I for one am quite suspicious of Julian Assange. Just the way this whole ordeal has been handled, and Assange's martyr status raises several red flags for me. I am sure if Assange were for real, TPTB (the powers that be) would have him terminated immediately, and the simple fact that he was released from jail is highly suspect as well. If he were for real, he would have simply disappeared, never to be heard of again. So, it is fairly obvious to me that there is an agenda here, which I believe the ultimate goal of is to censor and control the internet, which is partly why I think Anonymous has risen in support of what Assange has done. While I can admire WHAT Assange has done, and why he SAID he did it, it is important not to lose sight of what other possible motives he may have had. Now apparently he has some cables pertaining to Israel, but is waiting for 6 months to release them. This SCREAMS manipulation. He had no qualms releasing the other cables, so why should he change the way he manipulates when it comes to Israel? I remember the flood of ZIO apologists very well. So are we going to let the Internet be taken from us?
Yes I am still waiting for real scandals to be released like on the Rothschilds, satanic rituals, food industry, pharma industry, mass media and so on
I for one am quite suspicious of those who go around making up conspiracies to attempt to discredit Julian. You had best let your handlers know that you overstepped your mandate and exposed yourself...
Firstly, I wasn't the one who "made up" this conspiracy. Secondly, judging by your signature, you are obviously biased, so maybe you are the one who should not be trolling my thread? This is a discussion, I am not trying to discredit anyone.
Did you enjoy it? Do you think other people... such as Julian, enjoy it when you and others do it to him?
But as for the discussion.... Okay let's discuss it. Contrary to your statement of; Let's look at what you said, shall we? This isn't YOUR theory? Someone else decided for you that you were suspicious of him? What about this next part, did someone else decide for you that your red flags should be raised? Was it someone else who was sure for you that if he was real, tptb would have terminated him? If it isn't your theory, and it isn't you who is trying to discredit Julian, just what does this next part mean. After all, it is fairly obvious to YOU... Not from the likes of you we aren't.... even when you try to claim that your stance, isn't your stance as if that somehow makes it okay.
How can you be sure that the story is authentic? There are so many Obama style gvt and secret service operations much bigger than that
I can't be, anymore then someone can be sure it isn't. Considering that this is the first thing that has motivated many people to actually wake up and look around, puts it in a positive light to me. As it is a public stand for the freedom of information, it seems like a good thing. As it is someone standing up for what they say in the face of the exact threats that the OP stated haven't happened, it tends to make me think it is. As for it leading to us somehow loosing the internet... that may be what some people will claim when it happens, but the truth will be the same as for why we are in this position in the first place... Because people allowed it to happen... in part, by threads like this one.
i don't like to give TPTB that much credit for pulling off such an intricate scheme, however i think there may be some merit to this whole idea. another idea is that some of the material wiki leaks has acquired was leaked on purpose so that TPTB could see where such information would turn up after being leaked in a manner of their choosing.
I am just wondering why the leaks dont publish any of the big atrocities, there is already enough of it on the web I know of. That would make people go on the streets and protest and do something. Like a 9/11 of information. Instead they just published stuff where people say o well this is unjust. They dont go on the street for that and take action. Why not showing any of the real crimes against humanity up to now? I saw nothing about pharma industry, food industry and so on...nothing on the genozide and destruction of our people...!
Well... if I were going to set people up, I would choose to leak documents that would give me a clear case of espionage or treason. Ones that are actually labeled as Top Secret or above... Not documents that provide no actual leverage in getting the people they flow through.
TPTB would not want to leak material that is labeled top secret and would be so damning. The idea is to leak small fish. So far, relatively small fish is the only thing wiki leaks has released. no big fish, just enough to get everyone's attention.
You peeps are forgetting that the first thing that Wikileaks published, supposedly from Bradley Manning, was the very incriminating video of the attack that killed two Reuters journalists. That would hardly seem to be something our gov't would want released. I think you conspiracy theorists try to connect dots to everything, but sometimes the dots are only in your imagination.
What do they gain from it? It won't lead to the restriction of the net. Or at least not the successful restriction.
I didnt say that the USG was responsible. Here is the article I quoted in the OP. http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2010/12/24/psyop-assange-updates/
Wikileaks has been operating for years now (2006). It didn't just begin with the release of the Apache Helicopter guncam footage. They've also released countless millions of whistleblower documents on countries from all over the planet covering every type of thing you can imagine. It was only when they started to really dig into the US did the Media in general start to pick up on them and the attacks on the organization have escalated since then. No credible proof of any kind, or even a rational argument has been put forward to support this silly claims that Wikileaks is some sort of psy-op. But you can trust the tinfoil hat brigade to run with this.
Here's another 'article' from the same blog... The strange and consequential case of Bradley Manning, Adrian Lamo and WikiLeaks To sum it up... The whole thing from the start, was a psy-op... It's intent? Apparently to discredit wikileaks... Of course... wikileaks is part of the conspiracy now... Excellent proof that having the ability to blog, does not relate to the ability to think critically.