^ Bad source. But yes, the story around when the Iraq invasion began was that he had a serious incurable illness (of the kidneys, I believe). I think it's highly unlikely that he was still alive. Something that we might want to consider as well is what we actually mean when we say "Osama bin Laden." Who are we really talking about? As a matter of record, it seems clear that there was a terrorist leader with that name. But he's become a character. No one's sure that he was behind the 9/11 attacks, though that's what everyone knows him for. We know many things about him, but we don't know which stories are true and which are false. We've seen pictures of him, but one would be hard-pressed to say they're all of the same person. Bin Laden is a character, like Orwell's Goldstein. Most of what is said about him is plausible, true of some people, though not necessarily the person who had the name Osama bin Laden. We're not talking about a person here, but an aggregate of ideas. When we are told he is dead, it is the idea that has died. As for the rest, it's completely ephemeral: no body, no photographs, no story. The man named Osama bin Laden may have been physically dead since 2001. That's not what this is about.
Hoaxes as hoaxes are concerned about, they should be believed about religiously. They are taken into account and part of one's right action, or speech, and trust of fellow citizens. If he is alive, you will become the Jewish Crusader and laughing stock to Him.
Well I'm not sure about the punch in the mouth. But it's a pretty correct comment. As it stands today, call a person "french" or "conspiracy theorist" and they are cosidered not worth listening to. There is obviously some sort of game being played. The Gardian : http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/nov/01/afghanistan.terrorism The New York Times : http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/11/o...0&en=373a282aeff2716a&ei=5070&todaysheadlines The Telegraphe : http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...casts-doubt-on-bin-Ladens-latest-message.html
Things that really matter in my life today: 1, My son and his girlfriend look really cute dressed up for Prom. 2, I got some garden planted yesterday. 3, The sun is out and the dogs are having a ball playing. Things of no consequence what so ever: therories about evil people and the opinions of anyone about those evil persons
piss on his corpse, huh .... stupid, inflamatory, senseless It doesn't matter either way ... If he's dead someone else will take his place. In the meantime he'll be made a martyr and terrorism might soar to new heights. If he's not someone else will take his place - in the public eye. In the meantime not only will he be a martyr but he'll also get some rest. And terrorism might soar to new heights.
Have we? Most people don't encourage this and tend to avoid it really..I'm not sure about anyone else, but I try and avoid dark and gruesome images as I think there really bad for the soul! These cannot be good for the human psyche. If you are that way inclined, whats the point? Photos can be so easily digitally altered now, who knows whats real anymore. I think he's dead, but he was dead a long time ago.
the cops killed my brother while I was in Afghanistan ,. guess what... I never seen the body either.. I suppose I never will. Unless I drive to the cemetery and force them to dig it up..Cause I certainly cant afford to do so...
Unlikely. I realize a lot of people, including myself, would like more information and documentation on this whole operation. But you need to understand that in order for his death to do good instead of incite half the world, he can't have been paraded around, he can't have a whole bunch of leaked photos, etc. While it would compromise his alibi of being dead, I'm pretty sure bin laden would issue a statement about being alive, he's been hunted this long, his whole life revolves around playing games with the US, and this would be the BIGGEST way to discredit the US and obama administration. As it is, he was properly and supposedly respectfully disposed of, and while his family will try to use it to get people riled up, if he was paraded around, or buried on land, it would REALLY get people pissed and we'd have a backlash. As it is, maybe I just live under a rock, but I didn't hear anything about riots or anything. Seems to me that more people die when someone burns a koran or draws muhammad. Which would make this quite effective in that he's dead, and none of the people he was championing care.
No he wasn't. People in that part of the world were later pissed off because the supposed dumping at sea is against Islamic tradition, despite the USA saying the exact opposite. And what good is a respectful burial given the fact that he's been the butt of hundreds of jokes since on national tv?
media may want us to believe obl called the shots.. There a new Leader of al Qaeda and /hes been calling the shots long before 911..
Yes and No. I think they some how kept bin laden alive, tortured him got heeps of info, eventually maybe they will kill him. Seems far fetched but It would be hard for us "normal" civilians to comprehend what lengths governments will go to hide the truth because its part of a bigger mission that cant be compromised by passionate citizens. Theirs drugs that'll make him remember shlt he didnt even know, slaughter and cook his own swine.
Yeah. I agree. This is an easy escape route whether he wants to quit bombing shit because he was scared, or he is enjoying time from hiding. I'm waiting for some shit to blow up and then I see his face in tv saying "I'm back, U.S." Anyway, Obama's history with the circumstances of the situation, NO proof whatsoever besides OBAMA'S words, AND the fact his term is almost up so he's fishing for something to increase his chance at a second term, just all of that shit goes together and the only thing I've gathered is Obama saying he's dead...doesn't go together LMAO. I'm NOT a conspiracist, but this shit just doesn't do good enough. Thanks, rockstar Obama.
They're saying that because it would be a lot better for the sake of terrorism to have him planted in the ground where people could go place flowers, hold signs, pray, and become inspired by his myrterdom to blow people up. Of course that side of the world says it's against islamic tradition-and they're right, islamic tradition is to live in the desert and fuck 9 year old girls without knowing how to read or write, while you dictate your "holy" books to your other wife, who's christian and told you all the christian ideas half your religion is based on, before she got too old for you to be interested in. Just like muhammad :2thumbsup: Planting him in his own desert was not an option, it would have caused horrible problems. And planting him in the US was not an option, it would have caused "corpse stealing" outrage, as well as being a nice spot to send people to visit before blowing up our stuff. They did the exact right thing. Yeah, terrorists get pissed when you kill their leaders, and cry foul. Fuck them, it's probably also against islamic tradition to die in a burning falling skyscraper, and they're not too huffed about the muslims who did that, even though there aren't too many falling sky scrapers in muhammads camel caravan camp, either. Also, for those who think he's alive: even the most obama opposed senators have grudgingly admitted that "we" got him, as thought THEY had something to do with it while wasting time talking about kenya or something. The whole senate saw his death.
Jesus was both a jew and arabic. Therfore the christian tradition is to also run around in the desert. But instead with a group of jewish-arab men in some sort of womanless or homosexual-ish type commune. Getting drunk on cheap homemade wine and begging for handouts. While showing contempt for the government, the middle class and local law enforcement. Also throw in consorting with known hookers and telling women to go back or to stay with their husbands, regardless if he was an abusive jackass or not. You want to know what causes events like 9/11 and all acts of terrorism? 1) Ignorance and lack of adequate education 2) Rich bastards that use their power and influence to manipulate an region's people and resources into a state of desperation in order to make money to line their pockets with. But just like fire can not exist without the presence of 3 elements. (heat, oxygen and fuel) Points 1 and 2 don't do a thing on their own. They need the following. 3) Racism. Without racism the essential "hate" needed to make one man detest another so much so; That he is willing to sacrifice his own life and perhaps even the life of his own children in order to hurt or kill those he despises. In a state of hate, moreso than any economic despair, men are willing to do the bidding of scum like Bin Laden, Bush, Hiter, etc. You seem like a nice enough person and we all need to question the way we think from time to time. But remember that you can look at any and all cultures and religions to find something vulgar, distasteful or just plain stupid. You don't have to look far down the christian history lilne to find 9 year old girls being married to old men, priest quoting scripture as an excuse to bugger little boys or executing of aging wives through accusation of witchcraft instead allowing a man to ask for a divorce.
The information backing that was based on a sole statment by Pervez Musharraf, and he later changed his mind. From January 2006... http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2006/jan/03/20060103-093215-2153r/