Am I right to SAY:jurisprudenz is similar in Turkey as in the U.S. but quite different in Iraq (at least at Saddam Hussein's day) or in Saudi Arabia? At the same time the Law is the law anywhere one goes in the middle east and deserves to be present in everyone's dialogue. Nevertheless, in it's transcendent framework of noted realization the law is open to trust and the versions of applied justice for faithful application. Law as common law was not seized for true justice in the movie, the Midnight Express; but due to the strict application of jurisprudenz the immanent trust was availed worthy of correcting the objective circumstance of the debated situations for the survival (economic and medical) of the masses. Does this make sense for the "human nature" in some Syria which is more prone to change than in the neighbor, Turkey? But the transcendent circumstance for the Law may truly be changeless when lived in Nature and the nature of Man and his possessing of wealth. Then in Syria the law may be more meaningful in the transcendent nature of an over-all human nature, and more flexible for what appears as scientifically true (hospitals for sexual problems and the such). Turkey certainly appeared very archaic to the applications of laws for physical man and nature.:2thumbsup: