Think I got fake "superrr pure" acid, help?

Discussion in 'LSD - Acid Trips' started by Runeika, Feb 5, 2011.

  1. guerillabedlam

    guerillabedlam _|=|-|=|_

    Messages:
    29,419
    Likes Received:
    6,305
    Lol the 2c series psychedelic effects are at a much much higher dose than the do(x) series.
     
  2. Neil101

    Neil101 Banned

    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    no really? dude i said it is unlikely, of coarse LOL READ, your the second person that fails to do so.
     
  3. upperlevel

    upperlevel Member

    Messages:
    721
    Likes Received:
    2
    Disagreement is something you do on a qualitative statement.
    Being right/wrong applies here because this is mostly quantitative.
    You are completely wrong about the max LSD on blotter being 90ug.
    And if you feel the effects of DoB on only very slightly thicker blotter paper that means it is an absolute minimum of 0.2mg of it on the blotter. I don't care what the LD50 of Dob is because that makes no sense why you would mention it. If you can fit 0.2mg of something on blotter, then you only need 10 of these blotter (not that big) to feel effects of LSA. You are getting a lot more than threshold effects of DOB on blotter though, so it would be substantially more than 0.2mg on the blotter, so you would need significantly less than 10 hits to feel the LSA.

    Lol you need to read and do some research. And read about the fact that in the hippy days some blotter had upwards of 300ug of lsd on them. That's still not the maximum weight that can fit on blotter of a substance.
     
  4. guerillabedlam

    guerillabedlam _|=|-|=|_

    Messages:
    29,419
    Likes Received:
    6,305
    I read it over again... I've come to the conclusion English is not your first language.
     
  5. Neil101

    Neil101 Banned

    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    now your really pissing me off, FUCKING READ I SAID ROUGHLY 90 UG, i NEVER SAID RIGHT ON THE NOSE. for fuck sakes get some common sense into you.
     
  6. upperlevel

    upperlevel Member

    Messages:
    721
    Likes Received:
    2
    Also saying someone is not telling the truth is aying that they are lying. For someone to lie, they are a liar. You are saying it is unlikely that floes is not a liar, that is almost basically just saying floes is.

    Either way, any amount of LSD on blotter, especially now, is not near the maximum they could put on.
     
  7. Neil101

    Neil101 Banned

    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    yes that's in the hippy days when they had less technology and not the availability of the internet yet. you don't think that people might say it's 300ug, because i HIGHLY doubt that a single 1/4 blotter of lsd had that much of LSD on it. think about it hard. that makes no sense at all. considering blotter found know a days don't well why such a big change? odd i thought theses do not change often within a 50 year bases? lets take weed well weed is know to be allot more potent to day when in fact it isn't it's just somebody putting propaganda out there wich is what ur Doing.
     
  8. upperlevel

    upperlevel Member

    Messages:
    721
    Likes Received:
    2
    I'm just going to say it. You are an idiot. LSD is diluted a certain amount before having blotter dipped in. This is to make a more standard and manageable dose per hit (some also do it to make more money). And I don't claim that a 1/4 of a blotter has 300ug either. Weed is alot different because we now have genetically chosen weed that is high in THC and lower in the counteractive, that has nothing to do with your point or mine.
     
  9. Neil101

    Neil101 Banned

    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    it has to do with my point that these, thing do not Change, it has been mentioned in large way say that the thc level of cannabis has gotten to high, i said these to say that drugs don't change acid is the say as 50 years ago the only difference is it being used by different generation, btw u don't have to dip it in, some soak it some drop Liquid lsd on it. it all depends on chemist or who ever is dealing with the liquid lsd. 1 hit of acid is 1/4 k. and i am talking per hit so per hit is per 1/4. so when u said 300 ug i thought u meant it on 1 hit, sorry for miss understanding but i am not going to argue with somebody that is stubborn i have read this all over, being the 3rd time tonight to read over lsd again, i am pretty sure i am right but, what ever, think want u want, because of coarse you know everything and u can judge me because u know me.
     
