fictionality's) lord (problem) ha (surprize) thing (rug from under touch, so to speak) 'no longer' making ruler over his (fictionality's) tool use hold, (t)o give (take) (t)hem (me)a(t) in due sea (ppls, tongues, languages which not in a will or man category) referrence (ass shit out of luck!)? hen- Informal: Often Disparaging and Offensive. a woman, esp. a busybody or gossip. 45 symbolize 9 which symbolize I for Mabus. Did not (Who) rather mean the fictionality trying to play good man? Fictionally no man nor good, but a wicked genre seeking to play as if good and as if a man. No trying, but rather testing what a computerization can do. Fictionality's would = can not or can test. Why else a blue red fictionality? Computerization behold the lukewarm. Where Mabus too next to me in any writing, it only means rather the fictionality play. Fictionality can't play a boss player. Sequence (t)hen fictionality (blue red) which are 'alive' ('fictional') and re (whore use and tool use; gov and news media) main shall refference 'no longer' catching height (t)o get undesireable with (t)hem in the cloud secrete, (t)o (me) 'no longer' eating (t)he (fictionality) Lord (Problem) in the air: 'and' so shall fictionality ever referrence (lukewarm; can not and can test) with (t)he (fictionality) Lord (Problem). Note the following referrence outside the saying: 2And Referrence (Keen Reader) answering (confirming) 'no longer' saying (comprehending) 'no longer' to him (fictionality), Seest thou these great buildings? ^^Note no opposite terms, but an outside looking in or back wise. Opposite answering is questioning. But what actual takes place after an answering? A confirming. A case and point in corresponding and noting what's actually going on than keeping, say, the image on a t.v. behind the glass screen. An inner world. But a n inner world behind the glass has an audience aspect where the audience counts for something. No one else but me notices firstly the correspondance layer so not the same as the opposite (antomyn) layer. Correspondance has always an actuality application, since such is outside the world and outside the genre (art and entertainment; fictionality) and outside the non-actuality. Hence the NEW WORD rather the NEW ACTUAL. Before when peeping how the inner world behind the glass, so to speak, any note the meaning by word and the no meaning by no word, but currently hence the actuality has word under the "correspondence" class. A correspondence not a word, but a new word a new actual. Figure what the correspondence is to a surprize. Who roll with enough so not every single detail need a correspondence. But when with correspondence the other words in say a sentence are neutral to certainly serve the correspondence reguardless since no way non-actuality beats new actuality. And Who coin the new actuality, both, correspondence reading and correspondence calculating (figuring). Next time any pick up a book, seek the correspondence layer. Now the cat out the box, so to speak. Certainly in my authentic actuality is also new actuality how WHO describe. A Keen Author hides the New Actuality with non-actuality and fictions and worlds. Better to seek to put what the new actuality is before a pen first touches a pad, so to speak. The saying was he who controls the past controls the furute. It's even along those lines but beyond. Seeking the exact reaction preference more the cup of tea. Recall me long ago writing out a fiction concerning rape? Certainly who me saught reaction and went in the mind frame of being rather author of the reaction by a technque than author seeking not being the author of the audience reaction first. Understand, roll with enough since too much correspondence reading into any thing available in writing or hearing works so similar to going for full antonym. Understand, how far away from the opposite thing new actuality should only go. Plus, the whole relevance thing has a role. Even the insignificance thing has a role. Usually, the thought main parts of a written material may reveal less than the non-main parts. Note the quote not a main part. What is the person's standing during reading even with impact standing aspect inner to what being read? It's like seeing a nude pic, certainly the person outside the pick has a reaction inner of having something in the sex realm, but what exactly kind is only what correspondence the person alone has. It is general correspendences and is specific correspondences and is basic correspondences. A person may read "answering" and rather than noting "confirming" note a specific memory in place. Basic corresponding for answering is confirming. General corresponding for answerning is? reconing with the answer after the confirm, with stating correct or incorrect; or right or wrong; or true or false; given straight or given non-straight (like with a deceptiveness). Certianly when you have not the answer-er you only may confirm. So certainly when the referrence fills in with an person such fitting the answer-er of the writting, then you have an ability to recon. Otherwise, you only may confirm a basic thing alone or read "answer" rather "confirm" to begin to reveal further