Its one or the other right? Either they realize god exists and they are just lying, or they are too stupid to understand that god exists.
are christians really stupid enough to believe in a giant invisible wizard or are they just bullshitting for attention?
They're just not ignorant and gullible enough. Or maybe they don't need a crutch to make it through life. Or perhaps they don't fear death. Or maybe they just like being liberated from the yoke of religious intolerance. Is it feasible the loathe evilness? What do you think?
But they also have what was called the Chopin complex of heretical society. They more often understand themselves for what they are telling or communicating. What they do is revealed as something else and comes with the baggage of what is said or written. Conclusively it is never begotten who they are as whole people for what they tell is never also what for doing what they are. They do, and that is also telling of more what is next in line to be done. At an inner stratum they are a disowned self and for consious reasons an imbittered self. To be real isn't simultaneous with all of the telling to doing self-knowledge, but the others notice them for who they are thoroughly as a sum for a finally observed character.
i concur. who they are is not begotten of whom they are becoming, but from whence they came. it really just boils down to the way in which they were but not are. in a sense it has more to do with the way in which they perceive their arbitrary sensory outbursts, in a certain method, as to point towards more indigenous populations, which are in essence the control in any sort of "social experiment" involving globalization. really i'd say rather conclusively that what defines an individual by nature of theism, has little to do with indignancies, on the contrary, more to do with the actual method involved with comprehending such an absurd and tragic conclusion/lie.
The dishonesty to oneself is still independent of the freedom of imagination for a God's existence. And that sort of reaiizable thing for faith is either possible to neglect or simply lie to oneself that it wasn't important.
i'm too stupid to notice that a big invisible guy is watching me fuck, making sure i do it the right way or too embarrassed to be honest about it . . .
I am a liar, and secretly have a campaign to end masturbation in the world for fear god will kill my cat.
Apparently, the OP's personal faith is so weak that he feels threatened by the beliefs of others. Hence the insults. Not an atheist, myself, but I stumbled across this and the OP was just too funny to ignore.
All us atheists are liars: we know God exists, but we just want to keep God all to ourselves. For example, you'd be surprised how easy it was to create the universe from nothing. A wonder no one thought of it before. Oh, and weed... that was all God's idea too. The devil tried to veto it, but God said, "Chill, my man. You just have to trust me on this shit."
I'd be LYING if I said it WAS'T STUPID for someone to accept someone's claim of knowledge without real proof.
not many people know this, but god is actually a lot like tommy chong. i am astounded by the accuracy of your impression, good sir
That's sad: claiming knowledge instead of tradition. But the proof issue: can you prove that you (didn't) have sex last night, ..... to the government? It is CALLED "the message is the continuum of the medium." I know that it may have meant exactly hypocrisy for the values of the community I'm joined with. It makes the bitter comment that way. They don't know me though.eace: