Part I; interconnection on both quantum-molecular and subuniversal levels. This is written partly for discussion and debate and partly for personal understanding. I will let alone how much each part weighs. As the world moves we are surrounded by a nearly infinite amount of actions, reactions and processes. A small percentage of them make up for the largest changes in every single entity, be it living or non-living. The logical first question is: what makes the most profound changes for the world as a whole. Is it on molecular level or on subuniversal level? I will first let everyone discuss and debate and propose my answer in due time. - P.M. Starken-DeWitt, Chief Advisor for 'Science Made Easy' magazine and Head of Molecular Processing at Whitford University.
I am going to say both, I believe the actions and reactions on both levels create what we see... Taking sides is like saying science and religion can not exist... I think it can, and does.
i think the subuniversal force somewhat dictates the molecular. every cause and effect that is purely cirumstantial and seemingly without purpose i think is driven by some cosmic force. however i think everything can be broken down scientifically
thats a damn good question. i dont know why i think that.maybe it makes more sense that large things are merely built up out of very small things
Very interesting question! The first i must pose, in response, is: Are they seperate? Or one in the same?
Bird of all people I would have thought you'd know the true answer to this question....that being that Allah grants us existence and is therefore the single most influential "thing" in existence as we know it. All jokes aside, the molecular is generally what we have empirically concluded constitutes the known universe. Granted there's much more to the molecular than simply a label, but we could go on about quantum mechanics for hours... So far as our existence is concerned organic compounds, which would fall under the base category of "molecular" play a rather large role, in the whole universe. Carbon is rather abundant, but hydrogen, helium and oxygen are even more common to existence. Those are all based on the molecular scale of measurement as well, chemical compounds being hugely influential if not the main influence in our universe. I'm not all too familiar with the concepts of "dark" energy and matter, and at this point they are more theory than anything....but still there's just so much more that we do not know than that which we think we do that it's hard to take a legitimate (un-biased)/conclusive stance in regards to this question you pose.....