I'd say males are "dealt with" with the homosexuality clause and women are "dealt with" with the bit about prostitutes. So, both male and females are in trouble if they "deviate." But I just found this: The word ("arsenokoitai") appears in 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 and 1 Timothy 1:9-10. Many think it just means homosexual men. If this is the case then the arguments presented above about the passage in Romans still apply here. However, some scholars, notably the late Professor John Boswell of Yale University, have said that the word refers to sacred prostitutes. These would have been young men who worked in the temples of the fertility gods popular in the ancient world. Their function was to play the part of the god whilst the worshipper/client had sex with them. This was supposed to ensure a good harvest and was seen as a form of worship! Obviously Paul would not recommend such interesting worship services to those who were committed to following the life and example of Jesus. God, it is complicated nonsense isn't it.
Well, it's really hard to explain since everyone in here finds ideas that do not go along with the status quo to be kooky conspiracy theories. All I will say is that there are people in control who want to bring down society so they can remold it according to their plan. They do this by promoting things that destroy people's concept of normalcy. If you want to see the breakdown of a culture, you promote things that are in opposition to that culture.
I now understand your intent The first part is a conversation I had with odon already a few days ago I fully understand
everbody should be able to do whatever with whoever and whenever they feel like doing it. law against gay marriges is sexism. and it is another downfall of mankind.
I'm cool with your theories as long as they are honest opinions you hold. Just before you left for a while, I noticed you seemed to say these theories with a grin on your face, almost like you were not serious. I think that is kinda deceitful if you then go on to mock people and pretty much call them dumb. But, what ever, if you articulate them well, leave Jews out of it...I say go tell it on the mountain. I'd like to hear your theory.
it does say that gay who are guy make God mad in the first quote... but does not say it's a sin and they are going to hell. what I hate about these arguments is that is it part of a story. From what I see it's a snip it of a story, yea, so the guys it's referring to ended up being hate filled, 'unworthy' fags... it says nothing about the fact they were awful because they were fags, it says they were awful due to all of the above.
Obviously there were passages before that one as it starts in the twenties instead of with one If you match the list of traits below to the ten commandments you will find that these traits stand against almost every commandment that you said mentioned nothing against homosexuality
it's all whatever. who honestly cares what you do in the comfort of your own home? I could care less about who is fucking who and who is in love with who... I think people need to adopt more of a "I do me" attitude, and stop giving a shit about everyone else.
the government doesn't give a fuck they're playing keep-away with religious loons for votes. they need to create artificial distinctions for the sake of dividing the electorate, so they can get elected without actually having real knowledge or opinions, or skills. "marriage" is a religious concept Civil unions are a civil concept if they can find someone to marry them, fine, I don't give a fuck, but EVERYONE who is married is civilly joined not everyone who is civilly joined need be married.
it may be, but it shouldn't be. the cleanest way to ACTUALLY solve this problem is as I have outlined. re-read the first part of my post. no one in the government (except MINOR politicians from bumfuck egypt) give a fuck about gay marriage as gay marriage. it's a hackysack just like any other "issue" KEEP-AWAY!
If the majority of the gay "community" gave a fuck, this all would have been sorted long ago. Not saying there are guys/girls that arent millitant about it, just most of the hobbnob about this issue comes from straight people talking for us. The real big dealio is worrying about how adopted / ivf little Johnny or Sally gets treated at school cos they have two mommies or daddies. And the real issue there again is the collective nonsense of the straight community, not really us
I had a friend in elementary school who had two mommies, he pretty much kept it quiet, and was super popular. so it's not an issue unless kids are looking for something to treat your kid like shit about anyway. or you live in arkansas.