What truth inside (theory or not)

Creationism is misfit number one. Evolution is misfit number two. Creationsim had it worse, originally. Then Evolution popped its then enemy head forth, and got it, too, worse in seperate wise. And both are: "Enemy of MISFITS."

Evolution is a guard of the same like mindedness of the first misfit (creationism). Evolution should have guarded in the wise of nothing more, nothing less, while along with understanding and knowing the message formula of great, rolling warning which even the first misfit acted certain as.

Lesson learned after it is too late: Messages in any form, even in the science fiction realm of, say, "Gog and Magog," turn true in the fact of the phrase "anything is possible," or in the fact of the simple word "can" which certain would stand by, especially when in either an obvious changeable labyrinth type universe or an obvious paradox type universe. And both, creationism and then evolution, are torment sent and torment bound. By own sow in of a Universal, Co-op pre-set rule, which then make it a murder conspiracy of an extra, inside double-cross of great seeming coincidence delusion plus great seeming randomness delusion. Note that coincidence and randomness are idol gods of worship, where you either think either a curse or a lucky blessing.

It come known a point in time, times, and a half, in where the misfits can not be torment senders in how they wish they would be in a still amounting (like a bad post whore).

But what do each reader think in this obviously bright season of such apocalyptic, universal news in the actuality an any eye full?

 

Truely any which claim the currently only known planet (Earth) is awesome, are the enemy of misfits. Even the Universe tell it is not awesome. So any acting like they know better than the Universe, is of those which try to hide the bad as a little thing of insignificance, especially while the Universe intentionally be loading the bad on big just to make the misfit see how cornered it been in telling an obvious tale.

If any follow the bible, as is, then such know to hate mother and father. Is not mother and father the very known Earth (and its orderings and its makings)? It is great reason why any should hate the known earth (and its orderings and its makings). Any male not liking the idea of being a bastard come format rather than a somebody's son come format, is which don't hate mother (Earth by its makings) and father (Earth by its orderings). Any male just fine with knowing the opposite sex is of the same sex in array aspects when looking into detail of the science realm, is which dont hate mother (Earth by its makings) and father (Earth by its orderings).

Think not to speak against the only known "Earth" which is come an only known for a reason? The reason is pro toward those which think outside the box of the ideal, beyond type thinker kind. Such are fruitful. But the reason is anti toward the opposite in how the opposite are of the sub-plain (negative plain) type thinker kind. Such are the unfruitful.

On earth..

Hate not how food spoil? Hate not how electronic device type machines malfunction? Hate not how certain things dont heal? Hate not how certain on the planet are starving? Hate not how extortion goes on? Hate not parental governings? Hate not how it takes time to learn something or train for something? Hate not how clothes ware and tare and keep stains? Hate not how bugs infest a place or come to a person to sting or to bite or make physically ill? Hate not how you do step on bugs, and kill them as an eventual type thing, especially when having to note the crush sound or the juices? LOL! Funny only when saying it, but bothersome in living when come facing it time after time. Hate not how a bug stains your wall after you smash it, since knowing you just cant ask it to leave out or easily direct it out? Hate not etc. of the Earth?

On sub-plain which keep further lack in orderings of Earth...

Anyone which like, say, porn see how one should hate how it is only set up on Earth. It is porn genres, which one may select obviously, but the negative part is that one lacks the ability to go fuller specific in what they want to see. If I want a lesbo porn of the specifics of what I'd call a fine chick with blond hair on a fine chick with black hair... Why the hell I dont see the option which allow me to quickly find the juicy specifics I want then to see, anywhere on Earth? Why must I settle for the eventually coming cross something juicy I wanted to see, say, a long time back? Again, hate not the Earth by its makings and by its orderings? If I feel like right then and there seeing what I call beautiful on beautiful in doing a specific thing, in the watchable porno realm, without having to loose so much time in finding it, then it is better certainly. I dont like the only YA GET WHAT YA GET way. But the sub-pain type claim liking such way. And the coincidence and the randomness, both, delusions, certain worship on Earth under the YA GET WHAT YA GET way. Maybe I want my Mickey D breakfast meal at 6pm, and my Mickey D lunch/dinner meal at 8am. Again, hate not the Earth by its orderings and by its makings?

 

Dude . . . do you just like open a dictionary to a random page, roll your finger down to a random word, then repeat over and over, then fill in with some conjunctions and propositions and periods to give some semblance of some grammatical structure?

I don't mean to be a dick but I can never decipher any meaning from your posts.