  10. guerillabedlam

    guerillabedlam _|=|-|=|_

    Messages:
    29,419
    Likes Received:
    6,305
    Salvia definitely got a shitton stronger in the past 10-15 years compared to when it first started being used by the psychedelic culture in the early 90's and by the natives before that.
     
  11. Neil101

    Neil101 Banned

    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    maybe extractw, but the salvorin A content in divinorum hasn't changed much, maybe a little from different types of the plant.
     
  12. guerillabedlam

    guerillabedlam _|=|-|=|_

    Messages:
    29,419
    Likes Received:
    6,305
    Extracts= drug changed

    We win, you lose! now shut up and be a little bit more tactful in the way you respond to some of the regulars.
     
  13. deleted

    deleted Visitor

    [​IMG]
    i know nothing ,,,, nothing,.......
     
  14. pr0ne420

    pr0ne420 Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,556
    Likes Received:
    3
    may not have been lucy, but you were def trippin!
     
  15. SoulVibrations

    SoulVibrations celestial viator

    Messages:
    910
    Likes Received:
    2
    dude, you wonder why no ones understands you? your grammar is horrible.
    i am bored so...
    What? Drugs change obviously as technology changes, especially marijuana. Grow methods today are superior to those of the 60's and 70's
    your contradicting yourself, or are you disagreeing THC content is higher today then i used to be? Its hard to comprehend.


    Yes, this is mostly true. So just as there are varying methods of "laying" acid there are varying amounts of LSD on a given blotter, even from the same sheet. You cannot say individual blotters have 50-90ug, you just can't. It could be and in some cases is more than that. It depends on the manufacturer.
    [/quote]
     
  16. Runeika

    Runeika Guest

    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't know the blotter size. 2C-B-FLY only lasts like 6-8 hours though. DOB was the only one I researched that lasted 24+ hours sometimes and the effects almost match the effects I experienced exactly.

    Thanks for all the help guys! Time to nicely tell my dealer to fuck off and to never EVER talk to us again. You can't be doing shit like that to people... what if I had a heart problem? That stuff had my heart beating like 120bpm for 15 hours straight
     
  17. inthydreams911

    inthydreams911 Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,223
    Likes Received:
    5
  18. upperlevel

    upperlevel Member

    Messages:
    721
    Likes Received:
    2
    I did mean they had 300ug per hit. Even when it is dropped onto blotter, it is still diluted to 100ug per drop or around there. Thats why they can drop it on your tongue directly and you get a single dose. If this drop had 300ug in it, which it could if that's they way they wanted it, and they dropped it on blotter, it would absorb all 300ug. If it only had 50ug, thats all it would absorb from that drop. That isn't the limit of what a hit of blotter can absorb, that's just the amount the people WANTED it to absorb. Same thing with sugar cubes, they put 100ug on a sugar cube, but a sugar cube can absorb MUCH more than that if they wanted. They dilute LSD before putting it on the medium it will be consumed in.
     
  19. Neil101

    Neil101 Banned

    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    [/QUOTE]
    your one of the people that still responds like a moron, listen i didn't say it was right on the nose from 50-90 ug, it's usual roughly around this area, and i do not care if my grammar is terrible it's the internet, stop bitching about people spelling and do something else. ya i might have bad spelling but doesn't mean that i am a moron, or i don't know what i am talking about, and YES the thc content, for cannabis hasn't changed, it might from strain to strain, and of coarse growing techniques are better. but THC content is still pretty close to how it was 50 years ago, there might be a 2-3% change, but who the fuck is going to notice that?
     
  20. Neil101

    Neil101 Banned

    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    300 ug per hit? that is still unlikely, i mean if your a chemist or a close friend to 1 u might get it like that, but who in there right mind would waste money that way? see my point. that's just not common. i have sold drugs, i know how to make money from them and putting 300 ug of lsd on each blotter isn't the way LOL.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice