Is love and sex are the same things?

hi,
Is love and sex are the same things?
what will a women do if she knew that after marriage that her husband is gay.
will she spend time with him and compromise for love . and leave sex .
azizullah98@yahoo.com

i have a deep mind.

 

i think they r the same thing....
but, not absolutely
for instance i love my direct family but not sexually, obviously
for anyone else, yea, but maybe not, no absolutes

 

Sex is two bodies cooperating to share pleasure and perhaps create life.

Love is everything that you do for and with your lover, including sex.

 

She might leave him because he decieved her, but not because of the sex, she's a woman.

 

I don't understand your question fully...

Sex is an action, love is a feeling.
Making love is sex, an action.

Why would they be the same thing?
They coexist sometimes, but you can have sex without love, and vise versa.

 

They are not the same thing and you can most certainly have 1 without the other. People practice love without sex all the time. Most certainly sex while in love is thought to be a much greater experience. Again, many people have sex without love. Some people cannot see themselves having sex unless they are in love, some just don't care. I can turn off either. I learned a long time ago to be able to enjoy sex with someone I do not love. I have also learned that I can fall in love with a woman and the sex becomes even more amazing... It is a person to person thing.

 

hi

I think love have big scope.and sex is one of the ingredient from the topic of love. m i right?
azizullah98@yahoo.com

 

Most people new to love and sex get the two mixed up. Until you experience them them both in one relationship you won't fully understand it, or at least most likely won't. It happens differently for everyone.

 

Absolutely. They are one and the same.

 

Please explain. I don't understand your reasoning. To me it means that I could go have sex with a strange woman and I would love them... That doesn't make since to me.

 

Have you heard of Dr. Strangelove? :cheers2:

 

Nope not at all.

 

Love and sex are not the same thing.

Love is a putting your partner needs above your needs. Love never gives up. Love is faithfulness. Love is action. Love is kindness. True love lasts forever.

Love is not a feeling. Feelings change. True Love is stead fast and steady.

Sex without love is just lust.

Heavy duty or BS - but that's what I think.

ok...now onto this...

Boot his ass to the curb. And get tested for AIDS. And get a good lawyer. This is a perfect example of what love isn't. He's an idiot for getting married. And she's a fool for not knowing. Both sides lose here.

Ok...onto something less serious!

 

no sirs and ma'ams it definitly is not the same, that is for sure my opinion. But i'll take either one, although i'm a hopeless romantic.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1KvgtEnABY

 

Okay... that had nothing to do with love vs sex.

 

hi
yes i think sex is not love.
but who can not m,ake sex he can not make the feeling of love with women like gay people who can not fuck .
do u agree with me

azizullah98@yahoo.com

 

I think it's a yes and no type thing. Sex can be a great and essentially a natural way to express one's love for another. But at the same time, one does not NEED to have sex to express one's love.

I think it all depends on each couple whether or not their marriage would last just because one party is gay. It all depends on how important the sexual aspect of their marriage is to that particular couple. Some couples feel sex is an important aspect of their relationship, which is perfectly fine, while some may feel sex to be rather unimportant, which is fine, too. Whatever works for that couple.

However, I DO believe denying/ignoring one's own sexuality to be potentially harmful in various ways. I personally believe that we all need to be sexually happy. If this couple you're speaking of is not sexually happy, then that is one more thing for them to be stressed about. Perhaps they could exercise an open relationship where they could both fulfill their sexual needs but separately, if they still want to stay in their marriage.

Just my opinion...

 

Not at all. It's like peanut butter and jelly, they're two completely different things and are awesome alone, but together BOOM awesomeness. They get grouped together a lot but are also 2 completely different and wonderful things on their own. You can most definitely have sex without being in love whatsoever with the other person. You can do it just for the fun/pleasure of it, with or without feelings involved. Some people can't have sex without feelings, but those feelings aren't always love. Sometimes it's just neediness or whatever. And you can be in love and not have sex obviously whether because you're waiting till you get married, or don't like sex, or can't physically have sex or whatever. They go perfectly together just like pb&j but they're both beautiful separate and one does not need the other to exist.

 

They aren't the same thing. Sex can be an expression of love, but love is not sex.

Sex can be passionate and a way in which to show affection for one another, but that in of itself is not love. Love is the willingness to sacrifice ones life for another. To be there for the good and bad. Love is beyond sex because much of sex can be guided by lust and lust is not sex. People often times confuse the two.

Love is love. Circular? No, just pure and perfect and inexpressible.

If sex were love then explain the type of relationship Christopher Reeves and his wife had. I doubt they had any sex after the accident. That is love. The agreement between two people to be with each other until death do they part. If that is forever, then that is what it shall be.

It should not be, "I am trying my best to love you." It should be, "I can't help but to love you." - Alan Watts.