Someone already pointed out that Labrador should be with the North and not with Quebec. Any other opinions/comments? Here's the second version:
I don't think that these should be countries, just that this is how culture is currently in North America.
I've been to both British Columbia and California, and they both acted the same way as well as having the same accents. Same culture, bro.
hhmm.. yes california needs to be split in two.. but maybe not how you have it split.. the line needs to be moved up some. or hell.. split it in 3! northern california :ssmokeit: farmerland california, :sunny: plastic disney water thieving california.. :mickey:
Hmm, I might do that. I divided it because I've heard that the population in Southern California are mostly Latin American, so I included it with the Latin American cultures.
Parts of the Midwest being grouped with New England and the Northeast is wrong. Missouri shouldn't be with the South. Also needs to be a distinction between the Midwest and the Rust Belt. Here's how I would do it (for the US at least)
Alright. I'm planning to do a second version, this time on an international scale. I'll be sure to include that.
neo! why would you lump california together with texas? i'm offended.. as i'm sure every texan is just as offended.. lol northern california would like to think of itself as part of oregon and washington.
Eastern Oregon and Washington should probably be with the mid-west, they're pretty conservative away from the coast. Same with California.
About your 2nd version, it's kind of nit-picky but the term "Deep South" is kind of a misnomer in the way you've used it, as not all of those states are actually considered the deep south. /pedantic