How Would You Improve Society?

I would remind that the most basic courtesy we give to a stranger, is a most basic courtesy required at home as well. We sometimes use terms and methods with our "loved ones" that we would not dream of using on a stranger.

 

Demolish all fast food restaurants and build community gardens out of the rubble.

 

Free weed Thursdays

 

Have everyone live by one simple rule, do no harm.

 

not much


get rid of voting rights - majority of people are far too stupid to have that sort of power

mandatory prebeating of all children under the age of 5

 

Sustainable living that puts the human race back in harmony with the cyclical nature of the earth

I've always heard this but I don't believe its true. If you have an entire grow house within your house, then yeah your electric bill is going to suffer as a result, but growing one or two plants for personal consumption shouldn't use any more electricity than using a heat lamp because you have pet lizards.

 

http://www.hipforums.com/newforums/showthread.php?t=414112&highlight=police+electrical&f=615

That's just one case, there are more in Canada and the US.

 

wow, i always thought it was just an urban legend.

I still think the electricity needed for one plant wouldn't cause a big enough increase in the electric bill to warrant suspicion.

 

as a good anarchist I'd absorb it!

 

A small asteroid about 8-10 kilometers in diameter, ya know, like when you don't like the picture so you shake the etch-a-sketch and start over.

 

Double Post sry.

 

I would hope all what i say would be on a global scale not just the country i currently live in.

Force taxes to be fair and equal.

Take the homeless off the street and put them in homes.

Only 2 children allowed per family.

Make it illegal not to recycle.

Make cigrattes illegal

0.5% of your total earnings per year would go towards helping nature and
the environment.

Everyone in prison and jail for marijuana charges would be acquitted of all and set free. (this can depend though on the case)

All reality television would be banned.

Solar energy would be mandatory on all buildings.

Everyone working for the Government would have to be strapped to a lie detector during campaign runs.

The federal reserve would be abolished.

Cellphones would be banned, only direct lines from your house.

 

So it sounds like your solution is even greater control and suppression of personal freedoms and liberty.

 

A lot of what i said is for the good of the planet and our own civilization and to keep everyone honest.

Im not trying to turn into a dictator...

 

You say that now......
But after you get a little taste of the power..:devil:

 

Absolute power corrupts absolutely I know.

It would be nice not to live in a monetary world as well.

Then greed (I hope) would not exist.

I try to live and not bother anyone unless i needs some cooking ingredients lol. Then i drive my neighbors crazy..

 

Outlaw every philosophy, religion, or organisation that insists, alludes, or leads its members to believe they are somehow better than those outside of their narcissistic, Nazi-like in-group.

 

.

 

No it wouldn't, but what good is 1-3 plants for someone who smokes/uses a fair amount of cannabis?

 

[i am usually busy these days, however, on the occasion I have time to look at the forums, and see mistakes, I have to intervene from concious]

society is from the french société, which is a kind of corporation (a dead fiction). Société Générale is an example.

When the people who act as public agents, public officers (this includes reporters working for newspapers with a business license from the STATE OF..), publish 'Good for the society', they mean 'Good for the United States Federal Corporation (the parent trading corporation of STATE OF..), or [insert the regional Government corporation here, UK, IRELAND, etc],' and the interests of it's owner-controllers. (People who own-control the Fed/IMF).

The truth is 'society' is not us. We are private, living, and exercise our rights, by using them exclusively in the private, and when asked by an agent, or someone private who fraudulently believes and acts themselves to be a 'member of the public', we ask 'do I know you?', and if pressed: claiming what we do as private, at every opportunity. Instead of leaving it up to presumption, or being swindled into declaring to be: members of the public/voters/citizens/subjects/wards/insane/incompetent/humans/human beings/cattle/children/chattel property/freeman-on-the-land*

* a freeman was a kind of servant, who was attached to the land and owed a duty to their Lord. The copyrighted KJV/NIV has 'Praise the Lord' often enough to imprint this message. We want to be the lord, realize our true self is god itself, inseparable.
​

All of the titles with '///' above, are based on the same intent: a ward. A ward is a member of the family of mankind (male or female), who is not yet at the age of majority so they are presumed to need a guardian (those who work as the agents and officers). Police are an example.

The question is ... similar to many discussions of patri-ots, those with.. a claimed loyalty to the Patri (Pope).



The U.S. socéité, for those hipforum members on north america, isn't ours, and it isn't us. It's a trading corporation, a kind of corporation called a 'Federal Government'; whereas other types can be charities or for-profits. A Federal Government is a dead fictional entity with it's own rules for it's own adherents. Now you know why you never want to acquiesce to 'miranda rights', because you already have built-in rights, everything you do up to someone else's nose is a right; their Constitution and miranda enumerate only some of the rights, so when you claim 'Constitutional rights' or acquiesce to 'miranda rights' being read to you, you are claiming to be a ward who is not at the age of majority knowing one inherently has rights. A ward is incapable of knowing his inborn rights, and thus allows them to be 'awarded' through another man: thus construed as benefits. Which you then, as a ward, probably believe can be taken away by a man. Rights never go away from you by action of another man. If you are sentient, it might be enough to object to having some of your rights enumerated, and make sure the agent takes written note of your objection, as a last-ditch effort if you otherwise fail to keep your actions private.


If what has been written here is legible to you, somewhere up their food-chain, is someone who knows what you did by your loud and clear objection, with evidence. No consenting, unrestricted autograph- the kind of signature (mark) a ward is likely to give (John F Smith). You can give a mark, such as 'I do not consent', and you can hear the miranda being read if they roboticly insist; the key here is not arguing, but rather objecting as now, you might know, one doesn't need miranda. What you do is as important as what you say: arguing also equates you with being a ward.

The Lord doesn't argue with anyone. So it helps greatly if you can also demonstrate that you can reasonably self-govern - be the Lord. When one cannot self-govern- only how to be a crazy ward that argues, by openly declaring to be a voter, or a citizen (in the public jurisdiction) in conflict with public policy; this is why the people working for the pseudo-government (society), step-in. They probably - correctly - presume you need a guardian. Remember, they are going to determine what do by your actions as much as by what you say. Words alone are not enough. [It helps to know the whole 'equality' thing is a fraud (public): you are either a master, or a slave/servant/serving, in any situation (private, truth).]

Instead of changing someone else's society (corporation), or claiming to be a living vassal to a dead entity, surely a sign of insanity, learn who you are, and be your true god-self.

If one wants to try to change society, and acts against what the officers, owners and agents of that society have already decided is in the best interest of the society, one is seen as a terrorist; at the very least, a trespasser who is attempting to take what is not one's own.

The most important thing is knowing who you are as a living man or woman. You are not public, you are private. You cannot bring your inborn rights into the public; once you commingle by claiming to be a ward (see above examples), you are claiming rights are mere benefits, which can be then taken away by the public agent.

[another way to look at it is, once you claim to be a citizen, you are claiming to be an employee, and your employer can do whatever they want within their own guidelines; anything they determine is prudent and necessary]