1. The Hipforums announces it first ever fundraiser. After nearly 30 years online, we must ask our members and guests to help support the website. Thanks to years of ongoing financial support of our members, advertisers and volunteer admin staff, we have been able to keep the forums alive.

    Now we must ask for help as available funds have all been used for our Internet server and other fees.

    So please donate any amount to our PayPal account donate@Hipforum.com to keep the site going. If we can get enough for a few months fees, we won't need to nag you again!

    You could also subscribe to the forums and get an upgrade to Supporter or Lifetime Supporter here

    You can dismiss this message by clicking on the X in the upper right corner.

    Thanks! The Hipforums Staff
    Dismiss Notice

Greatest General (Military leader)

Discussion in 'History' started by bthizle1, Aug 3, 2009.

  1. Geprodis

    Geprodis Member

    Messages:
    0
    Likes Received:
    1
    Hannibal has to be on any top 5 list imho because he kept winning battles against the Romans who were already badasses by that time. They had every conventional advantage over the Carthaginians and Hannibal just kept out-smarting them. He didn't stop Rome from becoming a superpower, but he did prove his military genius.
     
  2. Hooliday

    Hooliday Member

    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    There's plenty. Probably by just pure logic Alexander the Great would always come out on top. But if you have to go more for your "taste" of military leader I would probably pick people like Julius Caesar, Hannibal, Von Rundstedt, Joan of arc, Napoleon. Even Leonidas of the ancient Spartans.

    This really all comes down to attributes you wish to see in a military leader. Personal courage, strategic intelligence, ambition.

    Just for example, Zhukov was easily one of the best known generals in World War 2, but his experience and knowledge was paid with blood of millions of Russians. When you back ancient times, you didn't have the luxury of second chances. You went in as victor or came out toast. Look at Cannae, Alesia and dozens of other ancient battles. There was no way out, nothing but death or complete victory. Perhaps this is a subject that really has no right answer.
     
  3. TheMadcapSyd

    TheMadcapSyd Titanic's captain, yo!

    Messages:
    11,392
    Likes Received:
    21
    Ditto, the desert fucking fox himself
    [​IMG]


    As a strategist it's more debatable, but as a tactician he can't be beat. That on top of the chivalry he displayed.

    "We have a very daring and skillful opponent against us, and, may I say across the havoc of war, a great general." - Churchill
     
  4. dirtydog

    dirtydog Banned

    Messages:
    1,892
    Likes Received:
    5
    I can't speak well of anyone that would order me into a trench. Wars will cease when men refuse to fight.
    [​IMG]
     
  5. TheMadcapSyd

    TheMadcapSyd Titanic's captain, yo!

    Messages:
    11,392
    Likes Received:
    21
    I doubt most of these men took any pleasure in having to send men into either battle either, but their abilities should be respected.
     
  6. Staples29

    Staples29 Member

    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    0
    General Robert E. Lee - My personal opinion because he was outnumbered and out-supplied yet he still fought and won many battles, My second would be William Tcumseh Sherman and than Ulysses Grant.

    I find the American Civil war very interesting and I think the Generals of that war suffered alot.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice