Peer-reviewed study proves twin towers demolished

Yet the corporate lapdog media remains silent.

URL:

http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

Danish Scientist on WTC nano-thermite (Danish TV):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_tf25lx_3o

 

Cmon dude!!! they are silent cause its rubbish!!!! LOL

:cheers2:

 

So let's see your scientific evidence.

 

Hold your horses, Rat.

http://uncensored.co.nz/2009/04/12/...t-nano-thermite-found-in-the-dust-at-the-wtc/

 

This is a pay-to-publish journal which is not taken seriously.

It has zero credibility.

Come on, is this a joke?

 

Sorry to say it Hip but no these guys are not joking. Since I have been coming to these forums I have heard the WTC was destroyed by the following:

1. A laser beamed weapon from outer space.

2. A UFO

3. And my favorite,,,,,, Israel.

Very Sad indeed. Most are very young like 18 or something so that makes them what????? 10 when the trade center happened??? LOL ,,, Im laughing but that doesn't mean they can't bring good info to the table but I just think it's funny that when this all took place they were still not allowed to cross the street alone.

 

I'm skeptical myself, but to use age as a discriminating factor on credibility is absurd. If someone does the research, they should have valid points.

 

Did you read my post?????? that is why I said it doesnt mean they cant bring good info ..... wake up yo!

 

Yeah, I looked that up too. There's nothing peer reviewed about it.

 

you still said it as if you somehow think younger people's opinion aren't as qualified as someone's who was older at the time.

 

No you didn't look it up. If you did, you would have provided a link. The thing is, you almost never are able to provide the evidence for the claims you make.

The Open Chemical Physics Journal is well-respected and peer-reviewed.

Find here links to two further peer-reviewed papers which also relate to the presence of large quantities of thermite in the dust from the collapsed WTC 1 and 2:

Kevin R. Ryan, James R. Gourley and Steven E. Jones, “Environmental
anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic
materials,” The Environmentalist, August 4, 2008.

http://www.springerlink.com/content/f67q6272583h86n4/fulltext.pdf
http://www.springerlink.com/content/f67q6272583h86n4/fulltext.html

 

dont you understand rat by "peer reviewed" they mean that someone in the main stream media has to come out and say these findings are credible.

it doesnt matter what the credentials of the person doing the study is,nor whether 5 or 50,000 qualified people stand behind the report,if the MSM doesnt report it as fact they aint buying it.

one need only look at the global warming fallacy to see that..

 

It is pay to publish. It is a joke.

It is not, in your wildest fantasies, well respected.

 

The Open Chemical Physics Journal is a peer-reviewed journal which aims to provide the most complete and reliable source of information on current developments in chemical physics. The emphasis will be on publishing quality papers rapidly and freely available to researchers worldwide.

http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/

So, are they not being honest?

 

At the end of the paper by Harrit et al, the following dates are stated:

Received: August 12, 2008, Revised: February 10, 2009, Accepted: February 13, 2009

So, there is apparently some kind of review process that occurs for that journal. It's more a question of how stringent the review is and the credentials of the reviewers compared with those of established peer-reviewed printed research journals.

To date, only 12 papers have been published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal.

That particular journal apparently started in 2008, although Bentham has been around much longer. It's difficult to assess how reputable a journal is with that few publications.

.

 

Well Rat has assessed that it is well respected, he surely has some basis for that conclusion.

 

I see.. the rubble of a collapsed steel and aluminum building contained iron oxide (rust) and aluminum... stop the presses.

 

until they release the footage of the people actually getting on the planes to the general public. who is anybody here to say those people really were arab?

 

people pay to go to college and university. does that mean their degrees are worthless? hardly

 

Most of the authors of the paper by Harrit are the familiar faces of the 9/11 truth movement of years past: Steven Jones (put on leave by BYU after his speculative and accusatory theories that secretly planted thermite destroyed the WTC); Kevin Ryan (disgruntled former worker from UL who was let go after using the company name to prop up his conspiracy theory about 9/11); Frank Legge (whose name frequently appears on writings by Jones). Hoffman is acknowledged in the paper. He is known for his theory that thermobaric bombs destroyed the towers based on his faulty interpretation of the post-collapse dust plume.

.