stoner = lazy burnout steriotype.. It's true a lot of the time, but what people don't get is that weed doesn't turn people into lazy burnouts, lazy burnouts are just more prone to smoking lots of weed. lol... And as for the whole rugor post.. I'm 80% sure you're trolling, but just in case you're actualy that big of a dumbass, Nam freaked the vets out because they were killing people, watching their friends die around them, and seeing screaming children burned alive by napalm, not because they were doing this... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlTOPjcyQLs"]YouTube - That 70's show best scene ever Edit: and pizza guy is the best stoner job. I think president of the united states comes in second..
Sorry your wrong. weed is a psychedelic! I never said it was the pot that made vietnam vetrans crazy? you are not sure what I am trying to get at? why did you say that? this thread was about ideal stoner jobs. so I said a chill stoner job is doing yardwork. again I never said veitnam vetrans are crazy because of weed? I simply said it enhances the negative emotions they feel! without pot they will still feel negative emotions. but smoking pot to help zone those emotions out is simply worsening them. Yes, weed has nothing to do with a person or their intelligence. A weed smoker can do just as much as a normal person. There is no difference between a pot smoker and non-pot smoker. It's all based on personal ambitions. Yeah I know plenty of pot heads who have families and high paying business jobs. when did I say I have family issues? I said IF YOU DO then smoking pot may not be healthy! personally I think my family is great.
Very nice post man. I totally agree with what you say. basically what you just said is what I was trying to say about pot. most of the people who quoted me completely did not understand what I was trying to say.
Chill stoner jobs is. Painting, yardwork, pizza delivery, door to door salesman, hand wash car washer, fast food cook, valet parking, janitor, security, and those people at water parks that tell people when to enter the water slide.
The thing about situational conditioning is that it can also be situationally conditioned out of you too.... What made you impressionable in the first place still exists.. MDMA and LSD have also been used (experimentally) in conjunction with social or environmental exercises to treat PTSD and anxiety disorders.. It could be speculated that pot or alcohol could be used to the same end (just with slower results) I'm open-minded to your perspective and agree that pot smokers can be passionate about debates involving the harmful affects of marijuana.. However that doesn't make them wrong by default... The simple fact is that pot is far less harmful than most toxins you may come in contact with regularly.. Marijuana has not been shown to produce any lasting damage.. Even situational conditioning is situational... If pot triggers a bad reaction, quitting pot will eliminate the trigger, within a matter of months your body will have completely recovered from your earlier pot use..
dude imagine if the government did an experiment with a child from the time it was born. Like using LSD and drugs and stuff to slowly condition it's developing mind.
I don't think enough consideration could be given to every aspect of emotional and psychological development to have any sort of measurable success.. Starting with developed people gives a measurable baseline..
Every job ive worked i could smoke weed because once you in, and play it right, you are fine. Unless you working for the government wearing a blue suit. If you can pass a drug test and not be a fool during work, any job can be a stoner job.
psychoactive drug-A psychoactive drug, psychopharmaceutical or psychotropic is a chemical substance that crosses the blood-brain barrier and acts primarily upon the central nervous system where it alters brain function, resulting in changes in perception, mood, consciousness, cognition, and behavior. These drugs may be used recreationally, to purposefully alter one's consciousness, as entheogens for ritual or spiritual purposes, as a tool for studying or augmenting the mind, or therapeutically as medication. psychedelic-The term psychedelic is derived from the Greek words ψυχή (psyche, "soul") and δηλοῦν (deloun, "to manifest"), translating to "mind-manifesting". A psychedelic experience is characterized by the perception of aspects of one's mind previously unknown, or by the creative exuberance of the mind liberated from its ostensibly ordinary fetters. Psychedelic states are an array of experiences elicited by various techniques, including sensory stimulation, sensory deprivation as well as by psychedelic substances. Such experiences include hallucinations, changes of perception, synesthesia, altered states of awareness, mystical states, and occasionally states resembling psychosis. i have never hallucinated while i was stoned.
Tried to rep you for this, but wouldn't let me But thanks for posting REAL information with scientifically backed proof and not some scatter-brained inconsistent, half-assed opinions based on urban legend
According to my high school psychology book, there hasn't been a single long-term effect of marijuana use that researchers have been able to prove yet. It also verifies that the number of marijuana-related deaths each year is zero. I was surprised that a high school book would actually admit to all of this. And weed is in fact a psychedelic, guys. Sorry. I thought that was generally agreed upon by even stoners.
That's a mis classification from way back. Get with the times bro. And :rofl: at using a high school book as any sort of reference.
I guess my post's obvious overtone of surprise that the book contained any valid information about weed went right over your head. That's ok. lol Sorry "bro." I didn't know we were just here to circle jerk about how great and subtle weed is instead of actually consider the studies that claim it's a psychedelic. I'll leave you guys to finish up and eat the cookie in the middle. I've smoked six bowls today and I'm finding it hard to care.
which studies are those? edit: yknow what.. Fuck it. I don't actualy expect you to contribute any real evidence. This is what I found with a little bit of looking around, if anyone comes up with something else, cool. http://www.biologyreference.com/Po-Re/Psychoactive-Drugs.html
Haha indeed, I do not give enough of a shit to find you any real evidence. That shouldn't be my responsibility either since you're sitting at a computer with access to Google just like I am. How does the fact that it requires large doses to produce psychedelic effects make it any less true that it does indeed produce psychedelic effects?