Sweden: 23 Women Charged with Possessing Child Pornography

Sounds to me like the women were victims as we..

 

^ My thoughts as well. Though they certainly bare some responsibility.

 

i don't see how they could be the victims here, i don't recall reading anything about being forced

i think the children are the obvious victims. i hope the sick bastards rot in jail.

 

ugghh SICK!!!...

they allowed him send child porn so that they could continue the relationship?

what kind of excuse is that!!!.. theyre obviously into it, otherwise they would see him for the sick twisted pervert that he is!.. i dont see the women as victims at all!

poor kids..

this makes me sad.

 

Good points. My issue was mainly with this being stated as an example of women involved in child pornography, when the porn seemed not to be the main issue here by any stretch (except that that's what they were arrested for).

 

that's another way of looking at it. i suppose it's because of the stigma of pedophilia and being a man

it's wrong, but it surprises people that women can be. it has always sickened me, because just as many of the female teachers in my secondary school where blatant pedophiles. one women was let of the hook for sleeping with young teenage boys three times.

may i add, that two male teachers did not had these 'chances'.

but i see what your saying, it makes perfect sense.

 

Good point but not one I completely agree with.

What were those women thinking? That it was acceptable? Decent? They were fine with it? It makes me so sick to my stomach. Those women allowed it to happen and at the very least they condoned it. Some of them took part in the abuse themselves. The sentences are worryingly short.

 

I hate that sexist bull shit.

Were they actually pedophiles though? Though you say the boys were young teenagers, it sounds like they'd hit puberty?

 

It looks like (as evidenced by the number of women) the women were carefully selected to be insecure and manipulable by this creep. They should NOT be getting two year sentences, or at least they should be waived and given treatment.

The man has serious manipulating and child abusing problems. The women just have manipulable abusable failure at life problems.

I mean, some of them might be nasty people. but they were manipulated into this, obviously.

 

yeah, well they were fourteen

that's a pedophile in my book. she was in her forties. maybe it's just me, but i find it wrong - since she, and the men also, were in a position of power and influence.

and anyways, why not me????? :eggnog:

 

well, they may have been manipulated but they still have a responsibility to acknowledge their part in it... reminds me a little of women who stay with abusive men... it's called enabling... they need treatment and so does the guy... very sad...

 

The stench is overwhelming.

 

In these here parts "moral police" is an oxymoron.

 

Two different things. Pederasty IS sex with someone under 18.

It's male homosexual sex with an adolescent (puberty to adult). Pedophilia relates to prepubescent children (under 13. Ish!)

 

It is very wrong. A teacher should know better.

You were one of the lucky ones.

 

Nobody gets born this way, everyone gets manipulated into it, that's true.

But there is such thing to humans as personal responsibility. Unless doctors prove one is actually insane and thus not accountable for his actions.

And in the vast majority of similar cases the study shows that people consciously trade other people's wellbeing for their personal pleasures. It is something that can't be "excused" or you become one of them.