Does industrialism create or alleviate working pains in the Modern Times.

Discussion in 'Science and Technology' started by willedwill, Jun 29, 2011.

  1. willedwill

    willedwill Member

    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    0
    Having the right job will relieve stress. And the best release from the social pressure to get in touch with other people's ideas is the work ethic in such a working rule of command OR progressive structure for labour being employed smartly.


    I guess some people would look to mechanization as the wave of the future and the means to a brighter future. Maybe we will END ALL LABOUR DEMANDS upon the progress of realizing Just work cycles and moral adjustment to improved pay structure. The labour deserves their medical plan and their scientific education for operating the equipment (in post-modernism they have actually believed that "operating equipment for human knowledge" can super-cede the value for economic measures instead of "working out the judgment of productive work for seniority and pay-scales"), and the business is guaranteed the willed control on social incentive to what marxists still call and have called the means of production. But the advantage for sustaining markets and just basically development is the broader sociological condition (human condition) of wealth and social feedback in the quantitative mechanized range.

    Mechanization is much like social self-organization and the human content is for the very-principled ideal getting out of the recession. The modern question has dogged civilization for countless decades; the post-modern is incapable of escaping the difficulty of (a) is working smarter really good for the equilibrium of human health and participation in the environment?, (b) but is the reverse materialistic sociological condition the alleviation of stress and labour tedium and judgment for unsuitable working practices?


    But mechanization has not turned out to be progressive for the tea party. How come? Any answers. But progress and mechanization is better replaced by other forms of sustained development. Is a future better turned to profit motives and exploitation for the shear measure of the humanity of less work and more injustice and inequality to repulse? Any better questions.:biker:
     
  2. wa bluska wica

    wa bluska wica Pedestrian

    Messages:
    4,439
    Likes Received:
    2
    maybe we will END ALL LABOUR upon the progess of realizing improved mechanization and moral adjustment to increased relaxation
     
  3. willedwill

    willedwill Member

    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    0

    Just yet: the inability to amazing environmental projects are reaped for the old ways lost in the shuffle. The electronics industry perhaps can have computers sustained by their own hardware for the fulfilled dream of artificial intelligence; but even this is symptomatic of going into debt without intelligent means for repayment and incentive. WE need to just drop the goldbricking arrangement, and go back to the labour of the naturally created and unalleviated necessity. That is the utopia of pre-marx.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice