Apparently he said this. I'm totally shocked. What a ****. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8141069.stm
Surely you would only be shocked if you were naive enough to not realise this is precisely the kind of thing Nick Giriffin and the BNP have been saying for years. It's hopefully a good thing that his opinion is now being sought more often by the mainstream media, in that he now has the perfect chance to hang himself with his own nasty little brand of ignorant rubbish. Exposing the idiocy of these people is far more successful than trying to silence them. I hope...
I like how he feigns some sort of concern for the people here. "Oh no people are suffering and dying to get over here! I know, let's sink their fucking boats as a precautionary measure! I'm a genius. "
And if we sink their boats, they are either going to drown, or end up on our shores where it is harder to monitor them! So basically we are in the same position as before, only we've killed a few of them, only we don't know how many.
Im not. Hes always been a ****, and has said worse. Actually seems to think its ok...I think he needs more eggs
Forget throwing shit at him. Get the News of the World to hack into his phone and record him stating he likes big black booty.
Nazi Nick has apparently refuted claims that he is a fascist, citing that he only suggested blowing up the boats full of immigrants as they leave the shore of Libya, and throw them lifeboats. I'm not sure how they would identify these boats as containing immigrants heading for Britain, or how they would blow them up without risking the lives of any of the passengers, but then of course, Nick Griffin is an idiot, so you can't expect anything more than this kind of bullshit. He also apparently has two rottweilers called Ann and Frank, named after the little jewish girl who hid in a house in Amsterdam during the second world war. Great! I've got two little kittens and I am going to name them Nick and Griffin LOL
how many people can the uk sustainably feed and clothe would you be prepared to have a one child policy or not have children or bring in euthanasia to allow more people to settle here . Im just asking those questions because they will in the near future have to be faced . our present society is based on fossil fuels which are starting to peak we have a uk population near 70 million with estimates we could support 30 million .
How many economic migrants are in this country? A few million? I don't know. I do know why they are here and what would happen if there were not enough jobs or it became too crowded. Helped, also, by our newish points based system to get into the country in the first place. We could - push comes to shove - feed and clothe 150 million people...probably not house them...but, lets go with the migration watch an BNP figure of 70 million in the near future. Ye, I do think we could quite easily clothe, feed and house that many people. The only people that seem to be really concerned about the No. of people in this country and how would we cope, seems to be the BNP. Because the more people there are, the more likely there will be more foreigners making those No.s up. Do you want to reconsider what you are saying here...
I think it would be very differcult to impossible to feed clothe and keep warm 70 million people in the uk without massive amounts of fossil fuels. in theory if you turned the entire country to the most intensive gardening you could maybe feed 200 million but thats very unlikely to happen . I dont think we have some sort of duty to allow millions of people to enter europe or the uk even if those people are starving or poor . without fossil fuels we are going to have a hard time and its madness to add to that hard time . I think its very likely we will have waves of people trying to leave north africa and its very likely the people on this thread will have their way and millions will settle in europe very likely you will have wars then . the whole picture is very bleak I see the sort of migrations you had at the end of the roman empire people looking for safety and land , in a hundred years time you may have the uk inhabited by mongols from central asia that was the sort of transfers of population you saw after the fall of rome
We are not going self sufficient. We'll stick to importing a large proportion of our food. Half your estimate to 100 million and that instantly reduces demand. Reduce it further to 70 million and it becomes even more feasible. Heck, perhaps we could be more self suffficient with this lower estimate. Byt, again, we won't be self sufficient. The bonds of trade are not going to come crashing down, unless migration watch or the BNP come into power...which is unlikely. *shakes head in shame* The future holds eco towns, greater reliance on alternative energies. Wich as long as the nimby's don't completely screw it all up with more opposition, will be a blessing. The modern home or one built in the near future will be upto 30% more efficient, that will mean more houses can be built, while using similar amounts of energy that would have been used for fewer houses. Is it possible to have a war with environmental refugees? And ? So what?
we wont be importing food because its unlikely there will be many exporters and what will we be able to pay for imports with without cheap fossil fuels . the countrys that export food today do it with huge amounts of cheap fossil fuels . and yes its possible to have a war with enviromental refugees especially if you let them settle in southern europe again read up about the waves of barbarians at the end of the roman empire , and if you shake your head in shame at my "I dont think we have some sort of duty to allow millions of people to enter europe or the uk even if those people are starving or poor " statement you need to put your money where your mouth is , you know that there are very poor people in the world are you personally living in a cardboard box on gruel and giving your income to the worlds poor if your not your bogus and fake . and so what , I think your way of thinking is outdated and comes from a time of cheap almost free energy. before fossil fuels what sort of world did we live in hmmm serfdom and human slavery , I think we are going back to a much poorer state and I really dont think people will be keen on making themselves poorer still
We will, but just not the same amount. It depends what time period we are talking about though. I'm only really talking about the next 20-50 years. After that, god only knows... Perhaps a continuance of: Partial solar powered freighter ship sets sail from Japan I have. They were not environmental refugees. No, I don't live in a cardboard box...why should I? I give a % of my income to various charities that help poor people all over the world...including here. Perhaps more of a % most governments can't even manage (0.7% of GNP). I'm probably looking at the short/medium term. I too can envisage a point in time where we have to radically alter the way we deal with our issues. But, as we are only really talking about the next few decades...5 decades at the most (when our population is supposedly readching 70 million). I don't think my thinking is that outdated.
