Simpleton physics always exposes the lie. The lie exists for the sake of simpleton physicists. Keeps 'em off the streets, so to speak. Gives 'em somepun t' do, y'know. Itz the ebil gubmentz. Easy shmeasy.
I'm sure it does look pretty weak, that being the purpose of the show. Loose Change makes the official story look weak, and for the same reason: they're both biased bullshit.
Yes, it is hard to find a good program that is not overly biased. I guess thankfully enough the internet is a bit harder to censor like television. That was a good point about the directed energy weapons. There are so many theories out there that some will believe the disinfo and make the rest of us look like lunatics.
What? You didn't even consider the mass of the part that fell, or that resistance is hardly a factor above a certain mass. If you passed physics, your teachers should be ashamed.
Any of the truthers on here have the integrity to click on this link and read what is written there? http://www.debunking911.com/index.html You think that the Loose Change people make the official story look weak? I'm sorry but I feel much more comfortable believing thoughtful looking professional scientists and engineers than raving, spittle-emitting, pimple faced, aspies. pic related: Apologies for any aspies that take offense to being compared to those tards.
Ahahahahahaha I seriously almost lost my juice out of my nose! That picture's fucking hilarious. Anyways, anyone that couldn't see clear holes in Loose Change (or Zeitgeist, though I suppose that's loosely related) is a definite tool, and really needs to learn to think about the things they are watching. However, there were parts that strengthened my doubt in the government's story, no matter how stupid other parts of it were - so I can understand what he was saying. Just for clarification, I no longer doubt the official story of the collapse - a friend showed me the ACTUAL physics calculations (rather than these simple [minded] ones) and the tops of the towers were coming down with thousands of megatons of force - the rest didn't stand a chance. I of course, have never made presumptions about the motives behind it, true or false. I just know there are numerous things that were really fishy - and that things like this are never as clean cut as we would expect.
=/ Sorry, I can't. I'm lazy, hate doing math (dyspraxic - I get two numbers mixed up and fuck up all the calculations and have to start all over), and failed to locate the file he gave me last time I brought this up. I just looked again - I can't find it. I don't even know which computer it's on =/ If I ever talk to him again, I'll definitely ask him if he still has it. This link is a good skim - but you'd have to have quite an interest in the subject to read it in full. It's been a while since I read it but it I remember it focuses on why the towers fell so quickly. I still wonder sometimes if there was a conspiracy from the inside - but it doesn't make too much sense to me that people assert that it was rigged to fall. I mean, really, 99% of us don't have the physics knowledge to really even make a fair judgment (I must admit I am definitely included in this group) - and it could've easily been a job from the inside WITHOUT having the towers rigged. And rigging the towers could only cause them trouble - it would've made much more sense to just attack something else or do a different type of attack. My psychology professor talked about this in class once, and he asserted that it's a defense mechanism, that people can't believe that they, their buildings, and their country are that vulnerable to attack - but I thought that was funny, cause I find myself constantly wondering why, with all the hatred towards us, we aren't attacked more.
There is an extensive passionate counter movement to those flakes because it is a very sensitive subject to most sane Americans. Walk into a British pub and loudly say the London train bombings were an inside job and there were no real terrorists. Then see how extensive the ass beating that you are about to receive is.
Something a lot of other countries don't understand about America is how hard the 60s hit the heart of American patriotism. We still love our country, but for many Americans it's more like sibling love than passionate love.
exactly, the only logical conclusion is that certain persons in the government knew about the/a attack. the "official story" is filled with half truths, which makes BSing easier. i came up with my own theory of how the towers were brought down a while ago that, to me, seems plausible.
You know people are so stupid I know this women that btiches and HATES bush the idiot didn't even know that we train Bin Laden back in the 70's....what an idiot........sorry for the randomness...
I've heard that explanation a bunch of times, usually linked to 'conspiracy theories' in general. It is, in my opinion, total bullshit. I would feel much safer if I didn't believe some of the 'conspiracy theories' that I do. It would be pretty nice to really think everything in the world was peachy and that everyone in power (official or not) had my best interest at heart. But when this is obviously not the case, I see nothing mentally-questionable about saying so. For the record, I make no reference to 9/11 here. I'm talking generally.
Some of the theories out there are good disinformation to make the rest of us look loony. The grassy knoll John lennon Curt Cobain 9/11 commision etc,etc,etc A Theory must be able to be tested to make it worth legitimate value as well as not to be biased toward one side or the other.
lol have you seen watchmen ? since i saw watchmen i fully believe JFK was shot from the grassy knoll.
Ignoring the preposterousness of that statement, what did Watchmen have to do with JFK? I can't recall any reference...
The comedian shot JFK from the grassy knoll, it was in the opening credits. it was fucking hilarious.