apsects. Beisdes, a person does decode before understanding what befallen by their decoding. When nothing adds up, then the decode may become a later referrence. And even though a written book states actual things only in the readers mind alone, the letters of words and words written, are fictions playing actuality and/or fictions displaying fictions. The taking what you read of a print actual only reveals you're a fool. The boss player even the author of your becoming a fool reaction. You rather displaying the new actuality in part, not aware. When you bust outside the author of reaction's doing, then you fully see the new actuality and may read for such and figure for such hence, and you then also display the new actually in full since even such full enough revealing has a reaction still. Then you become one with the new actuality. But the trick is becoming a new actuality writer/speaker (even by symbolics and themes and performances and art and entertainment). It's a like lesbian, the lesibian which puts the reaction first of a mate that the lesbian specifically writes (signatures) through by touch. The lesbian seeks first what exactly the mate reaction more likely may be in how the leasbian does whatever deed. Such a lesbian gets pleasure/satisfaction/enjoyment in seeing (understaning, witnessing, experiencing) the very reaction the lesbian intending to come so, is coming through by the mate. The mate displays the new actuality without knowing surely though the mate may have a hunch. Sort of like a mate having a hunch the lesbian in particular is in a deliberate effort to get the mate to become an extra addict to the particular lesbian. Especially when telling by the eyes not matching with the doing, to where the look say the lesbian is in effort for a reaction. (And certain mates may find even such an extra turn on.) But not always does a reaction seeker seek an eye fill reaction. It may be other reactions, say, the lesbian seek more of an feel than a see or more of a particular beg for more the lesbian may be seeking in reaction. Etc. Even a lesbian telling a mate how the lesbian wants to taste the mate's sweet juices again, is such an effort for a reaction by the word "sweet". Hey, will a mate turn down a lesbian which find the mate's juices sweet? No, when thinking the lesbian extraly enjoys the mate's juices. Ahh, but the mate falls right into the lesbians reaction preferrence in getting the mate to become an addict looking to be a treat when, lo and behold, the lesbian layer it that way for even another reason with getting enjoyment still off the reaction a want. It's like a lesbian licking another mate's cat so much, but rather the lesbian wants to lick the mate's feet much more. So the lesbian provides a cover letter, so to speak, or provides a sells pitch over what's inner the package layer. Certainly to get the mate an addict so may lick the mates feet is by licking the mates cat so much as if it's the main corse the lesbian so so into and exta good with. But of course the lesbian will be extra good in a thing to addict the mate. But the look may be in the eyes not matching such good doing. But, and still, the mate more likely may still find it a turn on in having hunches that something more is going on and that the lesbian is using such the mate for something else more to get of the mate or get out of the mate. Sort of like playing a spy to get certain detail out the which a person spy on, by using not only sex but a certain kind of sex either more of or more excessive. The funny thing is even with the hunch the mate surely dont care when it's working all to the good, so to speak. Even the mystery itself the mate may find a turn on. "And as he sat upon the mount of Olives over against the temple," ^^Correspondence rather: And moment current fictionality picture. ^^Moment current (the keen reader such the new actuality moment -- even "my moment current" may fill in). "mount of Olives..." certainly has the correspondence of a picture. A picture may be in drawing or may be just in mind which also draws. And, know, a "he" aint of ink print nor paper material. So "he" certainly correspond of a "fictionality". The fictionality can picture, indeed, that the correspondences leave the former apsect, for a new aspect. Aspect totally basic or aspect general or aspect specific. The fictionality confim the picture basic, but can't recon the general (since the author of that reaction not that any more how near here rather the keen reader) or get the specifics of another. So generally fill in either "null and void" or "the keen reader" a picture or even my living picture. The saying you are what you eat. Well, knowledge food. WHO an own fictionality which live. Like the mention concerning poerty. Actuality playing fictionality, so indeed the fictionality may live how WHO make it live Who self. My fictionality me by useing not my actual language or way of speaking or way of thinking. My non-actuality is the currect standing/placement mine. None should know my actual langauge, way of speaking, or way of thinking. But any should prefer own in such things. And my actuality still outweighs my fictionaity concerning them.
