The Moon Landings Were A Hoax!!:

Watch some of the videos about it being a hoax on you tube and Google video. Its fucking ridiculous how sloppy NASA is.

The Moon landing WAS a hoax. However that does not mean we have not been there or are not currently there doing a bunch of (not so) funny business....

 

Watch some of the videos about it being a hoax on you tube and Google video. Its fucking ridiculous how sloppy NASA is.

The Moon landing WAS a hoax. However that does not mean we have not been there or are not currently there doing a bunch of (not so) funny business....

 

Well, there you go. That definitely proves it. It's on YouTube!

 

Some of you people can be so god damned retarded.

Thank your teachers and parents for doing such a great job with you......

 

What part of the moon landing video is sloppy. Maybe when you consider that it was made in 1969 before modern video cameras, you can understand why it was sloppy.

 

Perhaps if you look through the telescope you could see clearly.

Watch some of the vids I will post some links if I must. Although I think you can find em on your own.

 

Telescopes (including Hubble) do not have the resolution to see the Apollo landing sites. Someday the sites will be imaged but the non believes will STILL be too damn retarded to believe we did it. FUCK EM.

We went, we landed, we walked on it, now get over it.

 

I know we have been on the moon. But the Apollo missions are a hoax. Its obvious to see if you look at the footage of the landings and the photographs. Do a little research, look through the telescope(not literally).

First clue. Double the speed of any apollo moon landing video.

Also think about theater, plays like peter pan and how they make people fly.

 

They're not a hoax, seriously... find another conspiracy theory that makes some sort of sense. All of the reasons in this thread so far don't hold up to scrutiny.

 

Thats cool. I have seen otherwise. I am glad you believe what you have been told.

 

Go thank your teachers and parents for doing such a great job with you....

So sad........you are clueless.....

 

I'm glad you believe in a conspiracy most people never even thought about until FOX aired it, kudos man

 

There were MAYBE 6 people that believed we never went before FOX, now there are 9! ROTFLAMO!

THOUSANDS upon THOUSANDS of people worked on Apollo (including my uncle who worked on the LEM) and all of them were apparently in on the hoax! LOL!

These conspiratards(tm) crack me up!

 

If the vast majority believe it to be true, I'm going to believe it's false-- otherwise, what would make me special? Whichever way the herd is going, I'll go the opposite way. Because that makes sense.

 

To an idiot.......sorry, had to be said......

 

No, man...I agree with you.

I have no idea whether or not it happened. I just don't care. It wouldn't change my life one little bit either way. I can't imagine it being this important for anyone-- except for the fact that some people just insist on running the other way on things.

 

If thats what make you feel better about yourself then that is great.

This idea was thought of 2 years after the Apollo missions stopped. So fox didn't start the theory, although you are right that most people had not heard of it until fox decided to air a show about it for ratings.

Even Wikipedia has a picture of a 'mockup' Apollo mission in the studio they did this shit in.

 

Anyone that uses Wikipedia for facts is a friggin' idiot. Fact. ANYONE can edit Wikipedia data. ANYONE.

You fail again.

 

How is it not a hoax? Prove me wrong.

-the astronauts were held up by stage cables you are able to see.
-the less gravity effect was created by slowing the video down by 50%
-they reused the same set for places that were supposed to be miles apart on the moon.

otherwise it seems you are just in this for the argument and nothing more. So enjoy yourself.

 

wikipedia is great for facts, look up water...go on look it up! Oh wait you're the type that will say its all bullshit because Dr. Masaru Emoto's work is not adequately appreciated in the article