So here it is do you think for ur brain or does it think for you, so ur brain is in ur head with heaps of random thoughts spinning around just the usual shit, and than ur like its m yturn and take control of ur brain and think for it, but when it comes to likes and diss likes, do you chosse or is it pre programed into ur brain that you will like some thing, for me if i see some thing i like its not yes or no, just i no that i like it like i didnt evan have to think same as if you didnt like it, but if you dont like some thing and it grows on you are u telling ur bran that you like it and reprogrameing ur bran and takeing controll of ur thoughts and saying yes i like it, brains can be deep, some dont accept the true concept of thinking, i tried my bes to describe the situation but like always you see it diffrent in your head, peace out all and leave ur thoughts, indulge us all in ur creative thinks and patterns of thoughts, find the manny clours and textures, nothing is ever black whait or gray , caio
that makes so much sense its like when i hear a song that i love i just instantly click and then like when theres just a random song that i dont like at first i tell myself to listen to it again and then like yeh i think that certain things appeal to our brains cuz ever1"s brainis different
most ppl see it that way i am looking for a negative so i can chalange them to an interlectual convo, rock out party partner
You are your brain, they are not separate entities. I think the brain is programmed by its environment and can be set up in anyway it(you) want it to. Some might say that liks and disliks are genetic but idk if we will ever kno fursur. there are just too many variables with the way someone is raised
We are our brain. Our bodies are the drones of our brain, constantly working for us and doing everything commanded to, or at least trying. Our spines are the telephone pole wires that allow our brain to call our body parts and tell them what to do. Some things in our bodies do things automatically without our brains telling them, though. Take our hearts, for example. It's always pumping until we die, and we can't stop it. We always think that the body is the person, but the body is the worker for the person. There you go.
its like this. my Brain controls my body's motions, tells it when things "hurt", and so on.... I die if i get shot in the head (in most cases). I have Free Will. I can eat things i dont like. i can make decisions. so i guess what it is .... My brain Thinks for me(so i think for me... lol), but i can Make a decision to change my MIND on a certain matter. My Brain is My Existence. but is it really? i can be "brain dead" and be alive on life support. correct? or no....
yeh mate, just watch out how deep you go, ive been lost in there many a times, no always a bad thong tho
It's all energy anyway and perhaps we grow so accustomed we can't see it for the beauty that it really is. But whether or not there's a soul is another matter. Which comes first, feelings or thoughts? Feelings. I'd say your feelings determine how you feel...
totaly off topic.. but ... white dove... hmm does that refer to rolls, i once ate some white doves.. they were beautful.
this is related to the "mind-body" problem if i'm not mistaken. i haven't even settled on dualism or monism at this point, to be honest. too many variables to consider. philosophy of mind is one of the most intriguing and exhausting fields to contemplate, personally.
I think I agree with both the belief that feelings are justified by the feeling itself and also that they are justified by pre-programmed or self-programmer thoughts. To some extent feelings are also genetic. This makes sense, if you look at how new generations of kids are usually quicker to pick up on things that the previous generation used and entertained themselves with. If this wasn't the case, I question why is that we make new things? The answer is that the old things become to easy due to some inborn memory passed from out fathers. The reason I say I agree with both - that emotions are justified by themselves. "I like what I like and I do it because I like it" in contrast to, "I know what I like, even though I may not 'feel' like I like it yet" OR "I know what I like and I 'feel' like I like it" . The main reason I agree with both is that life is about pleasure. Presently, my life is best lived with a mix of both. Why? Well, the main reason is because I cannot change the way I like things AND more importantly, it is pleasurable to ACT on what you like, initially. Ie. You like to be self-destructive. Initially you get pleasure from acting out that feeling. Yet, later you pay consequences for it. The biggest question in my mind is when does a feeling become worth following, out of the fact that you have the feeling? Also, what do you make about feelings that make you think a certain way about someone? Another question is, is it better to fight the feelings of fitting in? Its all very confusing to me, I come from a past that is really turbulent due to unforseen circumstances that made me feel like I was going to die, for years. It is hard to determine whether it is better to do this or another or another, because I havent had a point in my life where it has been calm.
Hey dazedgypsy - yeah we should have a chat one day. Its my favorite subject tooo! I remember seeing you in that thread about nudism that thread was so bogus, I didnt get anything out of it, these people were so closed minded and they pretend like they are open minded simply because they are nudist.
whenever i listen to my brain it always gives good info--so my brain said turn right here but i argued with it and right over the hill was a police checkpoint---another time my brain said start a conversation with the bar maid i didnt argue that time and we went home together--ive learned to listen to my brain even when the thought is unconventional for me and i have over a 90 % success rate with it---soo my brain thinks for me and im good at listening to it now--------
