Need Male Opinions Please

No, that doesn't turn me on. I was just arguing with the notion that American society is becoming less prudish, more accepting of male nudity and gay sex. I don't see a lot of evidence for it.

 

not a male opinion (seeing as i haves the boobies, lol) but i think that homosexuality is evolutions way of getting us to stop breeding. that and fertility problems becoming more rampant. maybe some people are uncomfortable with the natural aspect of that. thats just my theory. i feel that love is the most important thing, and noone should ever dictate who or what it is ok to love ( how you express that love IS another matter, sheep and children sure dont need that sort of attention, you know?)

 

Well, OK, but evolution is never on the side of not breeding. That's the driving force of evolution.

 

Maybe it's not uncommon for men to not want to seem gay, because they want to be sure to appear masculine to the womenfolk. So they hate gays. Or it makes them question their own sexuality, so they wish the whole subject didn't even exist and blame the gays.

 

Your theory about evolution doesn't make sense. According the theory of evolution, if homosexuality were genetic it would be extremely uncommon: homosexuals very rarely reproduce. Evolution is not an intelligent force moving us in a specific direction, as you seem to imply, and it is certainly not capable of making traits more common unless they make organisms significantly more likely to reproduce, which homosexuality certainly does not do. The whole idea is kind of backwards.

That said, I have some reservations about evolutionary theory. I'm assuming it's true here for the sake of argument.

 

We are still evolving, though... So there is intelligence behind it, if we decide "let's all be homosexuals to stop populating". Which would be pretty dumb of us.

 

Sexual dimorphism is a reproductive strategy of the species, sexual orientation is a social currency, they are not the same. To a person heavily invested in body-orientation synchronicity, they have property to defend.

 

Thetaboo and naughtiness of sex and nudity ARE the bread and butter of the media and MOST religeous organizations, and they are BOTH big business entities that will do whatever they have to to keep the taboo and naughtiness alive and well to justify and sustain thier own existance;.

 

In the end, with anyone making a claim to their orientation, fidelity, likes or dislikes, all you really have is their word

Just cos they say they are 100% straight or 100% Gay, doesnt make it true

 

That is correct, the answer I give to one person may be entirely different to another person depending on who it is and what influence they have in my life as well as any benefits or repercussions. I would not consider myself a liar if such a highly personal question was asked and am not comfortable with that person knowing the real truth. There are many reasons why people who enjoy alternative lifestyles do not wish to '' come out '' and be open to the world. I guess if you are full on gay it would be easier to '' come out '' to be able to live every day activities like a heterol couple in the open. If you are basically straight and have a sexual interest in both sexes and are surrounded by family and friends who are very very straight then you would be in that group that I described above. And just to clarify, I,m not suggesting that a gay coming out is easy, I,m just saying it would be harder to try and hide that kind of relationship because it involves way more than just casual sex.

 

religion...enough said....

but historically family units have been necessary to encourage offspring which are necessary to support the parents when they get older, so that is what was encouraged by the churches

 

People are afraid of what is different.

And that guy with the beard and the cloak, chillin' up in the clouds somewhere. Anyone who fraternizes with a poof gets cattle-prodded by the big man up top and sent downstairs to pray for their deliverance in the pits of fake hell.

 

I agree with most people who have posted. Some people think they have all the answers. They think that things should go like this, and that. They don't realize people have their own will, and rights. They can decide for themselves and don't need someone to push their "way of life" upon to them. I find it really disturbing anyone could "frown" up on homosexuality. Who is anyone to to have the nerve to speak out against it?

 

a few night ago i was watching tv with a couple of my buddies and this gay hotilne afvertisemtn came on. i instantly became very uncomfortable and i could tell it was the same for everyone in the room.

i have noting against gay men and i pretty sure my friends had noting against them either, but it is a very uncomfortable subject for alot of men to talk about so we just put in in the dark!!!!!

 

"We fear change"

 

Typo or Fruedian slip ??

 

:smilielol5:Actually I don't think they EVER reproduce, at least not with each other through homosexual sex.

 

I don't really have a problem with homosexuality. Just don't try and tell me it's "natural".
If it were natural then the sexual union between two persons could and would result in the procreation of the species.
Homosexuality is counter productive as far as the natural purpose of sex.
Simple, matter of a fact, law of nature. End of discussion, Homosexuality isn't normal in a strictly biological definition, as well as the definition of normal.
If it were the species would eventually die out.

Emotional and psychological needs and motives are another thing altogether.
I don't even want to touch that topic with a ten foot strap-on!

 

That's actually not true.

Female eggs can be fashioned into sperm by scientists now. Therefore, homosexual women can and do reproduce.

 

Petri dish sex don't count.
Don't believe it, post a link that I can research please.