SO you admit you were wrong? You CAN FIT A LOT MORE ON BLOTTER THAN 90ug! FRIG! I'm saying LSA can fit on blotter, your were wrong and you just won't admit it, that makes you the moron/troll. Watch some fricken documentaries. THC in canabis HAS CHANGED SUBSTANTIALLY through selective breeding and new technology. http://narconon.ca/blog/info-about-drugs/thc-potency-increasing-years.html
YES I NEVER SAID THE LIMIT, is 90 UG FOR FUCK SAKES, the highest that has ever been tested by my knowledge it had 165 ug on 1 blotter. again as i say AROUND because it's most commonly around 50-90 ug on the streets. it has changed in cannabis? wait this has been proven it hasn't and why watch documentaries about LSD, when i can read about it?
i just read that, because i am going to belive moron's about drugs, and how CANNABIS is laced with LSD, or PCP, or speed LOL! yes because dealers are going to waste there money that way LOL. and lsd on weed? wtf lsd can't be smoked. btw the report also said speed or even meth? well meth is speed, speed is a nick name for it LOL. fuck UR RETARDED, get some real information from people that do real tests instead of Americans. and 10 % wow are they off, u cearly don't grow cannabis, and from my experience it has changed a little not that big of a change, 2-3 %.
Well you obviously aren't doing either, because if you were reading about LSD you would read that back in the day 300ug was a very common dose on blotter. And if you aren't claiming that's the limit why the hell are you even mentioning how much LSD is on blotter if we were talking about LSA. Why can't you just admit that you were wrong and you wouldn't need a sheet of blotter to get a dose of LSA, because I proved that earlier. I don't care about what they say about LSD and meth laced weed, I have definitely know people who have bought that on purpose, but the part that says that "It has given different information showing Marijuana potency has changed drastically since the 1970’s..." You also said earlier that nobody could notice the 2-3% change, but somehow you notcied it and know it is exactly that. You must be some kind of supehero if you can detect a change of 2-3% especially since the last time you tried 70's weed was in the 70's.
WOW DUDE, again get test results to back you up, lucky my info is from test results of thousands of lsd blotters. fuck i know my shit just face it your FUCKING STUPID.
Marijuana hasnt changed in a Million years. The only thing that Changed were the People that used it........ Just smoked some acid Welcome to Hip Forum.. :love:
you have wrong infromation i have the right information, do not argue with somebody with more knowledge, and i said maybe a small sheet as when i first said it i was going by my first calculation, and i can admit i was wrong about the lsa, in the first place, but seriously do not argue about this shit, or send me a link with complete BULL SHIT on it.
your funny as i recall, lsd is sensitive to heat, as with lsa, and even hot tea can degrade lsa, so how the fuck did he smoke lsd? LOL.
YOU ARE RETARDED. Your 'tests on thousands of blotter' have to do with DILUTED lsd and not LSA, they have nothing to do with LSA. I do have tests backing me up and mathematics. Erowid, based on tests, says all you need to feel LSA is 2mg. Many people have gotten dosed of DOB from blotter. Absolute minimum dose that can fit on blotter then is 0.2, the threshold dose of DOB ACCORDING TO TESTS. That means that at least 0.2mg of something can fit on blotter. That means that if we assume the max you can fit on blotter is 0.2 mg, you would need 10 blotters to feel LSA. But this is all minimum dose, so more likely you only need 3-5 to feel LSA. And he didn't smoke LSD, you have no idea what you are talking about.
dude, as i said i can admit i was wrong u don't need to keep on the topic, i called u retarded because you sent me put a link that was written by a retard. speed, meth,pcp,lsd being laced with cannabis? lol. btw speed = meth, lsd = can't be smoked, pcp = costing to much. now if your going to lace cannabis you do it once and that's it. because they keep coming back trying to look for that same effect. they did a similar test with rats and meth.
I am not arguing about canabis or anything, I was just arguing that floes wasn't a liar, and I was right so I am done.
again i never called him a liar, lying is different from being a liar, look the words up, for fuck sakes a liar is somebody that lies often, while lying is something everyone does now and then. lsa blotter is uncommon, and would be a waste, i say it's easier to order a few seeds online and grow them. i do not think he got lsa blotter. but what ever i am not going to comment on this you have your own thoughts and i have mine. we should leave it there. in other words agree to disagree on this subject.