The analysis of mind, matter, and thought

Discussion in 'Philosophy and Religion' started by lunarverse, Jul 20, 2009.

  1. lunarverse

    lunarverse The Living End

    Messages:
    13,341
    Likes Received:
    46
    Just wanted to know what people’s thoughts and answers are on this subject. Reading about it is easy enough, but understanding and applying it is a little difficult without ‘bouncing’ it off others.

    “Few things are more firmly established in popular philosophy than the distinction between mind and matter. Those who are not professional metaphysicians are willing to confess that they do not know what mind actually is, or how matter is constituted; but they remain convinced that there is an impassable gulf between the two, and that both belong to what actually exists in the world.”

    - The Analysis of Mind, by Bertrand Russell


    Do you think mind and matter come from the same source or not? How is it possible that they come from the same source (which is my understanding) yet there's a huge gap between the two? Would they not essentially be the same thing, or at least consist of the same thing?

    The essence of everything mental is considered ‘consciousness’ either as a relation to objects or as a quality of physical phenomena. Matter is part of consciousness therefore, based on this theory matter would be mental, or created by the mind. This would mean matter is created by thought. Does mind create thought or does thought create mind? Do you think matter could be created by one beings thought’s, or does everyone/everything have to be consciously and/or unconsciously aware of an object or thing in order for it to exist/ become matter? I’ve recently read about Carus and how he formulated the concept of the ‘unconscious’ and Kant’s writing on the “immeasurable field of obscure ideas” but had a hard time finding answers for these questions. Any thoughts or answers on anything above would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Peace
     
  2. neodude1212

    neodude1212 Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,724
    Likes Received:
    120
    ^ all mind.
    a mirror reflecting a mirror
    - shatter them
     
  3. lunarverse

    lunarverse The Living End

    Messages:
    13,341
    Likes Received:
    46
    do you really believe that? I've often thought that too. Makes sense
     
  4. neodude1212

    neodude1212 Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,724
    Likes Received:
    120

    believe?
    who would be the one believing?
     
  5. ChangeHappens

    ChangeHappens Member

    Messages:
    478
    Likes Received:
    1
    Mind is a part of matter. When something is a part of something else, it will change as the other changes. Ie. If you take out the cocoa from a chocolate bar, it will not be a chocolate bar anymore, the 'chocolate bar' will change into a different thing.

    Within this logic also lies reason to say that matter and mind are inter changeable or the same thing, in so far as you can alter one with the other and the other with the one. Ie. If you see something that threatens you, you can either physically get rid and resolve the feeling of 'threatened'. Similarly you can achieve the same result through a thought, by changing the mind you can also resolve the feeling of 'threatened'.

    The big difficulty I find with asking these questions is that it does little good towards many of the problems we face. Ok sure, everything is one thing - but what if believing this causes you more pain than it does pleasure you. Essentially, where do we benefit from making distinctions and where do these distinctions fail us. Definitely, everything seems to be the same, but I want to eat tomorrow and years later. I have to make a distinction then, in order to achieve this and even though this distinction is arbitrary in the ultimate sense, it has ultimate merit in so far as food is quite the ultimate pleasure.

    Life is like this game and shit. Its an adventure and a jail. Its also whatever suits your ultimate pleasure. Its also...It, itself but I want to eat and fuck, so...it isnt.
     
  6. lunarverse

    lunarverse The Living End

    Messages:
    13,341
    Likes Received:
    46
    Thanks for the great answer.
     
  7. MeAgain

    MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

    Messages:
    21,352
    Likes Received:
    15,629
    When the senses have nothing to perceive, there is no object containing any sensory or intellectual attributes. Objects rely on the senses.
    This does not mean that nothing exists unless it's perceived, just that primordial existence can not appear as separate independent objects without sensory discrimination.
     
  8. ChangeHappens

    ChangeHappens Member

    Messages:
    478
    Likes Received:
    1
    Yeah it might benefit you to think that way of me.

    I was also reviewing that answer and realized that you can alter mind through matter, in the traditional sense, by inducing a drug. Equally through mind itself you can alter matter, in so far as your perspective, a mental faculty, largely affects how the induced drug alters the brain.
     
  9. Hoatzin

    Hoatzin Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,697
    Likes Received:
    0
    Self-examination is the worst kind.
     
  10. standingseated

    standingseated A Back Scrubber

    Messages:
    945
    Likes Received:
    24
    Yeah, I'm really impressed with your responses in this thread, ChangeHappens. I agree.
     
  11. Any Color You Like

    Any Color You Like Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,147
    Likes Received:
    3
    There's no huge gap between mind and matter. Mind is only matter in a very complex form (at least complex beyond our understanding).

    Matter can alter mind, in fact the mind is matter altering itself and/or altered by other matter.
     
  12. Lavoe

    Lavoe Member

    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    Self-examination is the only examination. Even when examining the outside world, you are only able to analyze your perception of it.

    As far as mind vs. matter; I consider them both to be pure energy, simply at opposite ends of the vibrational spectrum. They both cyclically presuppose and reconcile each other.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice