Definitions please?

You officious prik
I FORGOT more than you will ever know.. and spent 25 years of my life working for IDIOTS.. so they could waste my effort.

Now i have inherited.. Become like the aristocracy . the royalty.
They Never worked yet you dont question them. why not?

You think every person is suited to live in this crap system called the world consumerist nightmare.. No many are not.. you TOE THE line cause your a puppet
too scared to go your own way.

 

officious: Now there’s a word seldom seen in a forum intended for the free expression of opinion.

Your memory loss is unfortunate -- find solace in realizing that knowledge without application is virtually worthless, anyway.

25 years of wasted effort must also be quite demoralizing. The regret for lacking the intestinal fortitude and shear power of mind to free oneself from such circumstance must be an unwieldy burden. On the brighter side: a lifetime of fallacious reasoning, illogical contempt, and self-pity was obviously accumulated -- now, in your waning years, there’s plenty of time and untold opportunity for spreading the misery.

 

well said

 

The best thing to do is read some books on political ideas then make up your own mind as to their defining features.

 

If working and bettering oneself results in the betterment of others, isn’t that still “betterment of all”. Are you implying that we should we refuse to put forth an effort that benefits others even if we, in the process, receive a benefit from those efforts. Or, that those planning and directing the efforts of others should not benefit from such effort in addition to his own.

If one provides a product or performs a sevice for $1, why is it wrong for those purchasing that product or service to pass it along to others for $2. Even if the original provider is incapable (for whatever reason) of providing the product or service to the end user.

 

Why such great resentment of those who have accumulated wealth by making available products and services which would not exist were it not for their efforts?
Fairness is achieved when a producer/provider and a consumer/purchaser agree to exchange goods or capital with one another. A free market system open to competition provides us with a system which is fair to all with just minimal regulations if any.
A free society is no longer free when government inserts itself between producers and consumers, or applies personal taxes in a way meant to provide equality through wealth redistribution. In a free society such actions are left for charitable organizations who provide assistance when and where needed more rationally and cost effective, funded through the exercise of free will rather than force.
Communes are available throughout the world, including the U.S., where those who would like to live under an environment closer to a Socialist or Communist one can move, although I feel it would be highly unlikely that such environments could come close to matching what exists in a free market society.
The path of least effort seldom, if ever, produces the greatest rewards.

The words Fascism, Socialism, Communism, and Capitalism, have no clear or concise meaning, though I tend to be more supportive of Capitalism.

 

Exactly !!!

:sunny:

 

They are all essentially the same: Monetaryism. The only difference is in the level of (overt) government relationship to business, or at least it used to be. China, for instance, is alledgedly communist but I completely fail to see how their society differs from a major capitalist state like the USA. Every time you follow an -ism you're just another sucker.

Whoever says communism was about making people equal, I think they're confusing it a little with Marxism, maybe.

National Socialist Party = Nazi party.