True, but I've barely got going. And you have not refuted my assertion that there are no respected journalists who agree with you. No, I haven't watched it yet. Maybe I will.
What are "respected journalists"? They're shills the media tells you are "respected" and people believe it. Operation Mockingbird's Walter Cronkite was considered a "respected journalist," too, and some of us know the role he served in brainwashing the masses. These people are given hero-like status so the public will find them more believable.
Fascism is a radical, authoritarian nationalist ideology that aims to create a single-party state with a government led by a dictator who seeks national unity and development by requiring individuals to subordinate self-interest to the collective interest of the nation.. Socialism refers to a broad set of economic theories of social organization advocating public or state ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, and a society characterized by equality for all individuals, with a fair or egalitarian method of compensation. I was wrong, he's a fascist prick not a socialist prick.. Peace
i could care less who agrees his actions speak for themselves and they are by definition fascist. i dont have a tv, and i dont subscribe to news papers. while i do keep up with current events,probably more than most americans through various news sources both main stream and alternative i do not let them dictate what i should think. once again simply because the media doesnt say he is doesnt mean he is not. FWIW, i believe both lou dobbs and glenn beck have equated obama with fascism but im sure your wanting someone from the washington post before you will call them legit.. my point is i dont consider any of them 100% legitimate. they all have their agenda. that is why i base my belief on the facts of his actions not what im told to think. just admit it,youve got nothing except that you have not yet been told by the boob tube that he is a fascist therefore by default in your mind he is not.. i mean that is your arguement right?
Fascism and socialism go hand-in-hand. Socialism is fascism and vice-versa. Why? Because the outcomes are exactly the same. It's just that socialism is controlled by bureaucrats, while fascism is controlled by corporations. Today we have both working in concert with one another. Look at Hitler. He was a socialist-fascist.
I think your logic is wasted here, but it should be a good show. :lurk5: Don't worry, I'll see to it that your body is returned to your relatives after RT gets through with you.
How am I clueless? If you were able to explain how, you would have. All these isms serve to confuse people. Socialism = consolidation of state power Fascism = consolidation of state power End result = tyrannical control over the people. The only difference is that socialism works slower and more incrementally to achieve its goals. How are these any different? They're just names. I think you are the one that is clueless. Most people will argue all day over how fascism and communism are at opposite ends of the spectrum, when they both entail essentially the same thing and have the same outcome, which entails endless suffering and enslavement.
Tyrannical control? I've experienced that when Republicans tell me I can't visit a hooker, perform oral sex, gamble on the internet, and smoke pot. Democrats are awful, too, but it's stuff that doesn't bother me so much, like forcing me to wear a seat belt. I don't see any tyrannical control coming from Obama. That's just a far-right fantasy.
who said anything about tyranny? why is there a need to use tyranny to install fascism when you have a apathetic brainwashed public? i dont think you understand the definition of economic fascism.
i guess they indeed are same as socialism and fascism are ultimately the same.. it boggles my mind that someone can look at what has been done in the last six months and what is proposed in the future and not equate it with fascism.. this country is doomed..